Quality of Nursing Care: Addressing Sexuality as Part of Prostate Cancer Management, an Umbrella Review

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1111/jan.16703
Catherine Neenan, Anna V. Chatzi
{"title":"Quality of Nursing Care: Addressing Sexuality as Part of Prostate Cancer Management, an Umbrella Review","authors":"Catherine Neenan, Anna V. Chatzi","doi":"10.1111/jan.16703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundSexuality is a fundamental aspect of health and wellbeing. The management of prostate cancer can result in erectile dysfunction and body feminisation, resulting in loss of masculinity and alterations of body image. Prostate cancer patients identify sexuality as an unmet need and report little or no communication with their healthcare providers on the topic.AimThis umbrella review aims to determine the barriers that may preclude nurses from discussing sexuality with prostate cancer patients.DesignAn umbrella review of systematic review studies was undertaken using the PRISMA guidelines.MethodFive databases were comprehensively searched, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane and Prospero, from October 1, 2013 to December 1, 2023, using the defined criteria. A total of 11 systematic reviews were included in this review consisting of 10 with quantitative and 1 with quantitative/mixed methods approach.ResultsThis study identified common themes, which were categorised into four groups: (a) lack of training and education, (b) age and years of clinical experience of nurses, (c) personal values and attitudes and (d) organisational factors. These factors contribute to why nurses feel unprepared and admit to not having adequate knowledge or expertise to have this discussion.ConclusionThe findings of this study illustrate that nurses require specialised communication skills to manage sensitive discussion with patients. Education is crucial to facilitate and empower nurses to discuss sexuality with their patients. Developing a pathway to specialist referrals will encourage nurses to address this with their patients.No Patient or Public ContributionFor the preparation of this paper, no direct involvement of patients or public has been deemed applicable to this work. This is an umbrella review paper.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSexuality is a fundamental aspect of health and wellbeing. The management of prostate cancer can result in erectile dysfunction and body feminisation, resulting in loss of masculinity and alterations of body image. Prostate cancer patients identify sexuality as an unmet need and report little or no communication with their healthcare providers on the topic.AimThis umbrella review aims to determine the barriers that may preclude nurses from discussing sexuality with prostate cancer patients.DesignAn umbrella review of systematic review studies was undertaken using the PRISMA guidelines.MethodFive databases were comprehensively searched, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane and Prospero, from October 1, 2013 to December 1, 2023, using the defined criteria. A total of 11 systematic reviews were included in this review consisting of 10 with quantitative and 1 with quantitative/mixed methods approach.ResultsThis study identified common themes, which were categorised into four groups: (a) lack of training and education, (b) age and years of clinical experience of nurses, (c) personal values and attitudes and (d) organisational factors. These factors contribute to why nurses feel unprepared and admit to not having adequate knowledge or expertise to have this discussion.ConclusionThe findings of this study illustrate that nurses require specialised communication skills to manage sensitive discussion with patients. Education is crucial to facilitate and empower nurses to discuss sexuality with their patients. Developing a pathway to specialist referrals will encourage nurses to address this with their patients.No Patient or Public ContributionFor the preparation of this paper, no direct involvement of patients or public has been deemed applicable to this work. This is an umbrella review paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理质量:解决性作为前列腺癌管理的一部分,一个概括性的回顾
性是健康和幸福的一个基本方面。前列腺癌的治疗会导致勃起功能障碍和身体女性化,导致男性气概的丧失和身体形象的改变。前列腺癌患者认为性是一种未满足的需求,并且很少或根本没有与他们的医疗保健提供者就这一主题进行沟通。目的:本综述旨在确定可能妨碍护士与前列腺癌患者讨论性行为的障碍。设计采用PRISMA指南对系统评价研究进行总括性评价。方法对2013年10月1日至2023年12月1日的5个数据库(CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Cochrane和Prospero)进行综合检索。本综述共纳入11篇系统评价,其中10篇采用定量方法,1篇采用定量/混合方法。结果本研究确定了常见的主题,并将其分为四组:(a)缺乏培训和教育,(b)护士的年龄和临床经验,(c)个人价值观和态度以及(d)组织因素。这些因素导致了为什么护士感到措手不及,并承认没有足够的知识或专业知识来进行这种讨论。结论本研究结果表明,护士需要专门的沟通技巧来管理与患者的敏感讨论。教育对于促进和授权护士与患者讨论性行为至关重要。建立专家转诊的途径将鼓励护士与病人一起解决这个问题。没有患者或公众的贡献在本文的准备过程中,没有患者或公众的直接参与被认为适用于这项工作。这是一篇概括性综述论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in Disease Burden, Symptom Burden, and Quality of Life Among People Living With Heart Failure and Multimorbidity: Cross‐Sectional Study How Hiring Process Satisfaction Influences Nursing Staff's Willingness to Recommend Their Organisation: A Mixed Methods Study Predictive Model for Hypoglycaemia Risk in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients During the Peri-Colonoscopy Period: A Retrospective Cohort Study Monitoring the Sustainability of a Breastfeeding Guideline During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study Factors Influencing Nurses' Culturally Competent Cancer Care for LGBT Individuals in Taiwan: A Qualitative Study Applying the Socio-Ecological Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1