Finite element analysis of stress distribution in cantilever resin-bonded zirconia fixed dental prosthesis and periodontal tissue with alveolar bone loss.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of prosthodontic research Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00148
Yayoi Oishi, Kosuke Nozaki, Reina Nemoto, Yin Yue, Mayuko Matsumura, Omnia Saleh, Kenji Fueki
{"title":"Finite element analysis of stress distribution in cantilever resin-bonded zirconia fixed dental prosthesis and periodontal tissue with alveolar bone loss.","authors":"Yayoi Oishi, Kosuke Nozaki, Reina Nemoto, Yin Yue, Mayuko Matsumura, Omnia Saleh, Kenji Fueki","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the stress distribution in loaded zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) and periodontal tissue using finite element analysis, considering reduced alveolar bone levels and the number of retainers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A human skull was micro-CT scanned. Three framework designs were tested: a 2-unit RBFDP using the maxillary left central incisor (#21) as an abutment, another using a canine (#23), and a 3-unit RBFDP using both #21 and #23. The models were categorized based on the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone: M1 (1 mm), M2 (2 mm), M4 (4 mm), M6 (6 mm), and M8 (8 mm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The shear stresses in the adhesive resin cement were lower in the 2-unit designs than in the 3-unit design in the M4-M8 models. The maximum principal stresses in the framework were smaller in the 2-unit design than in the 3-unit design for all models. The maximum principal strains in the periodontal ligament and trabecular bone in #21 were greater in the 2-units than in the 3-units in the M4-M8 models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that cantilever RBFDPs may have a lower risk of framework fracture than 2-retainer RBFDPs, regardless of the reduction in alveolar bone levels. In cases with alveolar bone levels >4 mm below the CEJ, the cantilever RBFDPs had a smaller risk of debonding than the 2-retainer RBFDPs; however, it may increase the damage to periodontal tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the stress distribution in loaded zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) and periodontal tissue using finite element analysis, considering reduced alveolar bone levels and the number of retainers.

Methods: A human skull was micro-CT scanned. Three framework designs were tested: a 2-unit RBFDP using the maxillary left central incisor (#21) as an abutment, another using a canine (#23), and a 3-unit RBFDP using both #21 and #23. The models were categorized based on the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone: M1 (1 mm), M2 (2 mm), M4 (4 mm), M6 (6 mm), and M8 (8 mm).

Results: The shear stresses in the adhesive resin cement were lower in the 2-unit designs than in the 3-unit design in the M4-M8 models. The maximum principal stresses in the framework were smaller in the 2-unit design than in the 3-unit design for all models. The maximum principal strains in the periodontal ligament and trabecular bone in #21 were greater in the 2-units than in the 3-units in the M4-M8 models.

Conclusions: This study suggests that cantilever RBFDPs may have a lower risk of framework fracture than 2-retainer RBFDPs, regardless of the reduction in alveolar bone levels. In cases with alveolar bone levels >4 mm below the CEJ, the cantilever RBFDPs had a smaller risk of debonding than the 2-retainer RBFDPs; however, it may increase the damage to periodontal tissue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙槽骨缺损时悬臂树脂结合氧化锆修复体与牙周组织应力分布的有限元分析。
目的:采用有限元方法比较负载氧化锆树脂粘接固定义齿(rbfdp)与牙周组织在牙槽骨水平降低和固位器数量下的应力分布。方法:对人颅骨进行显微ct扫描。测试了三种框架设计:使用上颌左中切牙(#21)作为基牙的2单元RBFDP,另一种使用犬齿(#23),以及使用#21和#23的3单元RBFDP。根据牙髓-牙釉质交界处(CEJ)到牙槽骨的距离将模型分为M1 (1mm)、M2 (2mm)、M4 (4mm)、M6 (6mm)和M8 (8mm)。结果:在M4-M8模型中,2单元设计的胶粘剂树脂水泥的剪切应力低于3单元设计。在所有模型中,2单元设计的框架内最大主应力均小于3单元设计。m4 ~ m8模型2-单元21号牙周韧带和小梁骨的最大主应变大于3-单元。结论:本研究表明,无论牙槽骨水平减少多少,悬臂式rbfdp可能比2-固定式rbfdp有更低的框架骨折风险。在牙槽骨水平低于CEJ 4mm的情况下,悬臂式rbfdp比2-固位rbfdp有更小的脱粘风险;然而,它可能会增加对牙周组织的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of prosthodontic research
Journal of prosthodontic research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication. Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function. The most-targeted topics: 1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics 2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics 3) Oral Implantology 4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology) 5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism) 6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) 7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry 8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation 9) Digital Dentistry Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions. Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Statement on a new list of key points to summarize the standard of care for temporomandibular disorders. Thermal stress behavior of monolithic zirconia crowns with different thicknesses. Effect of assistive devices on the precision of digital implant impressions for fully edentulous maxilla: An in vivo study. Three-dimensional-printed restorations for prosthetic rehabilitation of localized tooth wear using the Dahl concept: A case report. Development of an antimicrobial tissue conditioner with quaternary ammonium methacryloxy silane (K18): An in vitro study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1