Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Zdravstveno Varstvo Pub Date : 2025-01-02 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.2478/sjph-2025-0007
Erika Zelko, Thomas Peinbauer, Lisa Voggenberger, Fabian Bekelaer, Julia Pantoglou, Denise Stübl, Erwin Rebhandl
{"title":"Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices.","authors":"Erika Zelko, Thomas Peinbauer, Lisa Voggenberger, Fabian Bekelaer, Julia Pantoglou, Denise Stübl, Erwin Rebhandl","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2025-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the differences in patient care across various organisational forms of general practitioners (GPs) in Upper Austria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected from GPs across Upper Austria, examining patient demographics, prescription patterns, staff employment, services offered and the proximity of practices to hospitals. The variability in recording patient visit reasons was also analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 30 participating GPs (Response Rate 5.1%), 17 worked in single practices, 7 in group practices, and 6 in PHC units. In our sample, single practices tend to prescribe more medications for chronic conditions. Group practices and PHC centres are more prevalent in areas with larger populations, offer online appointment bookings more frequently and employ more staff. The study also highlights variability in documenting patient visit reasons, emphasising the need for standardised documentation practices. The most common reasons for the patient to contact their GP, based on ICPC-2 categories, were general and non-specific, respiratory and locomotor problems, and the most common chronic diseases seen in the practice are cardiovascular, endocrine diseases and locomotor system problems. The most common therapeutic procedures were counselling and prescription of medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study, the first of its kind, reveals significant insights into the variability and adaptability of general medicine outpatient practices in Upper Austria, highlighting the need for improved diagnosis coding at the primary care level.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":"64 1","pages":"49-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2025-0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates the differences in patient care across various organisational forms of general practitioners (GPs) in Upper Austria.

Methods: Data was collected from GPs across Upper Austria, examining patient demographics, prescription patterns, staff employment, services offered and the proximity of practices to hospitals. The variability in recording patient visit reasons was also analysed.

Results: Of the 30 participating GPs (Response Rate 5.1%), 17 worked in single practices, 7 in group practices, and 6 in PHC units. In our sample, single practices tend to prescribe more medications for chronic conditions. Group practices and PHC centres are more prevalent in areas with larger populations, offer online appointment bookings more frequently and employ more staff. The study also highlights variability in documenting patient visit reasons, emphasising the need for standardised documentation practices. The most common reasons for the patient to contact their GP, based on ICPC-2 categories, were general and non-specific, respiratory and locomotor problems, and the most common chronic diseases seen in the practice are cardiovascular, endocrine diseases and locomotor system problems. The most common therapeutic procedures were counselling and prescription of medication.

Conclusion: Our study, the first of its kind, reveals significant insights into the variability and adaptability of general medicine outpatient practices in Upper Austria, highlighting the need for improved diagnosis coding at the primary care level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索全科医生的工作在上奥地利:试点回顾性观察研究横跨30个做法。
简介:本研究调查了上奥地利州不同组织形式的全科医生(全科医生)在病人护理方面的差异。方法:从上奥地利州的全科医生收集数据,检查患者人口统计、处方模式、工作人员就业、提供的服务以及诊所与医院的接近程度。还分析了记录患者就诊原因的变异性。结果:30名参与调查的全科医生中,单独执业17人,集体执业7人,初级保健单位执业6人(有效率5.1%)。在我们的样本中,单一做法倾向于为慢性病开出更多的药物。团体诊疗和初级保健中心在人口较多的地区更为普遍,提供更频繁的在线预约,并雇用更多的员工。该研究还强调了记录患者就诊原因的可变性,强调了标准化记录实践的必要性。根据ICPC-2分类,患者联系全科医生最常见的原因是一般和非特异性、呼吸和运动问题,而在实践中最常见的慢性疾病是心血管、内分泌疾病和运动系统问题。最常见的治疗方法是咨询和开药。结论:我们的研究首次揭示了对上奥地利州普通医学门诊实践的可变性和适应性的重要见解,强调了在初级保健水平上改进诊断编码的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cancer Risk Factors Awareness in Slovenian Adolescents. Epidemiology and Risk Factor Analysis of Systemic Allergic Reaction to Bee Venom in the Slovenian Population of Beekeepers. Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices. Factors Associated with Low Back Overuse Injuries in Sports Science Students - A Prospective Study. Patients' Experience with Received Healthcare in Internal Medicine and Surgery Wards of Slovenian Hospitals-A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1