Evaluating Circular Strategies for the Resilience of Agri‐Food Business: Evidence From the Olive Oil Supply Chain

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Strategy and The Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1002/bse.4121
E. Spada, D. Carlucci, L. Cembalo, G. Chinnici, M. D'Amico, G. Falcone, G. Giannoccaro, G. Gulisano, N. Iofrida, S. Stempfle, A. I. De Luca
{"title":"Evaluating Circular Strategies for the Resilience of Agri‐Food Business: Evidence From the Olive Oil Supply Chain","authors":"E. Spada, D. Carlucci, L. Cembalo, G. Chinnici, M. D'Amico, G. Falcone, G. Giannoccaro, G. Gulisano, N. Iofrida, S. Stempfle, A. I. De Luca","doi":"10.1002/bse.4121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the agri‐food sector, the valorization of by‐products according to a circular economy (<jats:sc>CE</jats:sc>) approach can be a viable solution to increase profits and improve business resilience. However, to facilitate its implementation and dissemination, it is necessary to validate the application of <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> approaches in real case studies and as well as to verify their economic sustainability. This paper analyses the adoption of different circular paths of real case studies in the olive oil supply chain and assesses their degree of circularity through the Material Circularity Indicator (MCI) and economic sustainability through life cycle costing (LCC). As evidenced in the scientific literature, these methodologies represent the optimal approach to assess the impact of circularity in agri‐food processes on companies' sustainability strategies. Moreover, the results can be integrated to facilitate progress toward ever‐greater sustainability. Findings show that the degree of circularity varies according to the different strategies adopted, highlighting better economic viability of firms that adopt <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc> strategies, whose profits are less sensitive to changes in input and output prices and therefore more resilient from an economic point of view when market fluctuations occur.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4121","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the agri‐food sector, the valorization of by‐products according to a circular economy (CE) approach can be a viable solution to increase profits and improve business resilience. However, to facilitate its implementation and dissemination, it is necessary to validate the application of CE approaches in real case studies and as well as to verify their economic sustainability. This paper analyses the adoption of different circular paths of real case studies in the olive oil supply chain and assesses their degree of circularity through the Material Circularity Indicator (MCI) and economic sustainability through life cycle costing (LCC). As evidenced in the scientific literature, these methodologies represent the optimal approach to assess the impact of circularity in agri‐food processes on companies' sustainability strategies. Moreover, the results can be integrated to facilitate progress toward ever‐greater sustainability. Findings show that the degree of circularity varies according to the different strategies adopted, highlighting better economic viability of firms that adopt CE strategies, whose profits are less sensitive to changes in input and output prices and therefore more resilient from an economic point of view when market fluctuations occur.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估农业食品企业弹性的循环战略:来自橄榄油供应链的证据
在农业食品部门,根据循环经济(CE)方法对副产品进行定价是增加利润和提高业务弹性的可行解决方案。但是,为了促进其执行和传播,必须在实际案例研究中验证环境行政方法的应用,并验证其经济可持续性。本文分析了橄榄油供应链中采用不同循环路径的实际案例,并通过材料循环指标(MCI)和生命周期成本(LCC)评估了它们的循环程度。正如科学文献所证明的那样,这些方法代表了评估农业食品过程中循环对公司可持续发展战略影响的最佳方法。此外,这些结果可以综合起来,促进朝着更大的可持续性发展。调查结果表明,循环的程度因所采用的战略不同而有所不同,突出表明,采用可持续发展战略的公司的经济生存能力较好,其利润对投入和产出价格的变化不太敏感,因此从经济角度看,在市场波动时更具弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
SDG walking or washing? A cross‐sectoral analysis of business contribution to the SDGs ESG‐Firm Performance Nexus: Evidence From an Emerging Economy Unlocking Synergies: Sufficiency Economy Philosophy for Sustainability Exploring the Impact of Supply Chain Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Performance: An Empirical Investigation Does Societal Trust Reduce Greenwashing? International Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1