Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET: A Report from the Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup
Gil D. Rabinovici, David S. Knopman, Javier Arbizu, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Kevin J. Donohoe, Oskar Hansson, Peter Herscovitch, Phillip H. Kuo, Jennifer H. Lingler, Satoshi Minoshima, Melissa E. Murray, Julie C. Price, Stephen P. Salloway, Christopher J. Weber, Maria C. Carrillo, Keith A. Johnson
{"title":"Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET: A Report from the Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup","authors":"Gil D. Rabinovici, David S. Knopman, Javier Arbizu, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Kevin J. Donohoe, Oskar Hansson, Peter Herscovitch, Phillip H. Kuo, Jennifer H. Lingler, Satoshi Minoshima, Melissa E. Murray, Julie C. Price, Stephen P. Salloway, Christopher J. Weber, Maria C. Carrillo, Keith A. Johnson","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Alzheimer’s Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a multidisciplinary workgroup to update appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and to develop AUC for tau PET. <b>Methods:</b> The workgroup identified key research questions that guided a systematic literature review on clinical amyloid/tau PET. Building on this review, the workgroup developed 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid or tau PET may be considered. A modified Delphi approach was used to rate each scenario by consensus as \"rarely appropriate,\" \"uncertain,\" or \"appropriate.\" Ratings were performed separately for amyloid and tau PET as stand-alone modalities. <b>Results:</b> For amyloid PET, 7 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 2 as uncertain, and 8 as rarely appropriate. For tau PET, 5 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 6 as uncertain, and 6 as rarely appropriate. <b>Conclusion:</b> AUC for amyloid and tau PET provide expert recommendations for clinical use of these technologies in the evolving landscape of diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Alzheimer’s Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a multidisciplinary workgroup to update appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and to develop AUC for tau PET. Methods: The workgroup identified key research questions that guided a systematic literature review on clinical amyloid/tau PET. Building on this review, the workgroup developed 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid or tau PET may be considered. A modified Delphi approach was used to rate each scenario by consensus as "rarely appropriate," "uncertain," or "appropriate." Ratings were performed separately for amyloid and tau PET as stand-alone modalities. Results: For amyloid PET, 7 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 2 as uncertain, and 8 as rarely appropriate. For tau PET, 5 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 6 as uncertain, and 6 as rarely appropriate. Conclusion: AUC for amyloid and tau PET provide expert recommendations for clinical use of these technologies in the evolving landscape of diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease.