Stream Discharge Determinations Using Slug Additions and Specific Conductance

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water Resources Research Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1029/2024wr037771
R. Blaine McCleskey, Robert L. Runkel, Sheila F. Murphy, David A. Roth
{"title":"Stream Discharge Determinations Using Slug Additions and Specific Conductance","authors":"R. Blaine McCleskey, Robert L. Runkel, Sheila F. Murphy, David A. Roth","doi":"10.1029/2024wr037771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stream discharge is often determined by wading the stream and measuring the point velocity at fixed widths and depths. However, there are conditions when wading measurements are not safe or the measurements are poor because of high turbulence, rocky streambeds, non-standard velocity distributions, shallow or sheet flow, aquatic plants, or inaccessibility due to ice. Under these conditions, it is often preferable to determine discharge using salt slug addition and downstream measurement of salt concentration with time. A new method for determining stream discharge using specific conductance as a surrogate for salt concentrations is presented. The method adapts an approach that accurately calculates the specific conductance by utilizing ionic molal conductivities to determine the concentration of salt. The method was applied at four mountainous stream sites where a total of twenty-nine slug-additions were performed. The discharge determined from the new method was compared to four alternative methods including discharge from continuous injection, slug addition with discrete sample calibration, wading measurements with velocity measurement, and a stream gage. The discharge ranged from 21.5 to 778 L/s and the median difference between the new method and the traditional methods was −0.01%. Additionally, the p-value (0.75) determined from a paired <i>t</i>-test indicates that there is no significant difference between the discharge determined from the new and alternative discharge methods. The primary advantage of the new method is that it obviates the need to collect and analyze discrete samples to accurately quantify the specific conductance-salt surrogate relationship, allowing for rapid, low-cost determination of discharge.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037771","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stream discharge is often determined by wading the stream and measuring the point velocity at fixed widths and depths. However, there are conditions when wading measurements are not safe or the measurements are poor because of high turbulence, rocky streambeds, non-standard velocity distributions, shallow or sheet flow, aquatic plants, or inaccessibility due to ice. Under these conditions, it is often preferable to determine discharge using salt slug addition and downstream measurement of salt concentration with time. A new method for determining stream discharge using specific conductance as a surrogate for salt concentrations is presented. The method adapts an approach that accurately calculates the specific conductance by utilizing ionic molal conductivities to determine the concentration of salt. The method was applied at four mountainous stream sites where a total of twenty-nine slug-additions were performed. The discharge determined from the new method was compared to four alternative methods including discharge from continuous injection, slug addition with discrete sample calibration, wading measurements with velocity measurement, and a stream gage. The discharge ranged from 21.5 to 778 L/s and the median difference between the new method and the traditional methods was −0.01%. Additionally, the p-value (0.75) determined from a paired t-test indicates that there is no significant difference between the discharge determined from the new and alternative discharge methods. The primary advantage of the new method is that it obviates the need to collect and analyze discrete samples to accurately quantify the specific conductance-salt surrogate relationship, allowing for rapid, low-cost determination of discharge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
期刊最新文献
The Influences of Evaporation and Aquitard on Groundwater Dynamics and Solute Transport in a Tidal Flat With a Slope Break A New Capillary and Adsorption‒Force Model Predicting Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil During Freeze‒thaw Processes Stream Discharge Determinations Using Slug Additions and Specific Conductance Experimental Analyses of Pore-Size Dependent Biomineralization in Porous Media Under Various Flow Rate and Bacterial Density Scenarios A Half-Order Derivative Based Model of Lake Heat Storage Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1