Care and justice reasoning in nurses' everyday ethics.

IF 2.7 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1177/09697330241312379
Soile Juujärvi, Birgitta Tetri
{"title":"Care and justice reasoning in nurses' everyday ethics.","authors":"Soile Juujärvi, Birgitta Tetri","doi":"10.1177/09697330241312379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The ethics of care and justice represent two modes of moral reasoning that nurses use in solving real-life ethical dilemmas.<b>Research aim:</b> The present study investigated what types of dilemmas nurses encounter in everyday work and to what extent they use care versus justice reasoning to solve them.<b>Research design:</b> The study used a cross-sectional survey design. Participants reported a real-life ethical dilemma and its resolution through an online survey. Open-ended data were analysed with an adjusted taxonomy of real-life moral dilemmas and moral orientations. Quantified data were analysed with statistical methods (χ<sup>2</sup>-test, analysis of variance).<b>Participants and research context:</b> Participants were 334 registered nurses and 177 practical nurses from four health and social care organisations in Finland.<b>Ethical considerations:</b> The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare.<b>Findings:</b> Nurses reported six types of ethical dilemmas. Nurses used more care reasoning on the needs of others and conflicting demands dilemmas than on applying rules, social pressure and reacting to transgression dilemmas. Applying rules and needs of others dilemmas were the most common types of ethical dilemmas in both occupations. Practical nurses reported more non-ethical dilemmas than registered nurses did.<b>Discussion:</b> Ethical dilemmas of nurses are diverse, and the use of care and justice reasoning is differentiated according to the type of dilemma. Care reasoning dominates nurses' ethical decision-making when responding to the needs of patients. Nurses use justice reasoning when they apply regimens, rules and procedures. In everyday ethics, care and justice reasoning complement each other.<b>Conclusions:</b> Highly regulated healthcare environments prefer rule-oriented justice reasoning that may supersede care reasoning in addressing patients' situations. Focus on technical-professional expertise may further hamper nurses' ethical decision-making. Nursing education and management should encourage nurses to use ethical concepts and values in their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1771-1782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241312379","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ethics of care and justice represent two modes of moral reasoning that nurses use in solving real-life ethical dilemmas.Research aim: The present study investigated what types of dilemmas nurses encounter in everyday work and to what extent they use care versus justice reasoning to solve them.Research design: The study used a cross-sectional survey design. Participants reported a real-life ethical dilemma and its resolution through an online survey. Open-ended data were analysed with an adjusted taxonomy of real-life moral dilemmas and moral orientations. Quantified data were analysed with statistical methods (χ2-test, analysis of variance).Participants and research context: Participants were 334 registered nurses and 177 practical nurses from four health and social care organisations in Finland.Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare.Findings: Nurses reported six types of ethical dilemmas. Nurses used more care reasoning on the needs of others and conflicting demands dilemmas than on applying rules, social pressure and reacting to transgression dilemmas. Applying rules and needs of others dilemmas were the most common types of ethical dilemmas in both occupations. Practical nurses reported more non-ethical dilemmas than registered nurses did.Discussion: Ethical dilemmas of nurses are diverse, and the use of care and justice reasoning is differentiated according to the type of dilemma. Care reasoning dominates nurses' ethical decision-making when responding to the needs of patients. Nurses use justice reasoning when they apply regimens, rules and procedures. In everyday ethics, care and justice reasoning complement each other.Conclusions: Highly regulated healthcare environments prefer rule-oriented justice reasoning that may supersede care reasoning in addressing patients' situations. Focus on technical-professional expertise may further hamper nurses' ethical decision-making. Nursing education and management should encourage nurses to use ethical concepts and values in their work.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士日常伦理中的关怀与正义推理。
背景:护理伦理和正义代表护士在解决现实生活中的伦理困境时使用的两种道德推理模式。研究目的:本研究调查护士在日常工作中遇到的困境类型,以及他们在多大程度上使用护理与正义推理来解决这些困境。研究设计:本研究采用横断面调查设计。参与者通过在线调查报告了现实生活中的道德困境及其解决方案。开放式数据分析与现实生活中的道德困境和道德取向的调整分类。量化资料采用统计学方法(χ2检验、方差分析)进行分析。参与者和研究背景:参与者是来自芬兰四个健康和社会护理组织的334名注册护士和177名实习护士。伦理考虑:该研究得到了芬兰健康与福利研究所研究伦理委员会的批准。结果:护士报告了六种类型的道德困境。护士对他人需求和冲突需求困境的护理推理多于应用规则、社会压力和对越界困境的反应。在这两个职业中,应用他人的规则和需求是最常见的道德困境类型。实习护士比注册护士报告了更多的非道德困境。讨论:护士的伦理困境是多种多样的,根据困境的类型区分护理和正义推理的使用。护理推理在护士应对患者需求的伦理决策中占主导地位。护士在应用制度、规则和程序时使用公正推理。在日常伦理中,关怀和正义推理是相辅相成的。结论:高度管制的医疗环境更倾向于规则导向的正义推理,这可能取代护理推理来解决患者的情况。专注于技术专业知识可能会进一步阻碍护士的道德决策。护理教育和管理应鼓励护士在工作中运用伦理观念和价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
期刊最新文献
Categories and Influencing factors of critical care nurses' compassion fatigue: A latent profiel analysis. The gift of love: A contemporary view of love in end-of-life nursing care. Navigating ethical challenges in donation after circulatory death: Nurses' perspectives. ICU nurses' moral distress in decisions to implement physical restraints. Navigating institutional cracks: Ethical dilemmas and resilience in narrative nursing practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1