Behavioral Biases and Cognitive Pitfalls: Navigating Resource Orchestration in Supplier-Partnered Innovation Projects

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2024.3508593
Andrea S. Patrucco;Paola Bellis;Daniel Trabucchi;Tommaso Buganza
{"title":"Behavioral Biases and Cognitive Pitfalls: Navigating Resource Orchestration in Supplier-Partnered Innovation Projects","authors":"Andrea S. Patrucco;Paola Bellis;Daniel Trabucchi;Tommaso Buganza","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3508593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation projects play a crucial role in maintaining competitive advantage but often experience high failure rates. In this article, we examine how behavioral biases influence supplier resource management in failed innovation projects. Using resource orchestration theory as a lens, we analyze six failed projects, each involving two suppliers, to explore how cognitive biases disrupt critical resource management activities, including structuring, bundling, and leveraging. Key biases, such as overconfidence, optimism, and strategic misrepresentation, were found to skew decision making, prioritizing technical competencies over relational history during supplier selection. This misalignment impaired supplier interactions and knowledge-sharing practices, ultimately contributing to project failure. The findings offer a novel perspective on how cognitive biases undermine resource orchestration and highlight the importance of incorporating collaborative history into supplier selection frameworks. Addressing these biases can significantly improve decision-making processes and enhance the success of innovation projects.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"227-239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10770288/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovation projects play a crucial role in maintaining competitive advantage but often experience high failure rates. In this article, we examine how behavioral biases influence supplier resource management in failed innovation projects. Using resource orchestration theory as a lens, we analyze six failed projects, each involving two suppliers, to explore how cognitive biases disrupt critical resource management activities, including structuring, bundling, and leveraging. Key biases, such as overconfidence, optimism, and strategic misrepresentation, were found to skew decision making, prioritizing technical competencies over relational history during supplier selection. This misalignment impaired supplier interactions and knowledge-sharing practices, ultimately contributing to project failure. The findings offer a novel perspective on how cognitive biases undermine resource orchestration and highlight the importance of incorporating collaborative history into supplier selection frameworks. Addressing these biases can significantly improve decision-making processes and enhance the success of innovation projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为偏差和认知陷阱:在供应商合作创新项目中导航资源编排
创新项目在保持竞争优势方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但往往遭遇高失败率。在本文中,我们研究了在失败的创新项目中,行为偏差是如何影响供应商资源管理的。以资源编排理论为视角,我们分析了六个失败的项目,每个项目涉及两个供应商,以探索认知偏差如何破坏关键的资源管理活动,包括结构、捆绑和利用。关键的偏见,如过度自信、乐观和战略错误陈述,被发现扭曲了决策制定,在供应商选择过程中优先考虑技术能力而不是关系历史。这种错位损害了供应商的互动和知识共享实践,最终导致项目失败。研究结果为认知偏差如何破坏资源编排提供了一个新颖的视角,并强调了将合作历史纳入供应商选择框架的重要性。解决这些偏见可以显著改善决策过程,提高创新项目的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
2024 Index IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Vol. 71 Performance Surplus Inconsistency and Firm Innovation: Evidence From China Quality 4.0 Key Dimensions and Implementation Profiles in Organizations of Excellence: A Cluster Analysis IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Publication Information Unpacking the Mechanism of the Economic Impact of University Interdisciplinary Research: A Topic Modeling Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1