Genetic Ancestry–Based Differences in Biomarker-Based Eligibility for Precision Oncology Therapies

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JAMA Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5794
Kanika Arora, Sarah P. Suehnholz, Hongxin Zhang, Irina Ostrovnaya, Ritika Kundra, Subhiksha Nandakumar, Moriah H. Nissan, A. Rose Brannon, Chaitanya Bandlamudi, Marc Ladanyi, Alexander Drilon, Carol L. Brown, David B. Solit, Nikolaus Schultz, Michael F. Berger, Debyani Chakravarty
{"title":"Genetic Ancestry–Based Differences in Biomarker-Based Eligibility for Precision Oncology Therapies","authors":"Kanika Arora, Sarah P. Suehnholz, Hongxin Zhang, Irina Ostrovnaya, Ritika Kundra, Subhiksha Nandakumar, Moriah H. Nissan, A. Rose Brannon, Chaitanya Bandlamudi, Marc Ladanyi, Alexander Drilon, Carol L. Brown, David B. Solit, Nikolaus Schultz, Michael F. Berger, Debyani Chakravarty","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceAlthough differences in the prevalence of key cancer-specific somatic mutations as a function of genetic ancestry among patients with cancer has been well-established, few studies have addressed the practical clinical implications of these differences for the growing number of biomarker-driven treatments.ObjectiveTo determine if the approval of precision oncology therapies has benefited patients with cancer from various ancestral backgrounds equally over time.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA retrospective analysis of samples from patients with solid cancers who underwent clinical sequencing using the integrated mutation profiling of actionable cancer targets (MSK-IMPACT) assay between January 2014 and December 2022 was carried out. The annual fraction of patients per ancestral group with at least 1 level 1 biomarker was calculated for FDA drug approvals from January 1998 to December 2023. Analysis began in January 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresFor each patient, genetic ancestry was quantitatively inferred, and patients were grouped based on predominant reference ancestry. OncoKB was used to identify all Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–recognized somatic biomarkers associated with FDA-approved therapies (level 1 biomarkers) in each tumor sample.ResultsOverall, the study included 59 433 patients. The approval of the <jats:italic>EGFR</jats:italic>-tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib for patients with <jats:italic>EGFR</jats:italic>-mutant lung cancers in 2013 disproportionately benefited patients of East Asian and South Asian ancestries, leading to higher patient fractions with level 1 biomarkers in these ancestral groups compared with other populations. Although the increase in precision oncology drug approvals from 2019 to 2020 had a notable positive impact on clinical actionability for patients of European ancestry, patients of African ancestry had the lowest fraction of level 1 biomarkers compared with other groups from 2019 onward.Conclusion and RelevanceThis study systematically assessed and compared temporal changes in genomic biomarker-based eligibility for precision oncology therapies as a function of inferred genetic ancestry derived from DNA sequencing data. Despite the accelerated rate of FDA approvals for precision oncology therapies over the past decade, measurable differences in biomarker-based drug eligibility among patient ancestral groups exist. These differences may exacerbate the systemic disparities in clinical outcomes in patients of African ancestry due to existing deficiencies in their access to cancer care.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceAlthough differences in the prevalence of key cancer-specific somatic mutations as a function of genetic ancestry among patients with cancer has been well-established, few studies have addressed the practical clinical implications of these differences for the growing number of biomarker-driven treatments.ObjectiveTo determine if the approval of precision oncology therapies has benefited patients with cancer from various ancestral backgrounds equally over time.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA retrospective analysis of samples from patients with solid cancers who underwent clinical sequencing using the integrated mutation profiling of actionable cancer targets (MSK-IMPACT) assay between January 2014 and December 2022 was carried out. The annual fraction of patients per ancestral group with at least 1 level 1 biomarker was calculated for FDA drug approvals from January 1998 to December 2023. Analysis began in January 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresFor each patient, genetic ancestry was quantitatively inferred, and patients were grouped based on predominant reference ancestry. OncoKB was used to identify all Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–recognized somatic biomarkers associated with FDA-approved therapies (level 1 biomarkers) in each tumor sample.ResultsOverall, the study included 59 433 patients. The approval of the EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers in 2013 disproportionately benefited patients of East Asian and South Asian ancestries, leading to higher patient fractions with level 1 biomarkers in these ancestral groups compared with other populations. Although the increase in precision oncology drug approvals from 2019 to 2020 had a notable positive impact on clinical actionability for patients of European ancestry, patients of African ancestry had the lowest fraction of level 1 biomarkers compared with other groups from 2019 onward.Conclusion and RelevanceThis study systematically assessed and compared temporal changes in genomic biomarker-based eligibility for precision oncology therapies as a function of inferred genetic ancestry derived from DNA sequencing data. Despite the accelerated rate of FDA approvals for precision oncology therapies over the past decade, measurable differences in biomarker-based drug eligibility among patient ancestral groups exist. These differences may exacerbate the systemic disparities in clinical outcomes in patients of African ancestry due to existing deficiencies in their access to cancer care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于生物标志物的精准肿瘤治疗资格的遗传血统差异
尽管癌症患者中关键癌症特异性体细胞突变的患病率差异作为遗传祖先的功能已经得到证实,但很少有研究解决这些差异对越来越多的生物标志物驱动治疗的实际临床意义。目的确定精确肿瘤疗法的批准是否随着时间的推移使不同祖先背景的癌症患者同样受益。设计、环境和参与者对2014年1月至2022年12月期间使用可操作癌症靶点综合突变谱(MSK-IMPACT)测定法进行临床测序的实体癌患者样本进行回顾性分析。计算1998年1月至2023年12月FDA药物批准的每个祖先组中至少有1个1级生物标志物的患者的年比例。分析开始于2024年1月。对于每位患者,定量推断遗传血统,并根据主要参考血统对患者进行分组。OncoKB用于识别每个肿瘤样本中所有FDA认可的与FDA批准的治疗相关的体细胞生物标志物(1级生物标志物)。结果共纳入59 433例患者。2013年批准用于egfr突变型肺癌患者的egfr -酪氨酸激酶抑制剂厄洛替尼(erlotinib)对东亚和南亚血统的患者格外有利,与其他人群相比,这些祖先群体中具有1级生物标志物的患者比例更高。尽管从2019年到2020年,精准肿瘤药物批准的增加对欧洲血统患者的临床可操作性产生了显著的积极影响,但从2019年起,与其他群体相比,非洲血统患者的1级生物标志物比例最低。结论和相关性本研究系统地评估和比较了基于基因组生物标志物的精确肿瘤治疗资格的时间变化,作为从DNA测序数据推断的遗传祖先的功能。尽管在过去十年中,FDA对精确肿瘤治疗的批准速度加快,但在患者祖先群体中,基于生物标志物的药物资格存在可测量的差异。这些差异可能会加剧非洲裔患者临床结果的系统性差异,因为他们在获得癌症治疗方面存在缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Oncology
JAMA Oncology Medicine-Oncology
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: JAMA Oncology is an international peer-reviewed journal that serves as the leading publication for scientists, clinicians, and trainees working in the field of oncology. It is part of the JAMA Network, a collection of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Intratumoral Injection of mRNA-2752 and Pembrolizumab for High-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Incidence by Sex and Age in the US Overcoming Barriers to Make Patient-Reported Outcome Collection the Standard of Care in Oncology. Biomarker-Directed Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review. Genetic Ancestry–Based Differences in Biomarker-Based Eligibility for Precision Oncology Therapies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1