Apnea After 2-Month Vaccinations in Hospitalized Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 24.7 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS JAMA Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5311
Rachel G Greenberg, Wes Rountree, Mary Allen Staat, Elizabeth P Schlaudecker, Brenda Poindexter, Andrea Trembath, Matthew Laughon, Marek S Poniewierski, Rachel L Spreng, Karen R Broder, A Patricia Wodi, Oidda Museru, E Gloria Anyalechi, Paige L Marquez, Emily A Randolph, Samia Aleem, Ryan Kilpatrick, Emmanuel B Walter
{"title":"Apnea After 2-Month Vaccinations in Hospitalized Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Rachel G Greenberg, Wes Rountree, Mary Allen Staat, Elizabeth P Schlaudecker, Brenda Poindexter, Andrea Trembath, Matthew Laughon, Marek S Poniewierski, Rachel L Spreng, Karen R Broder, A Patricia Wodi, Oidda Museru, E Gloria Anyalechi, Paige L Marquez, Emily A Randolph, Samia Aleem, Ryan Kilpatrick, Emmanuel B Walter","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Preterm infants are recommended to receive most vaccinations at the same postnatal age as term infants. Studies have inconsistently observed an increased risk for postvaccination apnea in preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the proportions of hospitalized preterm infants with apnea and other adverse events in the 48 hours after 2-month vaccinations vs after no vaccinations.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized, open-label clinical trial took place at 3 US neonatal intensive care units between August 2018 and October 2021. Infants between 6 and 12 weeks' postnatal age who were born at less than 33 weeks' gestational age and were eligible to receive 2-month vaccines were included.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Infants were randomized 1:1 to vaccinated (received vaccines within 12 hours of randomization) or unvaccinated (no vaccines received during the study period) groups. Cardiorespiratory data were collected during the 48 hours after vaccination or randomization (unvaccinated group).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was apnea, defined as a respiration pause greater than 20 seconds or a respiration pause greater than 15 seconds with associated bradycardia less than 80 beats per minute. Other outcomes included the number and duration of apnea episodes, serious adverse events, respiratory support escalation, and receipt of positive pressure ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 223 randomized infants (117 female; median [range] gestational age, 27.6 [23.0-32.9] weeks), 107 (48%) were vaccinated, and 116 (52%) were unvaccinated. For 2 infants in the vaccinated group, the primary outcome was unable to be assessed. The proportion of infants with 1 or more apnea event was 25 of 105 (24%) in the vaccinated group vs 12 of 116 (10%) in the unvaccinated group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.27 to 5.73; P = .01). The mean number of apneic episodes did not significantly differ (model point estimate of difference, 0.54; 95% CI, -0.12 to 1.21) between the vaccinated (2.72) and unvaccinated (2.00) groups. The mean duration of apneic episodes did not significantly differ (model point estimate of difference, 4.6; 95% CI, -5.4 to 14.7) between the vaccinated (27.7) and unvaccinated (32.3) groups. No serious adverse events occurred during the 48-hour monitoring period. Other outcomes were not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In hospitalized preterm infants, the odds of apnea within 48 hours were higher after 2-month vaccinations vs after no vaccinations. The similar number and duration of apneic events and lack of serious adverse events suggest that current vaccination recommendations for hospitalized preterm infants are appropriate. Neonatal clinicians should continue providing evidence-based anticipatory guidance about postvaccination apnea risk.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03530124.</p>","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5311","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Preterm infants are recommended to receive most vaccinations at the same postnatal age as term infants. Studies have inconsistently observed an increased risk for postvaccination apnea in preterm infants.

Objective: To compare the proportions of hospitalized preterm infants with apnea and other adverse events in the 48 hours after 2-month vaccinations vs after no vaccinations.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized, open-label clinical trial took place at 3 US neonatal intensive care units between August 2018 and October 2021. Infants between 6 and 12 weeks' postnatal age who were born at less than 33 weeks' gestational age and were eligible to receive 2-month vaccines were included.

Intervention: Infants were randomized 1:1 to vaccinated (received vaccines within 12 hours of randomization) or unvaccinated (no vaccines received during the study period) groups. Cardiorespiratory data were collected during the 48 hours after vaccination or randomization (unvaccinated group).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was apnea, defined as a respiration pause greater than 20 seconds or a respiration pause greater than 15 seconds with associated bradycardia less than 80 beats per minute. Other outcomes included the number and duration of apnea episodes, serious adverse events, respiratory support escalation, and receipt of positive pressure ventilation.

