Crop straw converted to biochar increases soil organic carbon but reduces available carbon

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY European Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2024.127499
Li Li , Jinkang Yang , Yalin Yu , Awais Shakoor , Ahmad Latif Virk , Feng-Min Li , Haishui Yang , Zheng-Rong Kan
{"title":"Crop straw converted to biochar increases soil organic carbon but reduces available carbon","authors":"Li Li ,&nbsp;Jinkang Yang ,&nbsp;Yalin Yu ,&nbsp;Awais Shakoor ,&nbsp;Ahmad Latif Virk ,&nbsp;Feng-Min Li ,&nbsp;Haishui Yang ,&nbsp;Zheng-Rong Kan","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biochar can potentially be used to sequester soil organic carbon (SOC). However, a comprehensive assessment of SOC and its fractions in response to biochar produced by crop straw is still lacking compared to straw return. Here, a global meta-analysis with 58 publications was conducted to quantify the impacts of straw biochar on SOC contents. The results showed that straw biochar (BC) addition increased SOC content by 49.4 % and 20.1 % compared to straw removal (S0) and straw return (ST), respectively. Random Forest model suggested that soil initial total N, mean annual precipitation (MAP), bulk density (BD), mean annual temperature (MAT), initial SOC, and biochar pyrolysis temperature were the critical factors affecting SOC contents under BC than that under S0 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Compared to ST, experimental duration, soil initial total N, initial SOC, cropping system, soil pH, and land use were the main factors driving the response of SOC to BC (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Specifically, with significant variations among subgroups, the biochar-amended soil had higher relative changes in SOC content under experimental duration of 2–4 years (23.0 %), soil initial total N ≤ 0.9 g kg<sup>−1</sup> (28.0 %), initial SOC &lt; 9 g kg<sup>−1</sup> (26.0 %), double cropping system (23.8 %), soil initial pH &gt; 6.4 (22.6 %), paddy-upland (19.8 %) when compared to ST. Straw biochar had a higher microbial biomass carbon (MBC), humic acid carbon (HAC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) compared with S0. Whereas compared to ST, BC significantly decreased the concentrations of MBC, mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), fulvic acid carbon (FAC), and DOC, indicating that biochar produced by crop straw is not conductive to microbial utilization and growth. Overall, straw biochar application enhances SOC accumulation while it is difficult to be used by microorganisms. It is recommended that the co-application of crop straw and biochar from straw may benefit both SOC sequestration and the microbially mediated carbon cycle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 127499"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124004209","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biochar can potentially be used to sequester soil organic carbon (SOC). However, a comprehensive assessment of SOC and its fractions in response to biochar produced by crop straw is still lacking compared to straw return. Here, a global meta-analysis with 58 publications was conducted to quantify the impacts of straw biochar on SOC contents. The results showed that straw biochar (BC) addition increased SOC content by 49.4 % and 20.1 % compared to straw removal (S0) and straw return (ST), respectively. Random Forest model suggested that soil initial total N, mean annual precipitation (MAP), bulk density (BD), mean annual temperature (MAT), initial SOC, and biochar pyrolysis temperature were the critical factors affecting SOC contents under BC than that under S0 (P < 0.05). Compared to ST, experimental duration, soil initial total N, initial SOC, cropping system, soil pH, and land use were the main factors driving the response of SOC to BC (P < 0.05). Specifically, with significant variations among subgroups, the biochar-amended soil had higher relative changes in SOC content under experimental duration of 2–4 years (23.0 %), soil initial total N ≤ 0.9 g kg−1 (28.0 %), initial SOC < 9 g kg−1 (26.0 %), double cropping system (23.8 %), soil initial pH > 6.4 (22.6 %), paddy-upland (19.8 %) when compared to ST. Straw biochar had a higher microbial biomass carbon (MBC), humic acid carbon (HAC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) compared with S0. Whereas compared to ST, BC significantly decreased the concentrations of MBC, mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), fulvic acid carbon (FAC), and DOC, indicating that biochar produced by crop straw is not conductive to microbial utilization and growth. Overall, straw biochar application enhances SOC accumulation while it is difficult to be used by microorganisms. It is recommended that the co-application of crop straw and biochar from straw may benefit both SOC sequestration and the microbially mediated carbon cycle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农作物秸秆转化为生物炭增加了土壤有机碳,但减少了有效碳
生物炭可以潜在地用于隔离土壤有机碳(SOC)。然而,与秸秆还田相比,目前还缺乏对农作物秸秆产生的生物炭对有机碳及其组分响应的综合评价。本文对58篇文献进行了荟萃分析,量化了秸秆生物炭对土壤有机碳含量的影响。结果表明:与秸秆去除(S0)和秸秆还田(ST)相比,添加秸秆生物炭(BC)可使土壤有机碳含量分别提高49.4 %和20.1 %。随机森林模型表明,土壤初始全氮、年平均降水量(MAP)、体积密度(BD)、年平均温度(MAT)、初始有机碳和生物炭热解温度是BC处理下影响土壤有机碳含量的关键因素(P <; 0.05)。与ST相比,试验持续时间、土壤初始全氮、初始有机碳、耕作制度、土壤pH和土地利用是土壤有机碳对BC响应的主要影响因素(P <; 0.05)。子组之间的特别,差异很大,biochar-amended土有更高的相对变化在SOC含量实验2 - 4年的时间(23.0 %),土壤初始总N ≤0.9  g 公斤−1(28.0 %),最初的SOC & lt; 9 g 公斤−1(26.0 %),双种植制度(23.8 %),土壤初始pH值在6.4 (22.6 %),paddy-upland(19.8 %)圣秸秆生物炭相比,有较高的微生物生物量碳(MBC),腐殖酸碳(HAC),和溶解有机碳(DOC)。而与ST相比,BC显著降低了MBC、矿物相关有机碳(MAOC)、富里酸碳(FAC)和DOC的浓度,表明作物秸秆产生的生物炭不利于微生物的利用和生长。总体而言,施用秸秆生物炭有利于土壤有机碳的积累,但不利于微生物的利用。因此,作物秸秆与秸秆生物炭的混用既有利于固碳,又有利于微生物介导的碳循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
期刊最新文献
Crop and fallow contribution to N2O emissions of contrasting crop sequences Winter wheat maturity date prediction using MODIS/ECMWF data: Accuracy evaluation and spatiotemporal variation analysis Species distribution modeling of Malva neglecta Wallr. weed using ten different machine learning algorithms: An approach to site-specific weed management (SSWM) Straw-mulching rather than plastic-mulching strengthens ammonia-oxidizing archaea in driving nitrification in a nitrogen-fertilized calcareous soil Modeling carbon allocation strategies for high-yielding perennial crops
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1