Validation of Sleep Measurements of an Actigraphy Watch: Instrument Validation Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.2196/63529
Mari Waki, Ryohei Nakada, Kayo Waki, Yuki Ban, Ryo Suzuki, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Masaomi Nangaku, Kazuhiko Ohe
{"title":"Validation of Sleep Measurements of an Actigraphy Watch: Instrument Validation Study.","authors":"Mari Waki, Ryohei Nakada, Kayo Waki, Yuki Ban, Ryo Suzuki, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Masaomi Nangaku, Kazuhiko Ohe","doi":"10.2196/63529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The iAide2 (Tokai) physical activity monitoring system includes diverse measurements and wireless features useful to researchers. The iAide2's sleep measurement capabilities have not been compared to validated sleep measurement standards in any published work.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the iAide2's sleep duration and total sleep time (TST) measurement performance and perform calibration if needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed free-living sleep monitoring in 6 convenience-sampled participants without known sleep disorders recruited from within the Waki DTx Laboratory at the Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo. To assess free-living sleep, we validated the iAide2 against a second actigraph that was previously validated against polysomnography, the MotionWatch 8 (MW8; CamNtech Ltd). The participants wore both devices on the nondominant arm, with the MW8 closest to the hand, all day except when bathing. The MW8 and iAide2 assessments both used the MW8 EVENT-marker button to record bedtime and risetime. For the MW8, MotionWare Software (version 1.4.20; CamNtech Ltd) provided TST, and we calculated sleep duration from the sleep onset and sleep offset provided by the software. We used a similar process with the iAide2, using iAide2 software (version 7.0). We analyzed 64 nights and evaluated the agreement between the iAide2 and the MW8 for sleep duration and TST based on intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The absolute ICCs (2-way mixed effects, absolute agreement, single measurement) for sleep duration (0.69, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.91) and TST (0.56, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.82) were moderate. The consistency ICC (2-way mixed effects, consistency, single measurement) was excellent for sleep duration (0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.95) and moderate for TST (0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.86). We determined a simple calibration approach. After calibration, the ICCs improved to 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.98) for sleep duration and 0.82 (95% CI 0.71-0.88) for TST. The results were not sensitive to the specific participants included, with an ICC range of 0.96-0.97 for sleep duration and 0.79-0.87 for TST when applying our calibration equation to data removing one participant at a time and 0.96-0.97 for sleep duration and 0.79-0.86 for TST when recalibrating while removing one participant at a time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The measurement errors of the uncalibrated iAide2 for both sleep duration and TST seem too large for them to be useful as absolute measurements, though they could be useful as relative measurements. The measurement errors after calibration are low, and the calibration approach is general and robust, validating the use of iAide2's sleep measurement functions alongside its other features in physical activity research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e63529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The iAide2 (Tokai) physical activity monitoring system includes diverse measurements and wireless features useful to researchers. The iAide2's sleep measurement capabilities have not been compared to validated sleep measurement standards in any published work.

Objective: We aimed to assess the iAide2's sleep duration and total sleep time (TST) measurement performance and perform calibration if needed.

Methods: We performed free-living sleep monitoring in 6 convenience-sampled participants without known sleep disorders recruited from within the Waki DTx Laboratory at the Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo. To assess free-living sleep, we validated the iAide2 against a second actigraph that was previously validated against polysomnography, the MotionWatch 8 (MW8; CamNtech Ltd). The participants wore both devices on the nondominant arm, with the MW8 closest to the hand, all day except when bathing. The MW8 and iAide2 assessments both used the MW8 EVENT-marker button to record bedtime and risetime. For the MW8, MotionWare Software (version 1.4.20; CamNtech Ltd) provided TST, and we calculated sleep duration from the sleep onset and sleep offset provided by the software. We used a similar process with the iAide2, using iAide2 software (version 7.0). We analyzed 64 nights and evaluated the agreement between the iAide2 and the MW8 for sleep duration and TST based on intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: The absolute ICCs (2-way mixed effects, absolute agreement, single measurement) for sleep duration (0.69, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.91) and TST (0.56, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.82) were moderate. The consistency ICC (2-way mixed effects, consistency, single measurement) was excellent for sleep duration (0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.95) and moderate for TST (0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.86). We determined a simple calibration approach. After calibration, the ICCs improved to 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.98) for sleep duration and 0.82 (95% CI 0.71-0.88) for TST. The results were not sensitive to the specific participants included, with an ICC range of 0.96-0.97 for sleep duration and 0.79-0.87 for TST when applying our calibration equation to data removing one participant at a time and 0.96-0.97 for sleep duration and 0.79-0.86 for TST when recalibrating while removing one participant at a time.

