Psychometric analysis of the resonance concept inventory†

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chemistry Education Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1039/D4RP00170B
Grace C. Tetschner and Sachin Nedungadi
{"title":"Psychometric analysis of the resonance concept inventory†","authors":"Grace C. Tetschner and Sachin Nedungadi","doi":"10.1039/D4RP00170B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Many undergraduate chemistry students hold alternate conceptions related to resonance—an important and fundamental topic of organic chemistry. To help address these alternate conceptions, an organic chemistry instructor could administer the resonance concept inventory (RCI), which is a multiple-choice assessment that was designed to identify resonance-related alternate conceptions held by organic chemistry students. In this study, two iterations of the RCI were administered to undergraduate organic chemistry students: the RCI-Pilot (<em>N</em> = 484) and the RCI-Final (<em>N</em> = 595). Evidence was collected to support the quality of the RCI items, the validity of the data obtained with the RCI based on internal structure, and the reliability of the data obtained with the RCI. Classical test theory (CTT) was utilized to determine the quality of the items. To gather validity evidence, the Rasch model was used and a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis was conducted. Reliability estimates were made using McDonald's Omega. Since validity and reliability evidence was gathered for the assessment scores, the data obtained in this study supports the use of the 14-item RCI for detecting student alternate conceptions with resonance.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 1","pages":" 231-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d4rp00170b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many undergraduate chemistry students hold alternate conceptions related to resonance—an important and fundamental topic of organic chemistry. To help address these alternate conceptions, an organic chemistry instructor could administer the resonance concept inventory (RCI), which is a multiple-choice assessment that was designed to identify resonance-related alternate conceptions held by organic chemistry students. In this study, two iterations of the RCI were administered to undergraduate organic chemistry students: the RCI-Pilot (N = 484) and the RCI-Final (N = 595). Evidence was collected to support the quality of the RCI items, the validity of the data obtained with the RCI based on internal structure, and the reliability of the data obtained with the RCI. Classical test theory (CTT) was utilized to determine the quality of the items. To gather validity evidence, the Rasch model was used and a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis was conducted. Reliability estimates were made using McDonald's Omega. Since validity and reliability evidence was gathered for the assessment scores, the data obtained in this study supports the use of the 14-item RCI for detecting student alternate conceptions with resonance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共振概念量表的心理测量分析
共振是有机化学的一个重要而基本的主题,许多本科化学学生对共振有不同的概念。为了帮助解决这些替代概念,有机化学教师可以管理共振概念清单(RCI),这是一项多项选择评估,旨在识别有机化学学生持有的与共振相关的替代概念。在本研究中,对有机化学本科学生进行了两次RCI测试:RCI- pilot (N = 484)和RCI- final (N = 595)。收集证据来支持RCI项目的质量、基于内部结构的RCI获得的数据的效度以及RCI获得的数据的信度。采用经典测试理论(CTT)来确定项目的质量。为了收集效度证据,我们使用了Rasch模型,并进行了差异项目功能(DIF)分析。可靠性估计是用麦当劳的Omega来做的。由于对评估分数收集了效度和信度证据,本研究获得的数据支持使用14项RCI来检测学生的共振替代概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
期刊最新文献
Back cover Student conceptualizations and predictions of substitution and elimination reactions: what are they seeing on the page?† Self-regulated learning strategies for success in an online first-year chemistry course ‘Seeing’ chemistry: investigating the contribution of mental imagery strength on students’ thinking in relation to visuospatial problem solving in chemistry† Student's study behaviors as a predictor of performance in general chemistry I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1