Pietro Arina, Davide Ferrari, Nicholas Tetlow, Amy Dewar, Robert Stephens, Daniel Martin, Ramani Moonesinghe, Vasa Curcin, Mervyn Singer, John Whittle, Evangelos B. Mazomenos
{"title":"Mortality prediction after major surgery in a mixed population through machine learning: a multi‐objective symbolic regression approach","authors":"Pietro Arina, Davide Ferrari, Nicholas Tetlow, Amy Dewar, Robert Stephens, Daniel Martin, Ramani Moonesinghe, Vasa Curcin, Mervyn Singer, John Whittle, Evangelos B. Mazomenos","doi":"10.1111/anae.16538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryIntroductionUnderstanding 1‐year mortality following major surgery offers valuable insights into patient outcomes and the quality of peri‐operative care. Few models exist that predict 1‐year mortality accurately. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for 1‐year mortality in patients undergoing complex non‐cardiac surgery using a novel machine‐learning technique called multi‐objective symbolic regression.MethodsA single‐institution database of patients undergoing major elective surgery with previous cardiopulmonary exercise testing was divided into three datasets: pre‐operative clinical data; cardiorespiratory and physiological data; and combined. A multi‐objective symbolic regression model was developed and compared against existing models. Model performance was evaluated using the F1 score. Shapley additive explanations analysis was used to identify the major contributors to model performance.ResultsFrom 2145 patients in the database, 1190 were included, with 952 in the training dataset and 238 in the test dataset. Median (IQR [range]) age was 71 (61–79 [45–89]) years and 825 (69%) were male. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated robust consistency with an F1 score of 0.712. Shapley additive explanations analysis indicated that ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide, oxygen at peak exercise and BMI influenced model performance most significantly, surpassing surgery type and named comorbidities.DiscussionThis study confirms the feasibility of developing a multi‐objective symbolic regression‐based model for predicting 1‐year postoperative mortality in a mixed non‐cardiac surgical population. The model's strong performance underscores the critical role of physiological data, particularly cardiorespiratory fitness, in surgical risk assessment and emphasises the importance of pre‐operative optimisation to identify and manage high‐risk patients. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated high sensitivity and a good F1 score, highlighting its potential as an effective tool for peri‐operative risk prediction.","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
SummaryIntroductionUnderstanding 1‐year mortality following major surgery offers valuable insights into patient outcomes and the quality of peri‐operative care. Few models exist that predict 1‐year mortality accurately. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for 1‐year mortality in patients undergoing complex non‐cardiac surgery using a novel machine‐learning technique called multi‐objective symbolic regression.MethodsA single‐institution database of patients undergoing major elective surgery with previous cardiopulmonary exercise testing was divided into three datasets: pre‐operative clinical data; cardiorespiratory and physiological data; and combined. A multi‐objective symbolic regression model was developed and compared against existing models. Model performance was evaluated using the F1 score. Shapley additive explanations analysis was used to identify the major contributors to model performance.ResultsFrom 2145 patients in the database, 1190 were included, with 952 in the training dataset and 238 in the test dataset. Median (IQR [range]) age was 71 (61–79 [45–89]) years and 825 (69%) were male. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated robust consistency with an F1 score of 0.712. Shapley additive explanations analysis indicated that ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide, oxygen at peak exercise and BMI influenced model performance most significantly, surpassing surgery type and named comorbidities.DiscussionThis study confirms the feasibility of developing a multi‐objective symbolic regression‐based model for predicting 1‐year postoperative mortality in a mixed non‐cardiac surgical population. The model's strong performance underscores the critical role of physiological data, particularly cardiorespiratory fitness, in surgical risk assessment and emphasises the importance of pre‐operative optimisation to identify and manage high‐risk patients. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated high sensitivity and a good F1 score, highlighting its potential as an effective tool for peri‐operative risk prediction.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.