Ragnhild V Nome, Øystein Flatebø, Sigurd Leinæs Bøe, Rolf Anton Klaasen, Elin Aamdal, Marius Normann, Nils Bolstad, David John Warren
{"title":"A simple automated assay format for measuring multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors.","authors":"Ragnhild V Nome, Øystein Flatebø, Sigurd Leinæs Bøe, Rolf Anton Klaasen, Elin Aamdal, Marius Normann, Nils Bolstad, David John Warren","doi":"10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival rates in oncology, but there is a rising concern for immune-related adverse health outcomes. Monitoring drug serum concentration would enable tailored dosing, however this strategy has not yet been evaluated for ICIs. Fully automated analyte capture assays with time-resolved fluorometry using protein A as tracer, were developed for three different ICIs; the cytotoxic T lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA4) inhibitor ipilimumab (Yervoy; Bristol-Myers Squibb) and the Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors nivolumab (Opdivo; Bristol-Myers Squibb) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda; Merck). Drug trough levels were measured in serum samples from ICI-treated patients. Measuring ranges were 1-100 mg/L for all three drugs. Automation allowed for 110 samples to be analyzed in < 4 h. Median drug trough-levels after 5-7 weeks of treatment were 20 (range <1.0-45) mg/L for ipilimumab (n = 113), 60 (range 14-75) mg/L) for nivolumab (n = 21) and 19 (range 7.4-39) mg/L for pembrolizumab (n = 20). Routine drug concentration monitoring for ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab is feasible using fully automated analyte capture assays constructed with commercially available reagents. The large drug serum concentration ranges in samples from real-world patients, should be further investigated to assess the clinical relevance of ICI concentration monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":16685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis","volume":"255 ","pages":"116657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival rates in oncology, but there is a rising concern for immune-related adverse health outcomes. Monitoring drug serum concentration would enable tailored dosing, however this strategy has not yet been evaluated for ICIs. Fully automated analyte capture assays with time-resolved fluorometry using protein A as tracer, were developed for three different ICIs; the cytotoxic T lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA4) inhibitor ipilimumab (Yervoy; Bristol-Myers Squibb) and the Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors nivolumab (Opdivo; Bristol-Myers Squibb) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda; Merck). Drug trough levels were measured in serum samples from ICI-treated patients. Measuring ranges were 1-100 mg/L for all three drugs. Automation allowed for 110 samples to be analyzed in < 4 h. Median drug trough-levels after 5-7 weeks of treatment were 20 (range <1.0-45) mg/L for ipilimumab (n = 113), 60 (range 14-75) mg/L) for nivolumab (n = 21) and 19 (range 7.4-39) mg/L for pembrolizumab (n = 20). Routine drug concentration monitoring for ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab is feasible using fully automated analyte capture assays constructed with commercially available reagents. The large drug serum concentration ranges in samples from real-world patients, should be further investigated to assess the clinical relevance of ICI concentration monitoring.
期刊介绍:
This journal is an international medium directed towards the needs of academic, clinical, government and industrial analysis by publishing original research reports and critical reviews on pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. It covers the interdisciplinary aspects of analysis in the pharmaceutical, biomedical and clinical sciences, including developments in analytical methodology, instrumentation, computation and interpretation. Submissions on novel applications focusing on drug purity and stability studies, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic monitoring, metabolic profiling; drug-related aspects of analytical biochemistry and forensic toxicology; quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry are also welcome.
Studies from areas of well established and poorly selective methods, such as UV-VIS spectrophotometry (including derivative and multi-wavelength measurements), basic electroanalytical (potentiometric, polarographic and voltammetric) methods, fluorimetry, flow-injection analysis, etc. are accepted for publication in exceptional cases only, if a unique and substantial advantage over presently known systems is demonstrated. The same applies to the assay of simple drug formulations by any kind of methods and the determination of drugs in biological samples based merely on spiked samples. Drug purity/stability studies should contain information on the structure elucidation of the impurities/degradants.