Effects of bedding plane dip angle and lithology on the mechanical and micro-failure behavior of stratified rock under uniaxial compression test

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS Archive of Applied Mechanics Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s00419-024-02754-8
Yaoyao Meng, Hao Chen, Hongwen Jing, Qian Yin, Xiaowei Liu, Ke Ding
{"title":"Effects of bedding plane dip angle and lithology on the mechanical and micro-failure behavior of stratified rock under uniaxial compression test","authors":"Yaoyao Meng,&nbsp;Hao Chen,&nbsp;Hongwen Jing,&nbsp;Qian Yin,&nbsp;Xiaowei Liu,&nbsp;Ke Ding","doi":"10.1007/s00419-024-02754-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To investigate the mechanical and micro-failure behavior of stratified rock, a series of uniaxial compression and CT scanning tests of stratified limestone and sandstone at different bedding plane dip angles (<i>α</i>) were conducted. The experimental results showed that with the increasing <i>α</i>, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), peak strain (<i>ε</i><sub>1p</sub>), Poisson’s ratio (<i>μ</i>) of stratified limestone and sandstone all first decreased and then increased, elastic modulus (<i>E</i>) of stratified limestone continuously increased, <i>E</i> of stratified sandstone first decreased and then increased. At different <i>α</i>, UCS and <i>E</i> of stratified limestone were larger than that of stratified sandstone, <i>ε</i><sub>1p</sub> and <i>μ</i> of stratified limestone were smaller than that of stratified sandstone. For stratified limestone, anisotropy coefficient of <i>μ</i> was the largest and anisotropy coefficient of <i>E</i> was the smallest. For stratified sandstone, anisotropy coefficient of <i>ε</i><sub>1p</sub> was the largest and anisotropy coefficient of <i>E</i> was the smallest. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone and sandstone was approaching for UCS. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone was larger than stratified sandstone for <i>ε</i><sub>1p</sub> and <i>μ</i>. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone was smaller than stratified sandstone for <i>E</i>. The failure category of stratified limestone and sandstone at different <i>α</i> was quite different. Due to differences in failure mode, the morphology and distribution characteristics of micro-cracks along the sample height showed a significant difference. With the increasing <i>α</i>, volume fraction (VF) and the maximum area fraction (AF) first decreased and then increased for stratified limestone, and showed no obvious change trend for stratified sandstone. At <i>α</i> = 0º, 30º, 90º, VF and the maximum AF of stratified limestone were significantly larger than that of stratified sandstone. At <i>α</i> = 60º, VF and the maximum AF of stratified sandstone were larger than that of stratified limestone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":477,"journal":{"name":"Archive of Applied Mechanics","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive of Applied Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00419-024-02754-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the mechanical and micro-failure behavior of stratified rock, a series of uniaxial compression and CT scanning tests of stratified limestone and sandstone at different bedding plane dip angles (α) were conducted. The experimental results showed that with the increasing α, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), peak strain (ε1p), Poisson’s ratio (μ) of stratified limestone and sandstone all first decreased and then increased, elastic modulus (E) of stratified limestone continuously increased, E of stratified sandstone first decreased and then increased. At different α, UCS and E of stratified limestone were larger than that of stratified sandstone, ε1p and μ of stratified limestone were smaller than that of stratified sandstone. For stratified limestone, anisotropy coefficient of μ was the largest and anisotropy coefficient of E was the smallest. For stratified sandstone, anisotropy coefficient of ε1p was the largest and anisotropy coefficient of E was the smallest. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone and sandstone was approaching for UCS. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone was larger than stratified sandstone for ε1p and μ. Anisotropy degree of stratified limestone was smaller than stratified sandstone for E. The failure category of stratified limestone and sandstone at different α was quite different. Due to differences in failure mode, the morphology and distribution characteristics of micro-cracks along the sample height showed a significant difference. With the increasing α, volume fraction (VF) and the maximum area fraction (AF) first decreased and then increased for stratified limestone, and showed no obvious change trend for stratified sandstone. At α = 0º, 30º, 90º, VF and the maximum AF of stratified limestone were significantly larger than that of stratified sandstone. At α = 60º, VF and the maximum AF of stratified sandstone were larger than that of stratified limestone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
层理面倾角及岩性对层状岩石单轴压缩力学及微破坏行为的影响
为了研究层状岩石的力学和微观破坏行为,对不同层理面倾角(α)的层状灰岩和砂岩进行了一系列单轴压缩和CT扫描试验。实验结果表明:随着α的增大,层状灰岩和砂岩的单轴抗压强度(UCS)、峰值应变(ε1p)、泊松比(μ)均先减小后增大,层状灰岩的弹性模量(E)不断增大,层状砂岩的E先减小后增大。在不同α、UCS和E值下,层状灰岩的α、UCS和E值大于层状砂岩,ε1p和μ值小于层状砂岩。对于层状灰岩,各向异性系数μ最大,E最小。对于层状砂岩,ε1p各向异性系数最大,E各向异性系数最小。层状灰岩和砂岩的各向异性程度逐渐趋近。在ε1p和μ上,层状灰岩的各向异性程度大于层状砂岩。层状灰岩的各向异性程度e小于层状砂岩,不同α下层状灰岩和砂岩的破坏类型差异较大。由于破坏模式的不同,微裂纹沿试样高度的形貌和分布特征存在显著差异。随着α的增大,层状灰岩的体积分数(VF)和最大面积分数(AF)先减小后增大,而砂岩的变化趋势不明显。在α = 0º、30º、90º时,层状灰岩的VF和最大AF显著大于层状砂岩。在α = 60º时,层状砂岩的VF和最大AF均大于层状灰岩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archive of Applied Mechanics serves as a platform to communicate original research of scholarly value in all branches of theoretical and applied mechanics, i.e., in solid and fluid mechanics, dynamics and vibrations. It focuses on continuum mechanics in general, structural mechanics, biomechanics, micro- and nano-mechanics as well as hydrodynamics. In particular, the following topics are emphasised: thermodynamics of materials, material modeling, multi-physics, mechanical properties of materials, homogenisation, phase transitions, fracture and damage mechanics, vibration, wave propagation experimental mechanics as well as machine learning techniques in the context of applied mechanics.
期刊最新文献
Modeling hybrid polymer ball bearing with elastoplastic contact model and its nonlinear dynamic response Upper bound limit analysis of thin plates with a generalized conforming element formulated by the quadrilateral area coordinate method Continuation fraction perturbation effect on out-of-plane equilibrium points Analysis of thermoelastic dissipation in couple stress-based beams with two-dimensional Moore–Gibson–Thompson heat conduction Modeling method for boundary conditions of the rectangular thin plate by using the power series polynomial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1