Conclusions: The measurement errors of the uncalibrated iAide2 for both sleep duration and TST seem too large for them to be useful as absolute measurements, though they could be useful as relative measurements. The measurement errors after calibration are low, and the calibration approach is general and robust, validating the use of iAide2's sleep measurement functions alongside its other features in physical activity research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活动记录仪睡眠测量的验证:仪器验证研究。
背景:iAide2 (Tokai)身体活动监测系统包括多种测量和无线功能,对研究人员有用。iAide2的睡眠测量能力尚未在任何已发表的工作中与经过验证的睡眠测量标准进行比较。目的:我们旨在评估iAide2的睡眠持续时间和总睡眠时间(TST)测量性能,并在需要时进行校准。方法:我们从东京大学医学研究生院Waki DTx实验室招募了6名无已知睡眠障碍的方便抽样参与者,对他们进行了自由生活睡眠监测。为了评估自由生活睡眠,我们将iAide2与另一种活动记录仪MotionWatch 8 (MW8;CamNtech有限公司)。除了洗澡的时候,参与者一整天都在非优势手臂上佩戴这两种设备,MW8最靠近手。MW8和iAide2评估都使用MW8事件标记按钮来记录就寝时间和起床时间。对于MW8, MotionWare软件(版本1.4.20;CamNtech Ltd)提供TST,我们根据软件提供的睡眠开始时间和睡眠偏移量计算睡眠时间。我们对iAide2使用了类似的过程,使用iAide2软件(版本7.0)。我们分析了64个夜晚,并基于类内相关系数(ICCs)评估了iAide2和MW8在睡眠时间和TST方面的一致性。结果:睡眠时间(0.69,95% CI -0.07 ~ 0.91)和TST (0.56, 95% CI -0.07 ~ 0.82)的绝对ICCs(双向混合效应,绝对一致,单一测量)均为中等。一致性ICC(双向混合效应,一致性,单一测量)在睡眠时间方面表现优异(0.91,95% CI 0.86-0.95),在TST方面表现中等(0.78,95% CI 0.67-0.86)。我们确定了一种简单的校准方法。校正后,睡眠时间的ICCs提高到0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.98), TST的ICCs提高到0.82 (95% CI 0.71-0.88)。结果对所包括的特定参与者不敏感,当将我们的校准方程应用于每次删除一个参与者的数据时,睡眠时间的ICC范围为0.96-0.97,TST的ICC范围为0.79-0.87,当每次删除一个参与者时重新校准时,睡眠时间的ICC范围为0.96-0.97,TST的ICC范围为0.79-0.86。结论:未经校准的iAide2对睡眠持续时间和TST的测量误差似乎太大,无法作为绝对测量,尽管它们可以作为相对测量。校准后的测量误差低,校准方法通用且鲁棒,验证了iAide2的睡眠测量功能及其在体育活动研究中的其他功能的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Technological Adjuncts to Streamline Patient Recruitment, Informed Consent, and Data Management Processes in Clinical Research: Observational Study. Understanding Health-Related Discussions on Reddit: Development of a Topic Assignment Method and Exploratory Analysis. A Digital Tool (Technology-Assisted Problem Management Plus) for Lay Health Workers to Address Common Mental Health Disorders: Co-production and Usability Study in Pakistan. Engagement With an Internet-Administered, Guided, Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Analysis of Log-Data From the ENGAGE Feasibility Trial. Factors Influencing Telemedicine Adoption Among Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Interview Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1