Navigating choices: understanding the decision-making journey of patients with localised kidney cancer

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJU International Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1111/bju.16635
Katharina Beyer, Lionne D.F. Venderbos, Monique J. Roobol, Rachel H. Giles, Paul Verhagen, Ravi Barod, Lisa M. Wintner, Michael A.S. Jewett, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Netty Kinsella
{"title":"Navigating choices: understanding the decision-making journey of patients with localised kidney cancer","authors":"Katharina Beyer,&nbsp;Lionne D.F. Venderbos,&nbsp;Monique J. Roobol,&nbsp;Rachel H. Giles,&nbsp;Paul Verhagen,&nbsp;Ravi Barod,&nbsp;Lisa M. Wintner,&nbsp;Michael A.S. Jewett,&nbsp;Mieke Van Hemelrijck,&nbsp;Netty Kinsella","doi":"10.1111/bju.16635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To explore patients’ experience of decision making regarding treatment of localised kidney cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 21 patients with localised kidney cancer, across three countries, participated in either four focus groups or seven semi-structured interviews that lasted on average 2 h. Focus groups and interviews were all conducted in the participants' native language, recorded, transcribed and (if applicable) translated into English. Thematic analysis was used to develop a codebook and identify themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All participants expressed a desire to be actively involved in the treatment decision-making process. However, due to the emotional toll of the cancer journey, which often necessitates quick decisions, actively engaging in the decision-making process was described as challenging. The study revealed 12 key themes. These themes included the impact of diagnostic paths, patient characteristics, patient empowerment, health literacy, source of support, fear of recurrence, trust in treatment and healthcare providers, shared decision making (SDM), professional interaction, personal belief system, and organisational and administrative issues.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings highlight the complexity of decision making, underscoring the desire for patient involvement, SDM, and clear communication. We reveal a significant gap between research recommendations and clinical practice, emphasising the need to translate research findings to clinical application to enhance patient-centred care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"135 6","pages":"953-959"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bju.16635","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore patients’ experience of decision making regarding treatment of localised kidney cancer.

Methods

A total of 21 patients with localised kidney cancer, across three countries, participated in either four focus groups or seven semi-structured interviews that lasted on average 2 h. Focus groups and interviews were all conducted in the participants' native language, recorded, transcribed and (if applicable) translated into English. Thematic analysis was used to develop a codebook and identify themes.

Results

All participants expressed a desire to be actively involved in the treatment decision-making process. However, due to the emotional toll of the cancer journey, which often necessitates quick decisions, actively engaging in the decision-making process was described as challenging. The study revealed 12 key themes. These themes included the impact of diagnostic paths, patient characteristics, patient empowerment, health literacy, source of support, fear of recurrence, trust in treatment and healthcare providers, shared decision making (SDM), professional interaction, personal belief system, and organisational and administrative issues.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the complexity of decision making, underscoring the desire for patient involvement, SDM, and clear communication. We reveal a significant gap between research recommendations and clinical practice, emphasising the need to translate research findings to clinical application to enhance patient-centred care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导航选择:了解局部肾癌患者的决策过程
探讨局部肾癌患者治疗决策的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
期刊最新文献
Defining statistical cure in patients with T1 high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma treated with BCG immunotherapy. Reply to Satapathy et al. Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome 3-year symptom trajectories: the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain (MAPP) Symptom Patterns Study. February's reviewers of the month Response to comment by Semwal et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1