Results: Of 223 randomized infants (117 female; median [range] gestational age, 27.6 [23.0-32.9] weeks), 107 (48%) were vaccinated, and 116 (52%) were unvaccinated. For 2 infants in the vaccinated group, the primary outcome was unable to be assessed. The proportion of infants with 1 or more apnea event was 25 of 105 (24%) in the vaccinated group vs 12 of 116 (10%) in the unvaccinated group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.27 to 5.73; P = .01). The mean number of apneic episodes did not significantly differ (model point estimate of difference, 0.54; 95% CI, -0.12 to 1.21) between the vaccinated (2.72) and unvaccinated (2.00) groups. The mean duration of apneic episodes did not significantly differ (model point estimate of difference, 4.6; 95% CI, -5.4 to 14.7) between the vaccinated (27.7) and unvaccinated (32.3) groups. No serious adverse events occurred during the 48-hour monitoring period. Other outcomes were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions and relevance: In hospitalized preterm infants, the odds of apnea within 48 hours were higher after 2-month vaccinations vs after no vaccinations. The similar number and duration of apneic events and lack of serious adverse events suggest that current vaccination recommendations for hospitalized preterm infants are appropriate. Neonatal clinicians should continue providing evidence-based anticipatory guidance about postvaccination apnea risk.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03530124.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院早产儿接种2个月疫苗后呼吸暂停:一项随机临床试验
重要性:建议早产儿在与足月婴儿相同的出生年龄接受大部分疫苗接种。研究不一致地观察到接种疫苗后早产婴儿呼吸暂停的风险增加。目的:比较2个月接种疫苗后与未接种疫苗后48小时内住院早产儿呼吸暂停及其他不良事件的比例。设计、环境和参与者:这项随机、开放标签的临床试验于2018年8月至2021年10月在3个美国新生儿重症监护病房进行。出生时少于33周的出生后6至12周的婴儿有资格接种2个月的疫苗。干预:婴儿按1:1随机分为接种组(在随机化的12小时内接种疫苗)和未接种组(在研究期间未接种疫苗)。在接种疫苗或随机分组(未接种疫苗组)后48小时内收集心肺数据。主要结局和测量指标:主要结局为呼吸暂停,定义为呼吸暂停大于20秒或呼吸暂停大于15秒并伴有心动过缓小于每分钟80次。其他结果包括呼吸暂停发作次数和持续时间、严重不良事件、呼吸支持升级和接受正压通气。结果:223名随机婴儿(117名女性;胎龄中位数为27.6周(23.0 ~ 32.9周),接种疫苗的107例(48%),未接种疫苗的116例(52%)。对于接种疫苗组的2名婴儿,主要结局无法评估。在接种疫苗组中,发生1次或1次以上呼吸暂停事件的婴儿比例为105 / 25(24%),而未接种疫苗组为116 / 12(10%)(校正优势比为2.70;95% CI, 1.27 ~ 5.73;p = 0.01)。平均呼吸暂停发作次数无显著差异(模型点差估计,0.54;接种疫苗组(2.72)和未接种疫苗组(2.00)之间的95% CI为-0.12至1.21。呼吸暂停发作的平均持续时间无显著差异(模型点差估计,4.6;接种疫苗组(27.7)和未接种疫苗组(32.3)之间的95% CI为-5.4至14.7。48小时监测期间未发生严重不良事件。其他结果组间无显著差异。结论及相关性:在住院早产儿中,接种2个月疫苗后48小时内发生呼吸暂停的几率高于未接种疫苗后。类似的呼吸暂停事件数量和持续时间以及缺乏严重不良事件表明,目前对住院早产儿的疫苗接种建议是适当的。新生儿临床医生应继续提供疫苗接种后呼吸暂停风险的循证预期指导。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03530124。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Receipt of Federal Income Support by Eligible Low-Birth-Weight Infants Mental and Somatic Conditions in Children With the Broad Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Phenotype Maternal Downward Neighborhood Income Mobility and Ensuing Severe Neonatal Morbidity NICHD Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Score in Term Infants With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Supplemental Security Income for Low-Birth-Weight Infants-Addressing Gaps in Coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1