AI in medicine: preparing for the future while preserving what matters

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r27
Raj Mehta, Michael E Johansen
{"title":"AI in medicine: preparing for the future while preserving what matters","authors":"Raj Mehta, Michael E Johansen","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2025 is here and medicine has continued to move away from the utopian vision of our admission essays for medical school. We are spending countless hours on electronic health records scrolling through layers of data to find the information we need, receiving vital information through fax machines, and listening to on-hold music as we try to help patients progress through labyrinthine treatment pathways so that they can get the care that they need. The administrative burden of modern medicine has become overwhelming. Healthcare providers face relentless obstacles in their workflows and inefficient technologies that impede patient care and contribute to suboptimal patient outcomes and physician burnout.1 Clearly, the labour of clinical practice is ripe for disruption and transformation. In response, the purveyors of artificial intelligence (AI) have promised solutions to overcome these seemingly intractable obstacles and inefficiencies. Given past experiences with the introduction of technology, such ambitious promises may understandably elicit doubt. A new paper …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"203 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

2025 is here and medicine has continued to move away from the utopian vision of our admission essays for medical school. We are spending countless hours on electronic health records scrolling through layers of data to find the information we need, receiving vital information through fax machines, and listening to on-hold music as we try to help patients progress through labyrinthine treatment pathways so that they can get the care that they need. The administrative burden of modern medicine has become overwhelming. Healthcare providers face relentless obstacles in their workflows and inefficient technologies that impede patient care and contribute to suboptimal patient outcomes and physician burnout.1 Clearly, the labour of clinical practice is ripe for disruption and transformation. In response, the purveyors of artificial intelligence (AI) have promised solutions to overcome these seemingly intractable obstacles and inefficiencies. Given past experiences with the introduction of technology, such ambitious promises may understandably elicit doubt. A new paper …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学中的人工智能:为未来做准备,同时保留重要的东西
2025年已经到来,医学已经不再是我们在医学院入学申请文书中描绘的乌托邦式愿景。我们花了无数的时间在电子健康记录上,在层层数据中滚动寻找我们需要的信息,通过传真机接收重要信息,在我们试图帮助病人通过迷宫般的治疗途径以获得他们需要的护理时,听着等待的音乐。现代医学的管理负担已经变得不堪重负。医疗保健提供者在其工作流程和低效技术中面临着无情的障碍,这些障碍阻碍了患者护理,并导致患者治疗效果欠佳和医生倦怠显然,临床实践的劳动是成熟的颠覆和转型。作为回应,人工智能(AI)的提供者承诺解决方案,以克服这些看似棘手的障碍和低效率。鉴于过去引进技术的经验,这种雄心勃勃的承诺可能会引发质疑,这是可以理解的。一篇新论文……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
US vaccination: Judge blocks RFK Jr's controversial reforms. Experts outline "urgent" need for more pregnant women to be included in clinical trials. Afghanistan: "Scores of patients dead" after devastating airstrike on hospital. Intensification or optimisation: the unmet need of patients with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Maternity taskforce set up to respond rapidly to Amos review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1