Exploring the relationship between proactive e-alcohol therapy and symptoms of anxiety or/and depression: Post-hoc analyses from a randomized controlled trial

Q1 Psychology Addictive Behaviors Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100576
Kia Kejlskov Egan , Veronica Pisinger , Ulrik Becker , Janne Schurmann Tolstrup
{"title":"Exploring the relationship between proactive e-alcohol therapy and symptoms of anxiety or/and depression: Post-hoc analyses from a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Kia Kejlskov Egan ,&nbsp;Veronica Pisinger ,&nbsp;Ulrik Becker ,&nbsp;Janne Schurmann Tolstrup","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with problematic alcohol use often face anxiety and depressive symptoms, which can hinder treatment engagement, compliance, and effectiveness. Psychosocial therapy through video conference (e-alcohol therapy) may reduce these barriers. We explored whether 1) anxiety or/and depressive symptoms modify the effect of proactive e-alcohol therapy on treatment initiation, compliance, and alcohol intake, 2) proactive e-alcohol therapy impacts anxiety or/and depressive symptoms compared to standard care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants with problematic alcohol use were recruited online and randomly assigned to proactive e-alcohol therapy or standard care. Problematic alcohol use was defined by an 8+ score on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>356 individuals participated; 133 showed moderate-severe symptoms of anxiety and depression at baseline. There were no significant differences between individuals with and without moderate-severe anxiety or/and depressive symptoms in the effect of proactive e-alcohol therapy versus standard care on treatment initiation (3 mo: p = 0.64; 12 mo: p = 0.97), compliance (3 mo: p = 0.40; 12 mo: p = 0.58), or alcohol intake (3 mo: p = 0.86; 12 mo: p = 0.90). No significant differences were found in the proportion of participants with moderate-severe anxiety and depressive symptoms between the two intervention groups after 3 months (OR 0.6; 95 % CI 0.3 to 1.4; p = 0.27).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found no evidence that anxiety or/and depressive symptoms modify the effect of proactive e-alcohol therapy on treatment initiation, compliance, or alcohol intake. Proactive e-alcohol therapy matched standard care in reducing anxiety or/and depressive symptoms over a 3-month follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853224000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Individuals with problematic alcohol use often face anxiety and depressive symptoms, which can hinder treatment engagement, compliance, and effectiveness. Psychosocial therapy through video conference (e-alcohol therapy) may reduce these barriers. We explored whether 1) anxiety or/and depressive symptoms modify the effect of proactive e-alcohol therapy on treatment initiation, compliance, and alcohol intake, 2) proactive e-alcohol therapy impacts anxiety or/and depressive symptoms compared to standard care.

Methods

Participants with problematic alcohol use were recruited online and randomly assigned to proactive e-alcohol therapy or standard care. Problematic alcohol use was defined by an 8+ score on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4.

Results

356 individuals participated; 133 showed moderate-severe symptoms of anxiety and depression at baseline. There were no significant differences between individuals with and without moderate-severe anxiety or/and depressive symptoms in the effect of proactive e-alcohol therapy versus standard care on treatment initiation (3 mo: p = 0.64; 12 mo: p = 0.97), compliance (3 mo: p = 0.40; 12 mo: p = 0.58), or alcohol intake (3 mo: p = 0.86; 12 mo: p = 0.90). No significant differences were found in the proportion of participants with moderate-severe anxiety and depressive symptoms between the two intervention groups after 3 months (OR 0.6; 95 % CI 0.3 to 1.4; p = 0.27).

Conclusions

We found no evidence that anxiety or/and depressive symptoms modify the effect of proactive e-alcohol therapy on treatment initiation, compliance, or alcohol intake. Proactive e-alcohol therapy matched standard care in reducing anxiety or/and depressive symptoms over a 3-month follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索主动电子酒精治疗与焦虑或/和抑郁症状之间的关系:随机对照试验的事后分析
背景:有问题的酒精使用的个体经常面临焦虑和抑郁症状,这可能会阻碍治疗的参与、依从性和有效性。通过视频会议进行的心理社会治疗(电子酒精治疗)可以减少这些障碍。我们探讨了1)焦虑或/和抑郁症状是否会改变主动电子酒精治疗对治疗开始、依从性和酒精摄入量的影响;2)与标准治疗相比,主动电子酒精治疗是否会影响焦虑或/和抑郁症状。方法:在线招募有酒精使用问题的参与者,并随机分配到主动电子酒精治疗或标准护理组。在酒精使用障碍识别测试中,有问题的酒精使用被定义为8+分。使用患者健康问卷-4测量焦虑和抑郁症状。结果:356人参与;133人在基线时表现出中度至重度焦虑和抑郁症状。有和没有中重度焦虑或/和抑郁症状的个体在主动电子酒精治疗与标准治疗开始时的效果方面没有显著差异(3个月:p = 0.64;12个月:p = 0.97),依从性(3个月:p = 0.40;12个月:p = 0.58)或酒精摄入(3个月:p = 0.86;12个月:p = 0.90)。3个月后,两组受试者出现中重度焦虑和抑郁症状的比例无显著差异(OR 0.6;95% CI 0.3 ~ 1.4;p = 0.27)。结论:我们没有发现任何证据表明焦虑或/和抑郁症状会改变主动电子酒精治疗对治疗开始、依从性或酒精摄入的影响。在3个月的随访中,主动电子酒精治疗在减少焦虑或/和抑郁症状方面与标准治疗相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
期刊最新文献
Association between different modalities of opioid use disorder-related care delivery and opioid use disorder-related patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study Intersectionality in substance use disorders: Examining gender, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation in the 2021–2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Mental imagery in the context of online compulsive buying-shopping disorder: The role of pleasure and relief Influence of binge drinking on the resting state functional connectivity of university Students: A follow-up study Impacts of stigma and discrimination on people with obesity who smoke cigarettes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1