Yaguo Gong, Yangbo Dai, Qibiao Wu, Li Guo, Xiaojun Yao, Qingxia Yang
{"title":"Benchmark of Data Integration in Single-Cell Proteomics","authors":"Yaguo Gong, Yangbo Dai, Qibiao Wu, Li Guo, Xiaojun Yao, Qingxia Yang","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single-cell proteomics (SCP) detected based on different technologies always involves batch-specific variations because of differences in sample processing and other potential biases. How to integrate SCP data effectively has become a great challenge. Integration of SCP data not only requires the conservation of true biological variances, but also realizes the removal of unwanted batch effects. In this study, benchmarking analysis of popular data integration methods was conducted to determine the most suitable method for SCP data. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of these integration methods, a novel evaluation system was proposed for integrating SCP data. This evaluation system consists of three objective measures from different perspectives: category (<i><b>a</b></i>), the efficacy of correcting batch effects; category (<i><b>b</b></i>), the power of conserving biological variances; and category (<i><b>c</b></i>), the ability to identify consistent markers. For this comprehensive evaluation, five benchmark data sets under different scenarios (containing substantial proteins, substantial cells, multiple batches, multiple cell types, and unbalanced data) were utilized for selecting the most suitable data integration method. As a result, three methods, ComBat, Scanorama, and Seurat version 3 CCA, were identified as the most recommended methods for integrating SCP data. Overall, this systematic evaluation might provide valuable guidance in choosing the appropriate method for data integration in the SCP.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Single-cell proteomics (SCP) detected based on different technologies always involves batch-specific variations because of differences in sample processing and other potential biases. How to integrate SCP data effectively has become a great challenge. Integration of SCP data not only requires the conservation of true biological variances, but also realizes the removal of unwanted batch effects. In this study, benchmarking analysis of popular data integration methods was conducted to determine the most suitable method for SCP data. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of these integration methods, a novel evaluation system was proposed for integrating SCP data. This evaluation system consists of three objective measures from different perspectives: category (a), the efficacy of correcting batch effects; category (b), the power of conserving biological variances; and category (c), the ability to identify consistent markers. For this comprehensive evaluation, five benchmark data sets under different scenarios (containing substantial proteins, substantial cells, multiple batches, multiple cell types, and unbalanced data) were utilized for selecting the most suitable data integration method. As a result, three methods, ComBat, Scanorama, and Seurat version 3 CCA, were identified as the most recommended methods for integrating SCP data. Overall, this systematic evaluation might provide valuable guidance in choosing the appropriate method for data integration in the SCP.
期刊介绍:
Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.