Prognostic Impact of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Patients With Resectable NSCLC After Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy: A Brief Report.

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JTO Clinical and Research Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100763
Yichen Dong, Long Xu, Jialiang Wen, Haojie Si, Juemin Yu, Tao Chen, Huikang Xie, Xinjian Li, Minglei Yang, Junqiang Fan, Junqi Wu, Yunlang She, Deping Zhao, Chang Chen
{"title":"Prognostic Impact of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Patients With Resectable NSCLC After Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy: A Brief Report.","authors":"Yichen Dong, Long Xu, Jialiang Wen, Haojie Si, Juemin Yu, Tao Chen, Huikang Xie, Xinjian Li, Minglei Yang, Junqiang Fan, Junqi Wu, Yunlang She, Deping Zhao, Chang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The potential survival benefits of adjuvant immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the optimal number of adjuvant immunotherapy cycles, remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of adjuvant immunotherapy and determine the optimal number of cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 438 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between August 2019 and June 2022 across four hospitals were enrolled in this study, with a median follow-up time of 31.3 months. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and tested by log-rank test. Unstratified Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this multi-center cohort, 29.7% of patients (n = 130) achieved a pathologic complete response. Patients who received adjuvant immunotherapy experienced significant survival benefits compared with those who did not (RFS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.037; OS: hazard ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.57, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Subgroup analyses found that patients with a squamous histologic type, positive PD-L1 expression, and those with a major pathologic response particularly benefited from adjuvant immunotherapy. In addition, we found that six cycles of adjuvant immunotherapy served as a threshold for better prognostic differentiation, suggesting that six or more cycles may be more beneficial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that the addition of adjuvant immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is significantly associated with improved RFS and OS in patients with resectable NSCLC. We also identified that six cycles of adjuvant immunotherapy may be the optimal regimen for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"100763"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The potential survival benefits of adjuvant immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the optimal number of adjuvant immunotherapy cycles, remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of adjuvant immunotherapy and determine the optimal number of cycles.

Methods: A total of 438 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between August 2019 and June 2022 across four hospitals were enrolled in this study, with a median follow-up time of 31.3 months. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and tested by log-rank test. Unstratified Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to the subgroups.

Results: In this multi-center cohort, 29.7% of patients (n = 130) achieved a pathologic complete response. Patients who received adjuvant immunotherapy experienced significant survival benefits compared with those who did not (RFS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.98, p = 0.037; OS: hazard ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.57, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses found that patients with a squamous histologic type, positive PD-L1 expression, and those with a major pathologic response particularly benefited from adjuvant immunotherapy. In addition, we found that six cycles of adjuvant immunotherapy served as a threshold for better prognostic differentiation, suggesting that six or more cycles may be more beneficial.

Conclusions: Our study found that the addition of adjuvant immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is significantly associated with improved RFS and OS in patients with resectable NSCLC. We also identified that six cycles of adjuvant immunotherapy may be the optimal regimen for these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助免疫治疗对可切除非小细胞肺癌患者新辅助化疗免疫治疗后预后的影响:简要报告。
目的:可切除的非小细胞肺癌在新辅助化疗免疫治疗后,辅助免疫治疗的潜在生存益处,以及最佳的辅助免疫治疗周期数仍不确定。本研究旨在评估辅助免疫治疗对预后的影响,并确定最佳周期数。方法:在2019年8月至2022年6月期间,共有438名接受新辅助化疗免疫治疗的患者参与了这项研究,中位随访时间为31.3个月。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS),采用log-rank检验。亚组采用无分层Cox比例风险模型拟合。结果:在这个多中心队列中,29.7%的患者(n = 130)达到了病理完全缓解。与未接受辅助免疫治疗的患者相比,接受辅助免疫治疗的患者获得了显著的生存益处(RFS:风险比[HR] = 0.63, 95%可信区间:0.41-0.98,p = 0.037;OS:风险比= 0.27,95%可信区间:0.13-0.57,p < 0.001)。亚组分析发现,具有鳞状组织类型、PD-L1阳性表达和主要病理反应的患者特别受益于辅助免疫治疗。此外,我们发现6个周期的辅助免疫治疗可以作为更好的预后分化的阈值,这表明6个或更多的周期可能更有益。结论:我们的研究发现,在新辅助化疗免疫治疗的基础上增加辅助免疫治疗与可切除的非小细胞肺癌患者的RFS和OS的改善显著相关。我们还发现,六个周期的辅助免疫治疗可能是这些患者的最佳方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
State of Lung Cancer in Egypt: Moving Towards Improved Guidelines for Prevention, Screening, Treatment, and Clinical Care Programs. Surgery for Patients With cT3/4N2M0, Stage IIIB NSCLC. Is It Time to Redefine Resectability? Changing Treatment and Metastatic Disease Patterns in Patients with EGFR Mutated NSCLC: An Academic Thoracic Medical Investigator's Consortium Registry Analysis. Prognostic Impact of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Patients With Resectable NSCLC After Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy: A Brief Report. Associations Between Patient-Reported Nutritional Status, Toxicity, and Survival in Limited-Stage SCLC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1