Retailer financing: On the dual advantages of profit and information transparency

Ningning Du, Yingchen Yan, Zhongfeng Qin
{"title":"Retailer financing: On the dual advantages of profit and information transparency","authors":"Ningning Du, Yingchen Yan, Zhongfeng Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retailer financing has gained popularity as a means to alleviate capital constraints and enhance supply chain operations. However, its implementation poses significant challenges, particularly in supply chains characterized by asymmetric information, where varying levels of knowledge about product quality complicate decision-making and often diminish the potential benefits of financing. To address this issue, we develop an analytical model to examine the benefits that retailer financing can bring to all parties, especially whether it can incentivize an informed firm to initiatively share information in the presence of asymmetric quality information. First, we present that retailer financing can lead to a “win–win–win” situation for the manufacturer, retailer and consumers, as the firms’ capital flows within the whole supply chain and boosts the production output. Second, we find that, in the presence of asymmetric quality information between the retailer and manufacturer, the retailer may provide financing services to motivate an informed manufacturer to initiatively share quality information. The strategic information sharing becomes dominant when the manufacturer’s production cost is high and initial capital is moderate. Third, our analysis indicates that the retailer’s willingness to provide financing and the manufacturer’s willingness to initiatively share quality information exert a mutual promotion effect, enhancing information transparency in the supply chain. We also extend our analysis to an alternative game sequence and a competition environment.","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103958","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retailer financing has gained popularity as a means to alleviate capital constraints and enhance supply chain operations. However, its implementation poses significant challenges, particularly in supply chains characterized by asymmetric information, where varying levels of knowledge about product quality complicate decision-making and often diminish the potential benefits of financing. To address this issue, we develop an analytical model to examine the benefits that retailer financing can bring to all parties, especially whether it can incentivize an informed firm to initiatively share information in the presence of asymmetric quality information. First, we present that retailer financing can lead to a “win–win–win” situation for the manufacturer, retailer and consumers, as the firms’ capital flows within the whole supply chain and boosts the production output. Second, we find that, in the presence of asymmetric quality information between the retailer and manufacturer, the retailer may provide financing services to motivate an informed manufacturer to initiatively share quality information. The strategic information sharing becomes dominant when the manufacturer’s production cost is high and initial capital is moderate. Third, our analysis indicates that the retailer’s willingness to provide financing and the manufacturer’s willingness to initiatively share quality information exert a mutual promotion effect, enhancing information transparency in the supply chain. We also extend our analysis to an alternative game sequence and a competition environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
零售商融资:论利润与信息透明的双重优势
零售商融资作为缓解资金约束和加强供应链运作的一种手段已经受到欢迎。然而,它的实施带来了重大挑战,特别是在以信息不对称为特征的供应链中,对产品质量的不同知识水平使决策复杂化,并经常减少融资的潜在利益。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个分析模型来检验零售商融资可以给各方带来的利益,特别是它是否可以激励知情的公司在不对称质量信息存在的情况下主动共享信息。首先,我们提出零售商融资可以导致制造商、零售商和消费者的“三赢”局面,因为企业的资本在整个供应链中流动并提高了生产产量。其次,我们发现,当零售商和制造商之间存在不对称的质量信息时,零售商可能会提供融资服务来激励知情的制造商主动共享质量信息。当制造商的生产成本较高且初始资金适中时,战略信息共享成为主导。第三,我们的分析表明,零售商提供融资的意愿和制造商主动分享质量信息的意愿相互促进,提高了供应链的信息透明度。我们还将分析扩展到另一种游戏序列和竞争环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Designing hub-based regional transportation networks with service level constraints Enhancing carsharing pricing and operations through integrated choice models PTB: A deep reinforcement learning method for flexible logistics service combination problem with spatial-temporal constraint Should live streaming be adopted for agricultural supply chain considering platform’s quality improvement and blockchain support? Returns management in a supply chain considering freight insurance and consumer disappointment aversion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1