Finite element analysis of stress distribution in cantilever resin-bonded zirconia fixed dental prosthesis and periodontal tissue with alveolar bone loss.
{"title":"Finite element analysis of stress distribution in cantilever resin-bonded zirconia fixed dental prosthesis and periodontal tissue with alveolar bone loss.","authors":"Yayoi Oishi, Kosuke Nozaki, Reina Nemoto, Yin Yue, Mayuko Matsumura, Omnia Saleh, Kenji Fueki","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the stress distribution in loaded zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) and periodontal tissue using finite element analysis, considering reduced alveolar bone levels and the number of retainers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A human skull was micro-CT scanned. Three framework designs were tested: a 2-unit RBFDP using the maxillary left central incisor (#21) as an abutment, another using a canine (#23), and a 3-unit RBFDP using both #21 and #23. The models were categorized based on the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone: M1 (1 mm), M2 (2 mm), M4 (4 mm), M6 (6 mm), and M8 (8 mm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The shear stresses in the adhesive resin cement were lower in the 2-unit designs than in the 3-unit design in the M4-M8 models. The maximum principal stresses in the framework were smaller in the 2-unit design than in the 3-unit design for all models. The maximum principal strains in the periodontal ligament and trabecular bone in #21 were greater in the 2-units than in the 3-units in the M4-M8 models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that cantilever RBFDPs may have a lower risk of framework fracture than 2-retainer RBFDPs, regardless of the reduction in alveolar bone levels. In cases with alveolar bone levels >4 mm below the CEJ, the cantilever RBFDPs had a smaller risk of debonding than the 2-retainer RBFDPs; however, it may increase the damage to periodontal tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the stress distribution in loaded zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) and periodontal tissue using finite element analysis, considering reduced alveolar bone levels and the number of retainers.
Methods: A human skull was micro-CT scanned. Three framework designs were tested: a 2-unit RBFDP using the maxillary left central incisor (#21) as an abutment, another using a canine (#23), and a 3-unit RBFDP using both #21 and #23. The models were categorized based on the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone: M1 (1 mm), M2 (2 mm), M4 (4 mm), M6 (6 mm), and M8 (8 mm).
Results: The shear stresses in the adhesive resin cement were lower in the 2-unit designs than in the 3-unit design in the M4-M8 models. The maximum principal stresses in the framework were smaller in the 2-unit design than in the 3-unit design for all models. The maximum principal strains in the periodontal ligament and trabecular bone in #21 were greater in the 2-units than in the 3-units in the M4-M8 models.
Conclusions: This study suggests that cantilever RBFDPs may have a lower risk of framework fracture than 2-retainer RBFDPs, regardless of the reduction in alveolar bone levels. In cases with alveolar bone levels >4 mm below the CEJ, the cantilever RBFDPs had a smaller risk of debonding than the 2-retainer RBFDPs; however, it may increase the damage to periodontal tissue.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function.
The most-targeted topics:
1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics
2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics
3) Oral Implantology
4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology)
5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism)
6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry
8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation
9) Digital Dentistry
Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions.
Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.