Signal Processing Workflow for Suspect Screening in LC × LC-HRMS: Efficient Extraction of Pure Mass Spectra for Identification of Suspects in Complex Samples Using a Mass Filtering Algorithm

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04288
Paul-Albert Schneide, Oskar Munk Kronik
{"title":"Signal Processing Workflow for Suspect Screening in LC × LC-HRMS: Efficient Extraction of Pure Mass Spectra for Identification of Suspects in Complex Samples Using a Mass Filtering Algorithm","authors":"Paul-Albert Schneide, Oskar Munk Kronik","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The data processing workflows for comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC × LC) hyphenated to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) operated in data-independent acquisition (DIA) are limited compared to their one-dimensional counterparts. A two-step workflow is proposed to extract pure mass spectra from LC × LC-HRMS. First, a mass filtering (MF) algorithm groups ions belonging to the same compound based on their elution profile similarity in the first (<sup>1</sup>D) and second dimension (<sup>2</sup>D). Second, the filtered data are deconvoluted using multivariate curve resolution (MCR) to address potential coelution. The presented workflow is termed MF + MCR and was tested on pulsed elution-LC × LC-HRMS data from a wastewater effluent extract. The proposed workflow was benchmarked to the following three data processing strategies for mass spectra extraction: peak apex (PAM), using the MF approach alone, or using MCR without prior MF. The MF + MCR workflow identified 25 suspect compounds, compared to 23, 16, and 10 identified by MF, MCR, and PAM, respectively. The nine suspects that could not be identified using MCR compared to the MF + MCR all had low total signal contributions, i.e., low intensities compared to the TIC. This showed that adequate preprocessing prior to MCR is essential for trace level analysis. Additionally, it was shown that the MF + MCR workflow extracted statistically significantly purer mass spectra compared to PAM (<i>p</i>-value: 0.003) and MCR (<i>p</i>-value: 0.04) from a spiked blank sample. The results highlight that by utilizing the elution profiles in both chromatographic dimensions, clean mass spectra of analytes at trace levels measured in DIA can be extracted, allowing for more reliable compound identification compared to the workflows that were used for benchmarking.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04288","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The data processing workflows for comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC × LC) hyphenated to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) operated in data-independent acquisition (DIA) are limited compared to their one-dimensional counterparts. A two-step workflow is proposed to extract pure mass spectra from LC × LC-HRMS. First, a mass filtering (MF) algorithm groups ions belonging to the same compound based on their elution profile similarity in the first (1D) and second dimension (2D). Second, the filtered data are deconvoluted using multivariate curve resolution (MCR) to address potential coelution. The presented workflow is termed MF + MCR and was tested on pulsed elution-LC × LC-HRMS data from a wastewater effluent extract. The proposed workflow was benchmarked to the following three data processing strategies for mass spectra extraction: peak apex (PAM), using the MF approach alone, or using MCR without prior MF. The MF + MCR workflow identified 25 suspect compounds, compared to 23, 16, and 10 identified by MF, MCR, and PAM, respectively. The nine suspects that could not be identified using MCR compared to the MF + MCR all had low total signal contributions, i.e., low intensities compared to the TIC. This showed that adequate preprocessing prior to MCR is essential for trace level analysis. Additionally, it was shown that the MF + MCR workflow extracted statistically significantly purer mass spectra compared to PAM (p-value: 0.003) and MCR (p-value: 0.04) from a spiked blank sample. The results highlight that by utilizing the elution profiles in both chromatographic dimensions, clean mass spectra of analytes at trace levels measured in DIA can be extracted, allowing for more reliable compound identification compared to the workflows that were used for benchmarking.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LC × LC- hrms中可疑分子筛选的信号处理工作流程:利用质量滤波算法高效提取复杂样品中可疑分子的纯质谱
综合二维液相色谱(LC × LC)与高分辨率质谱(HRMS)在数据独立采集(DIA)中操作的数据处理工作流程与一维数据处理相比是有限的。提出了从LC × LC- hrms中提取纯质谱的两步流程。首先,质量过滤(MF)算法根据离子在一维(1D)和二维(2D)的洗脱剖面相似性对属于同一化合物的离子进行分组。其次,使用多元曲线分辨率(multivariate curve resolution, MCR)对过滤后的数据进行反卷积,以解决潜在的共解问题。所提出的工作流程被称为MF + MCR,并在废水萃取物的脉冲洗脱- lc × LC-HRMS数据上进行了测试。提出的工作流程以以下三种质谱提取数据处理策略为基准:峰顶(PAM),单独使用MF方法,或使用没有事先MF的MCR。MF + MCR工作流程鉴定出25种可疑化合物,而MF、MCR和PAM分别鉴定出23、16和10种。与MF + MCR相比,使用MCR无法识别的9个可疑点都具有较低的总信号贡献,即与TIC相比强度较低。这表明在MCR之前进行充分的预处理对于痕量水平分析是必不可少的。此外,与PAM (p值:0.003)和MCR (p值:0.04)相比,MF + MCR工作流程从加标空白样品中提取的质谱纯度具有统计学意义上的显著性。结果强调,通过利用两个色谱维度的洗脱剖面,可以提取在DIA中测量的痕量水平的分析物的干净质谱,与用于基准测试的工作流程相比,允许更可靠的化合物鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Correlation between Thermodynamics and Collision Cross Sections in Ion–Modifier Clustering: Experimental and Theoretical Insights into Nitroaromatic Isomer Separation by Corona Discharge Drift Tube Ion Mobility Spectrometry Detection of Gaseous Mercuric Halides Using Acetate and Iodide Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry DNA Logic Gate-Integrated Peptide Nucleic Acid-Optical Fiber Sensor for Ultrasensitive Breast Cancer Exosome Profiling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1