Maintenance treatment of catatonia with benzodiazepines: A case series and literature review.

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Samantha Zwiebel, Jose De Leon
{"title":"Maintenance treatment of catatonia with benzodiazepines: A case series and literature review.","authors":"Samantha Zwiebel, Jose De Leon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Benzodiazepines, particularly lorazepam, are good options for acute catatonia treatment. Published catatonia literature on benzodiazepine maintenance treatment and benzodiazepine tolerance is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a chart review covering 30 years of clinical experience in the state of Kentucky, (United States of America), where there was no easy access to electroconvulsive therapy. Nine patients with prolonged catatonia requiring benzodiazepine maintenance treatment were selected for review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three cases were switched from oral lorazepam to oral clonazepam, but relapses happened in 2 of them. Two patients lost their response to lorazepam and clonazepam. One with periodic catatonia needed ECT added to maintenance lorazepam. The other patient had 3 episodes of catatonia secondary to sudden clozapine withdrawal and required a restart of clozapine. Four patients were treated only with lorazepam. Two of them had relapses due to non-adherence or taper and needed indefinite lorazepam maintenance with no known relapses. One case initially responded to 1.5 mg/day of oral lorazepam but the dosage had to be increased to 18 mg/day to keep the response. Chronic tolerance requiring higher doses was present in 4 of the 9 patients and 2 of them were catatonic for many months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some patients may need to continue benzodiazepines indefinitely for maintenance treatment of catatonia following failed attempts at tapering. Sudden benzodiazepine discontinuation or non-adherence can lead to loss of benzodiazepine response or need for higher doses. A cross-taper from lorazepam to clonazepam can be accomplished, but is challenging and may result in relapse. \n(Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2024; 26(4): 243-260)</p>","PeriodicalId":39762,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica","volume":"26 4","pages":"243-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Benzodiazepines, particularly lorazepam, are good options for acute catatonia treatment. Published catatonia literature on benzodiazepine maintenance treatment and benzodiazepine tolerance is limited.

Methods: This is a chart review covering 30 years of clinical experience in the state of Kentucky, (United States of America), where there was no easy access to electroconvulsive therapy. Nine patients with prolonged catatonia requiring benzodiazepine maintenance treatment were selected for review.

Results: Three cases were switched from oral lorazepam to oral clonazepam, but relapses happened in 2 of them. Two patients lost their response to lorazepam and clonazepam. One with periodic catatonia needed ECT added to maintenance lorazepam. The other patient had 3 episodes of catatonia secondary to sudden clozapine withdrawal and required a restart of clozapine. Four patients were treated only with lorazepam. Two of them had relapses due to non-adherence or taper and needed indefinite lorazepam maintenance with no known relapses. One case initially responded to 1.5 mg/day of oral lorazepam but the dosage had to be increased to 18 mg/day to keep the response. Chronic tolerance requiring higher doses was present in 4 of the 9 patients and 2 of them were catatonic for many months.

Conclusions: Some patients may need to continue benzodiazepines indefinitely for maintenance treatment of catatonia following failed attempts at tapering. Sudden benzodiazepine discontinuation or non-adherence can lead to loss of benzodiazepine response or need for higher doses. A cross-taper from lorazepam to clonazepam can be accomplished, but is challenging and may result in relapse. (Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2024; 26(4): 243-260)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苯二氮卓类药物维持治疗紧张症:病例系列和文献回顾。
目的:苯二氮卓类药物,尤其是劳拉西泮,是治疗急性紧张症的良好选择。已发表的关于苯二氮卓维持治疗和苯二氮卓耐受性的紧张症文献有限。方法:这是一份涵盖肯塔基州(美利坚合众国)30年临床经验的图表回顾,那里没有容易获得电休克治疗。我们选择了9例需要苯二氮卓类药物维持治疗的长期紧张症患者作为研究对象。结果:3例患者由口服劳拉西泮转为口服氯硝西泮,其中2例复发。两名患者对劳拉西泮和氯硝西泮失去反应。周期性紧张症患者需要电痉挛加劳拉西泮维持。另一名患者有3次紧张症发作,继发于突然戒断氯氮平,需要重新使用氯氮平。4例患者只用劳拉西泮治疗。其中2例因不依从或逐渐减少而复发,需要无限期的劳拉西泮维持,没有已知的复发。1例患者最初口服劳拉西泮1.5 mg/天有反应,但必须将剂量增加到18 mg/天才能保持反应。9例患者中有4例出现需要较高剂量的慢性耐受性,其中2例持续数月的紧张性精神分裂症。结论:一些患者可能需要无限期地继续使用苯二氮卓类药物,以维持在逐渐减少的尝试失败后的紧张症治疗。突然停用苯二氮卓类药物或不依从性可导致苯二氮卓类药物反应丧失或需要更高剂量。从劳拉西泮到氯硝西泮的交叉逐渐减少可以完成,但具有挑战性,可能导致复发。(神经精神药物,洪2024;26 (4): 243 - 260)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica
Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Role of TNF-Alpha through Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity in Stress-Induced Depression. Maintenance treatment of catatonia with benzodiazepines: A case series and literature review. Relative Efficacy of Internet-based and Face-to-face Behavioural Parent Training for Parents of Children with Attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: a Non-randomised Controlled Trial. Transdiagnostic conceptualization of schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. An integrative framework of minimal self disturbance. A 21st-century update of Claude Bernard's Theory about the Constancy of the Internal Environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1