Interventions to improve bowel cleansing in colonoscopy.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1080/17474124.2025.2450699
Antonio Z Gimeno-García, Davinia Sacramento-Luis, Rashika Ashok-Bhagchandani, David Nicolás-Pérez, Manuel Hernández-Guerra
{"title":"Interventions to improve bowel cleansing in colonoscopy.","authors":"Antonio Z Gimeno-García, Davinia Sacramento-Luis, Rashika Ashok-Bhagchandani, David Nicolás-Pérez, Manuel Hernández-Guerra","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2450699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Suboptimal bowel preparation adversely affects colonoscopy quality, increases healthcare costs, and prolongs waiting time. The primary contributing factors include poor tolerance to the preparation solutions, noncompliance with prescribed instructions, and suboptimal efficacy of the bowel cleansing solution itself.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examined the predictive factors associated with suboptimal bowel preparation and discussed interventions aimed at improving bowel cleansing. It also provides evidence-based practical algorithms supplemented by insights from our own clinical experience. Relevant topics were reviewed using resources from the PubMed database.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Although current bowel preparation protocols are effective for the majority of patients, a significant proportion still present challenges for optimal preparation. These patients may benefit from personalized strategies tailored to the specific causes of preparation failure. Conducting a thorough interview is crucial for identifying the reasons for failure, particularly in patients who have previously experienced suboptimal preparation during colonoscopy. In colonoscopy-naïve patients, it is essential to assess the risk of suboptimal preparation. In both cases, interventions should be customized to either address the identified causes in the former group or employ preventive strategies to reduce the likelihood of failure in the latter.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2025.2450699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Suboptimal bowel preparation adversely affects colonoscopy quality, increases healthcare costs, and prolongs waiting time. The primary contributing factors include poor tolerance to the preparation solutions, noncompliance with prescribed instructions, and suboptimal efficacy of the bowel cleansing solution itself.

Areas covered: This review examined the predictive factors associated with suboptimal bowel preparation and discussed interventions aimed at improving bowel cleansing. It also provides evidence-based practical algorithms supplemented by insights from our own clinical experience. Relevant topics were reviewed using resources from the PubMed database.

Expert opinion: Although current bowel preparation protocols are effective for the majority of patients, a significant proportion still present challenges for optimal preparation. These patients may benefit from personalized strategies tailored to the specific causes of preparation failure. Conducting a thorough interview is crucial for identifying the reasons for failure, particularly in patients who have previously experienced suboptimal preparation during colonoscopy. In colonoscopy-naïve patients, it is essential to assess the risk of suboptimal preparation. In both cases, interventions should be customized to either address the identified causes in the former group or employ preventive strategies to reduce the likelihood of failure in the latter.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善结肠镜检查中肠道清洁的干预措施。
不理想的肠道准备会影响结肠镜检查质量,增加医疗费用,延长等待时间。主要的影响因素包括对制备溶液的耐受性差,不遵守规定的说明,以及肠道清洁溶液本身的次优功效。涵盖领域:本综述研究了与肠道准备不佳相关的预测因素,并讨论了旨在改善肠道清洁的干预措施。它还提供了基于证据的实用算法,并辅以我们自己临床经验的见解。使用PubMed数据库中的资源对相关主题进行了审查。专家意见:尽管目前的肠道准备方案对大多数患者有效,但仍有很大一部分患者面临最佳准备的挑战。这些患者可能受益于针对准备失败的具体原因量身定制的个性化策略。进行彻底的访谈对于确定失败的原因至关重要,特别是对于以前在结肠镜检查中经历过不理想准备的患者。对于colonoscopy-naïve患者,有必要评估次优准备的风险。在这两种情况下,应该定制干预措施,以解决前一组中确定的原因,或采用预防策略来减少后一组失败的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The enormous health and economic burden of gastrointestinal disease worldwide warrants a sharp focus on the etiology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and development of new therapies. By the end of the last century we had seen enormous advances, both in technologies to visualize disease and in curative therapies in areas such as gastric ulcer, with the advent first of the H2-antagonists and then the proton pump inhibitors - clear examples of how advances in medicine can massively benefit the patient. Nevertheless, specialists face ongoing challenges from a wide array of diseases of diverse etiology.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive care of ulcerative colitis: new treatment strategies. Novel nutrition strategies in gastric and esophageal cancer. AKI in ACLF: navigating the complex therapeutic puzzle. Are bowel purgatives useful in small bowel capsule endoscopy? An evidence-based update on the diagnosis and management of irritable bowel syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1