Comparison between the Outcomes of Pentamidine and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Non-HIV Patients: A Nationwide Japanese Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.4738-24
Jumpei Taniguchi, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"Comparison between the Outcomes of Pentamidine and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Non-HIV Patients: A Nationwide Japanese Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jumpei Taniguchi, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.4738-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Data on the first-line treatment options for patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of pentamidine compared to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in non-HIV patients with PCP. Methods We used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Inpatient Database. We included non-HIV PCP patients who initially received TMP-SMX or pentamidine between July 2010 and March 2022. We categorized eligible patients into TMP-SMX and pentamidine groups and performed a propensity score overlap weighting analysis to compare in-hospital mortality between the groups. Results Among 5,870 eligible patients, 5,456 and 414 received TMP-SMX and pentamidine, respectively. Pentamidine treatment was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality than TMP-SMX treatment in the propensity score overlap weighting analysis (23.6% vs. 40.1%; risk difference, 16.5%; 95% confidence interval, 10.8-22.2%; p<0.001). Conclusions Based on these findings, pentamidine may not be as effective as TMP-SMX for treating PCP in non-HIV patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13719,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2295-2300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.4738-24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Data on the first-line treatment options for patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of pentamidine compared to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in non-HIV patients with PCP. Methods We used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Inpatient Database. We included non-HIV PCP patients who initially received TMP-SMX or pentamidine between July 2010 and March 2022. We categorized eligible patients into TMP-SMX and pentamidine groups and performed a propensity score overlap weighting analysis to compare in-hospital mortality between the groups. Results Among 5,870 eligible patients, 5,456 and 414 received TMP-SMX and pentamidine, respectively. Pentamidine treatment was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality than TMP-SMX treatment in the propensity score overlap weighting analysis (23.6% vs. 40.1%; risk difference, 16.5%; 95% confidence interval, 10.8-22.2%; p<0.001). Conclusions Based on these findings, pentamidine may not be as effective as TMP-SMX for treating PCP in non-HIV patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喷他脒与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗非hiv患者肺囊虫性肺炎的疗效比较:一项日本全国回顾性队列研究
没有人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的肺囊虫性肺炎(PCP)患者的一线治疗方案数据有限。因此,我们比较了喷他脒与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)在非hiv PCP患者中的疗效。方法采用日本诊断程序综合住院患者数据库中的数据。我们纳入了在2010年7月至2022年3月期间最初接受TMP-SMX或喷他脒治疗的非hiv PCP患者。我们将符合条件的患者分为TMP-SMX组和喷他脒组,并进行倾向评分重叠加权分析以比较两组之间的住院死亡率。结果在5870例符合条件的患者中,分别有5456例和414例接受了TMP-SMX和喷他脒治疗。倾向评分重叠加权分析显示,喷他脒治疗的住院死亡率高于TMP-SMX治疗(23.6% vs 40.1%;风险差,16.5%;95%置信区间为10.8-22.2%;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Internal Medicine is an open-access online only journal published monthly by the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Articles must be prepared in accordance with "The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (see Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258-265, 1988), must be contributed solely to the Internal Medicine, and become the property of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Statements contained therein are the responsibility of the author(s). The Society reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Society.
期刊最新文献
Recent Advances in Gastrointestinal Cancer Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment: Focusing on Older Adults. Development of Antiviral Drugs for Influenza. Acute Ischemic Stroke: Significance of Multimodal Pre-operative Prediction of Intracranial Atherosclerosis-related Large Vessel Occlusion. Recent Advances in Molecular Targeted Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Development of New Molecularly Targeted Agents in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1