Face stability analysis of opposite-excavation tunnels: influences of face distance and pore water pressure

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-12044-9
Zhizhen Liu, Ping Cao, Kaihui Li, Jingjing Meng
{"title":"Face stability analysis of opposite-excavation tunnels: influences of face distance and pore water pressure","authors":"Zhizhen Liu,&nbsp;Ping Cao,&nbsp;Kaihui Li,&nbsp;Jingjing Meng","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12044-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Appropriate support pressure is crucial for maintaining the face stability of tunnels constructed using the opposite-excavation method. In this study, two failure mechanisms are constructed to determine the appropriate support pressure on the faces of opposite-excavation tunnels, considering the effects of face distance and pore water pressure. Two theoretical models for the limit support pressure of tunnel faces are developed based on the limit equilibrium method, and then validated by simulation results and previous studies. The results show that as the face distance between the opposite-excavation tunnels decreases, the limit support pressure initially increases and then decreases. A critical distance of 20 m is identified, with the corresponding critical limit support pressures of 160 kPa and 325 kPa without and with the influence of pore water pressure, respectively. Additionally, the limit support pressure is found to decrease with cohesion but increase with unit weight. When the face distance exceeds 30 m and without the influence of pore water pressure, a larger support pressure is required to maintain the face stability of tunnel in strata with a larger internal friction angle; conversely, when the face distance is less than 30 m, an opposite trend is observed. Considering the influence of pore water pressure, maintaining the face stability of tunnel in strata with a larger internal friction angle requires a smaller limit support pressure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12044-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Appropriate support pressure is crucial for maintaining the face stability of tunnels constructed using the opposite-excavation method. In this study, two failure mechanisms are constructed to determine the appropriate support pressure on the faces of opposite-excavation tunnels, considering the effects of face distance and pore water pressure. Two theoretical models for the limit support pressure of tunnel faces are developed based on the limit equilibrium method, and then validated by simulation results and previous studies. The results show that as the face distance between the opposite-excavation tunnels decreases, the limit support pressure initially increases and then decreases. A critical distance of 20 m is identified, with the corresponding critical limit support pressures of 160 kPa and 325 kPa without and with the influence of pore water pressure, respectively. Additionally, the limit support pressure is found to decrease with cohesion but increase with unit weight. When the face distance exceeds 30 m and without the influence of pore water pressure, a larger support pressure is required to maintain the face stability of tunnel in strata with a larger internal friction angle; conversely, when the face distance is less than 30 m, an opposite trend is observed. Considering the influence of pore water pressure, maintaining the face stability of tunnel in strata with a larger internal friction angle requires a smaller limit support pressure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对开挖隧道工作面稳定性分析:工作面距离和孔隙水压力的影响
适当的支护压力对反开挖隧道的工作面稳定性至关重要。本研究在考虑工作面距离和孔隙水压力影响的情况下,构建了两种破坏机制,确定了相对开挖隧道工作面适宜的支护压力。基于极限平衡法,建立了两种巷道工作面极限支护压力的理论模型,并结合仿真结果和前人研究成果进行了验证。结果表明:随着对开挖隧道间工作面距离的减小,极限支护压力先增大后减小;确定临界距离为20 m,不受孔隙水压力影响的临界极限支撑压力为160 kPa,受孔隙水压力影响的临界极限支撑压力为325 kPa。极限支撑压力随黏聚力的增大而减小,随单位重量的增大而增大。当工作面距离超过30m且不受孔隙水压力影响时,在内摩擦角较大的地层中,需要较大的支护压力来维持巷道工作面稳定;相反,当面距小于30 m时,观察到相反的趋势。考虑孔隙水压力的影响,在较大内摩擦角地层中,维持巷道工作面稳定需要较小的极限支护压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of EPIK, DRASTIC, and DRASTIC-LUC methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment in karst aquifers of the Western Amazon Basin Characterization of spatial and temporal distribution of evapotranspiration in the Dawen River Basin and analysis of driving factors Comparative study of multivariate hybrid neural networks for global sea level prediction through 2050 Non-linear analysis of soil 222Rn time series recorded at Jiaosi in north-east Taiwan for possible earthquake precursor study Deep geological disposal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1