Skin shade and relationships: how colourism pits Black and mixed Black-White women against each other.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1495048
Aisha Phoenix, Nadia Craddock
{"title":"Skin shade and relationships: how colourism pits Black and mixed Black-White women against each other.","authors":"Aisha Phoenix, Nadia Craddock","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1495048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colourism, prejudice where people are penalised the darker their skin and the further their features are from those associated with whiteness, occurs within and between racialised groups and can affect relationships. In this paper we examine the complex processes through which colourism positions Black and mixed Black-White women in contrasting positions in beauty and desirability hierarchies based on their skin shade.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 Black (<i>n</i> = 18) or mixed Black-White (<i>n</i> = 9) adults (18 women, 9 men) living in Britain. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis generated four main themes. First, colourist and gendered appearance ideals promoted by mainstream media serve to devalue and thus harm Black people, particularly Black women with dark skin. Second, these ideals can affect Black and mixed Black-White women's experiences of the heterosexual relationship market where women with light skin are desired and those with darker skin often overlooked. Third, colourist appearance ideals and colourist-induced inequities in the heterosexual relationship market affect relationships between Black and mixed Black-White women of different skin shades. Fourth, fostering Black self-acceptance, celebrating natural Black beauty, and creating spaces for dialogue between women of different skin shades are seen as ways to address some aspects of colourism and/or their affects.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings highlight how colourism shapes desirability in gendered ways and how this affects the lives of Black and mixed Black-White women, influencing within-group social dynamics and relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1495048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1495048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Colourism, prejudice where people are penalised the darker their skin and the further their features are from those associated with whiteness, occurs within and between racialised groups and can affect relationships. In this paper we examine the complex processes through which colourism positions Black and mixed Black-White women in contrasting positions in beauty and desirability hierarchies based on their skin shade.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 Black (n = 18) or mixed Black-White (n = 9) adults (18 women, 9 men) living in Britain. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Analysis generated four main themes. First, colourist and gendered appearance ideals promoted by mainstream media serve to devalue and thus harm Black people, particularly Black women with dark skin. Second, these ideals can affect Black and mixed Black-White women's experiences of the heterosexual relationship market where women with light skin are desired and those with darker skin often overlooked. Third, colourist appearance ideals and colourist-induced inequities in the heterosexual relationship market affect relationships between Black and mixed Black-White women of different skin shades. Fourth, fostering Black self-acceptance, celebrating natural Black beauty, and creating spaces for dialogue between women of different skin shades are seen as ways to address some aspects of colourism and/or their affects.

Discussion: Findings highlight how colourism shapes desirability in gendered ways and how this affects the lives of Black and mixed Black-White women, influencing within-group social dynamics and relationships.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肤色和关系:肤色歧视如何使黑人和混血黑人女性相互对立。
肤色歧视是一种偏见,人们的肤色越深,与白人的特征越差,就会受到惩罚。这种偏见发生在种族化的群体内部和群体之间,会影响人际关系。在本文中,我们研究了肤色歧视将黑人和混合黑人-白人女性置于基于肤色的美丽和可取性等级的对比位置的复杂过程。方法:对居住在英国的27名黑人(n = 18)或黑白混血(n = 9)成年人(18名女性,9名男性)进行半结构化访谈。数据分析采用反身性主题分析。结果:分析产生了四个主要主题。首先,主流媒体宣扬的色彩主义和性别化的外貌理念贬低了黑人,从而伤害了黑人,特别是深色皮肤的黑人女性。其次,这些理想会影响黑人和黑白混血女性在异性恋关系市场上的经历,在异性恋关系市场上,浅色皮肤的女性受到青睐,而深色皮肤的女性往往被忽视。第三,异性恋关系市场中色彩主义者的外表理想和色彩主义者引起的不平等影响了不同肤色的黑人和混血白人女性之间的关系。第四,促进黑人自我接纳,颂扬黑人的自然之美,为不同肤色的女性创造对话空间,这些都被视为解决肤色歧视和/或其影响的方法。讨论:研究结果强调了肤色歧视如何以性别方式塑造人们的欲望,以及这如何影响黑人和黑白混血女性的生活,影响群体内的社会动态和关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Dismantling racial inequalities in higher education. Exploring perceived barriers to palliative and end of life care provision in South-West England: bringing together the perspectives of professionals, patients, and families. Unveiling inequality: the sociological dynamics of road infrastructure development and social justice in rural Eastern Cape, South Africa. Using the knife to build the trust? The role of trust in the decision-making process of aesthetic surgeons and women patients/clients. A family caregiver perspective: rethinking recovery with phenomenology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1