Impact of intraprostatic PSMA maximum standardised uptake value following prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJU International Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1111/bju.16608
David C. Chen, Siyu Huang, Nathan Papa, Shankar Siva, Damien M. Bolton, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Louise Emmett, Declan G. Murphy, Michael S. Hofman, Marlon L. Perera
{"title":"Impact of intraprostatic PSMA maximum standardised uptake value following prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"David C. Chen,&nbsp;Siyu Huang,&nbsp;Nathan Papa,&nbsp;Shankar Siva,&nbsp;Damien M. Bolton,&nbsp;Nathan Lawrentschuk,&nbsp;Louise Emmett,&nbsp;Declan G. Murphy,&nbsp;Michael S. Hofman,&nbsp;Marlon L. Perera","doi":"10.1111/bju.16608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between intraprostatic maximum standardised uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) of the dominant prostatic lesion as measured on preoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) with radical prostatectomy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group, pathological tumour (pT) staging, and biochemical recurrence (BCR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET may offer non-invasive assessment of histopathological and oncological outcomes before definitive treatment. SUV<sub>max</sub> of the dominant lesion has been explored as a prognostic biomarker. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed reviews of digital libraries and databases and retrieved studies reporting SUV<sub>max</sub> quantified on PSMA PET computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent radical prostatectomy ISUP Grade Group, pT stage, and BCR. Quality assessment was performed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment tools. Random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression by ISUP Grade Group and pT2 vs pT3/4 stage was performed. This study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023408170).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evidence Synthesis</h3>\n \n <p>After removing duplicates, 23 studies were included for review. Pooled SUV<sub>max</sub> (95% confidence interval [CI]) increased monotonically with advancing ISUP Grade Group, with ISUP 1: 5.8 (95% CI 3.9–7.7), through to ISUP 5: 17.3 (95% CI 13.1–21.5). For pT2 disease, pooled SUV<sub>max</sub>: 9.7 (95% CI 7.8–11.5) increasing to 13.8 (95% CI 10.9–16.7) for pT3/4 disease. Substantial inconsistency was noted (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> &gt;50%) for all subgroups. This was not attenuated by restricting analysis only to studies using [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Narrative synthesis of six papers reporting BCR showed increasing SUV<sub>max</sub> was associated with reduced time to BCR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Preoperative intraprostatic PSMA SUV<sub>max</sub> increases monotonically with higher ISUP Grade Group and pathological tumour stage. Higher SUV<sub>max</sub> is associated with reduced BCR-free survival. However, the use of single SUV<sub>max</sub> thresholds for clinical decision making is not recommended as variability between studies is high.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"135 5","pages":"720-732"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between intraprostatic maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) of the dominant prostatic lesion as measured on preoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) with radical prostatectomy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group, pathological tumour (pT) staging, and biochemical recurrence (BCR).

Methods

Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET may offer non-invasive assessment of histopathological and oncological outcomes before definitive treatment. SUVmax of the dominant lesion has been explored as a prognostic biomarker. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed reviews of digital libraries and databases and retrieved studies reporting SUVmax quantified on PSMA PET computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent radical prostatectomy ISUP Grade Group, pT stage, and BCR. Quality assessment was performed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment tools. Random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression by ISUP Grade Group and pT2 vs pT3/4 stage was performed. This study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023408170).

Evidence Synthesis

After removing duplicates, 23 studies were included for review. Pooled SUVmax (95% confidence interval [CI]) increased monotonically with advancing ISUP Grade Group, with ISUP 1: 5.8 (95% CI 3.9–7.7), through to ISUP 5: 17.3 (95% CI 13.1–21.5). For pT2 disease, pooled SUVmax: 9.7 (95% CI 7.8–11.5) increasing to 13.8 (95% CI 10.9–16.7) for pT3/4 disease. Substantial inconsistency was noted (I2 >50%) for all subgroups. This was not attenuated by restricting analysis only to studies using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Narrative synthesis of six papers reporting BCR showed increasing SUVmax was associated with reduced time to BCR.

Conclusion

Preoperative intraprostatic PSMA SUVmax increases monotonically with higher ISUP Grade Group and pathological tumour stage. Higher SUVmax is associated with reduced BCR-free survival. However, the use of single SUVmax thresholds for clinical decision making is not recommended as variability between studies is high.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺切除术后前列腺内PSMA最大标准化摄取值的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估术前前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量的显性前列腺病变的前列腺内最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)与根治性前列腺切除术之间的关系。国际泌尿外科病理学会(ISUP)分级组、病理肿瘤(pT)分期和生化复发(BCR)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
期刊最新文献
Defining statistical cure in patients with T1 high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma treated with BCG immunotherapy. Reply to Satapathy et al. Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome 3-year symptom trajectories: the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain (MAPP) Symptom Patterns Study. February's reviewers of the month Response to comment by Semwal et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1