Keisuke Ashida, Minoru Sanda, Shinpei Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Baba
{"title":"Effect of assistive devices on the precision of digital implant impressions for fully edentulous maxilla: An in vivo study.","authors":"Keisuke Ashida, Minoru Sanda, Shinpei Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Baba","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the effect of assistive device use on the precision of digital impressions for multiple implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of eight participants with fully edentulous maxillae and four implants at position #15, #12, #22, and #25 were included in the study. The assistive device was made using CAD/CAM technology. Digital impressions were obtained using an intraoral scanner with (AD+) and without (AD-) the assistive device that attached to the scan bodies. Each participant underwent five digital and conventional impressions (verification casts (VC)). Dimensional deviations for each impression method were measured using the least-squares best-fit method to assess precision. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post-hoc adjustments for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dimensional deviations were as follows: AD- (37.56 ± 7.43 µm), AD+ (16.23 ± 2.56 µm), and VC (26.48 ± 5.13 µm). One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups (F = 31.04, P < 0.0001), which remained after Tukey adjustment (P < 0.01). The AD+ group exhibited the highest precision, while the AD- group had the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo, digital impressions with assistive devices demonstrated superior precision compared with those obtained without assistive devices or conventional impressions obtained with an implant indexing device.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined the effect of assistive device use on the precision of digital impressions for multiple implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo.
Methods: A total of eight participants with fully edentulous maxillae and four implants at position #15, #12, #22, and #25 were included in the study. The assistive device was made using CAD/CAM technology. Digital impressions were obtained using an intraoral scanner with (AD+) and without (AD-) the assistive device that attached to the scan bodies. Each participant underwent five digital and conventional impressions (verification casts (VC)). Dimensional deviations for each impression method were measured using the least-squares best-fit method to assess precision. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post-hoc adjustments for multiple comparisons.
Results: The dimensional deviations were as follows: AD- (37.56 ± 7.43 µm), AD+ (16.23 ± 2.56 µm), and VC (26.48 ± 5.13 µm). One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups (F = 31.04, P < 0.0001), which remained after Tukey adjustment (P < 0.01). The AD+ group exhibited the highest precision, while the AD- group had the lowest.
Conclusions: For implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo, digital impressions with assistive devices demonstrated superior precision compared with those obtained without assistive devices or conventional impressions obtained with an implant indexing device.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function.
The most-targeted topics:
1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics
2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics
3) Oral Implantology
4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology)
5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism)
6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry
8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation
9) Digital Dentistry
Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions.
Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.