Effects of Kettlebell Swing Style and Mass on Female Hip Joint Kinetics.

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.127464
Kasey M Murphy, Bryan L Riemann
{"title":"Effects of Kettlebell Swing Style and Mass on Female Hip Joint Kinetics.","authors":"Kasey M Murphy, Bryan L Riemann","doi":"10.26603/001c.127464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kettlebell (KB) swing exercises, whether performed using shoulder height (SHS) or overhead (OHS) swing variations in therapeutic or strength and conditioning settings, are posterior chain dominant exercises that require hip extension contributions when performed correctly.</p><p><strong>Purpose/ hypothesis: </strong>The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of swing style (SHS, OHS) and KB mass on hip extension kinematics and kinetics in young adult females. A secondary purpose was to determine the effects of swing style and KB mass on the forces applied to the total body center of mass and KB. It was hypothesized that velocity, power, and work would be greater for the OHS compared to the SHS, as well as for the heavier compared to the lighter KB's.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Crossover study design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen physically active females performed 15 swings under four conditions, SHS/12kg, SHS/16kg, OHS/12kg, and OHS/16kg, while three-dimensional dominant limb foot, shank, thigh, pelvis, and KB kinematic and ground reaction force (GRF) data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>KB distance (95%CIDiff: 17.5-25.1 %BH), time (95%CIDiff: 0.067-0.023 s), and peak velocity (95%CIDiff: 0.56-0.74 m‧s-1) were significantly greater during the OHS (p<0.05). During OHS, significantly greater hip joint peak power (95%CIDiff: 1.6-4.1 W‧kg-1), work (95%CIDiff: 0.104-0.527), peak velocity (95%CIDiff: 7.6-40.5 °‧s-1) occurred compared to SHS, although the time and hip angular position of peak velocity and peak power were not statistically different between styles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results may influence choices of KB progressions, suggesting that one may first consider changes in KB mass prior to changing from the SHS style to the OHS style.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 1","pages":"30-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.127464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kettlebell (KB) swing exercises, whether performed using shoulder height (SHS) or overhead (OHS) swing variations in therapeutic or strength and conditioning settings, are posterior chain dominant exercises that require hip extension contributions when performed correctly.

Purpose/ hypothesis: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of swing style (SHS, OHS) and KB mass on hip extension kinematics and kinetics in young adult females. A secondary purpose was to determine the effects of swing style and KB mass on the forces applied to the total body center of mass and KB. It was hypothesized that velocity, power, and work would be greater for the OHS compared to the SHS, as well as for the heavier compared to the lighter KB's.

Study design: Crossover study design.

Methods: Fifteen physically active females performed 15 swings under four conditions, SHS/12kg, SHS/16kg, OHS/12kg, and OHS/16kg, while three-dimensional dominant limb foot, shank, thigh, pelvis, and KB kinematic and ground reaction force (GRF) data were collected.

Results: KB distance (95%CIDiff: 17.5-25.1 %BH), time (95%CIDiff: 0.067-0.023 s), and peak velocity (95%CIDiff: 0.56-0.74 m‧s-1) were significantly greater during the OHS (p<0.05). During OHS, significantly greater hip joint peak power (95%CIDiff: 1.6-4.1 W‧kg-1), work (95%CIDiff: 0.104-0.527), peak velocity (95%CIDiff: 7.6-40.5 °‧s-1) occurred compared to SHS, although the time and hip angular position of peak velocity and peak power were not statistically different between styles.

Conclusions: These results may influence choices of KB progressions, suggesting that one may first consider changes in KB mass prior to changing from the SHS style to the OHS style.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
壶铃摆动方式和质量对女性髋关节动力学的影响。
背景:壶铃(KB)摆动练习,无论是在治疗或力量和调节设置中使用肩高(SHS)或头顶(OHS)摆动变化,都是后链主导的锻炼,正确执行时需要髋关节伸展。目的/假设:本研究的主要目的是评估摇摆方式(SHS, OHS)和KB质量对年轻成年女性髋关节伸展运动学和动力学的影响。第二个目的是确定挥拍方式和KB质量对施加在整个身体质量中心和KB上的力的影响。据推测,与SHS相比,OHS的速度、功率和功更大,而较重的KB比较轻的KB更大。研究设计:交叉研究设计。方法:15名体力活动女性在SHS/12kg、SHS/16kg、OHS/12kg和OHS/16kg 4种条件下进行15次摇摆,同时采集优势肢体足部、小腿、大腿、骨盆和KB的三维运动学和地面反力(GRF)数据。结果:KB距离(95%CIDiff: 17.5 ~ 25.1% BH)、时间(95%CIDiff: 0.067 ~ 0.023 s)和峰值速度(95%CIDiff: 0.56 ~ 0.74 m·s·1)在OHS过程中显著增大(p)。结论:这些结果可能影响KB进展的选择,提示从SHS风格到OHS风格的转变可能首先考虑KB质量的变化。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy with Haglund's Deformity: A Progressive Approach to Post-Operative Rehabilitation in Athletes. Reliability of a Novel Qualitative Assessment Tool for Evaluating a Run Plant Task. Multiligamentous Knee Reconstruction Complicated by Septic Arthritis Following Cosmetic Surgery, A Case Report. The Effects of the Abdominal Drawing-In Maneuver on Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Torque During Trunk Rotation. Why Your Patient May Need a Bankart Repair Plus Remplissage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1