{"title":"Face stability analysis of opposite-excavation tunnels: influences of face distance and pore water pressure","authors":"Zhizhen Liu, Ping Cao, Kaihui Li, Jingjing Meng","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12044-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Appropriate support pressure is crucial for maintaining the face stability of tunnels constructed using the opposite-excavation method. In this study, two failure mechanisms are constructed to determine the appropriate support pressure on the faces of opposite-excavation tunnels, considering the effects of face distance and pore water pressure. Two theoretical models for the limit support pressure of tunnel faces are developed based on the limit equilibrium method, and then validated by simulation results and previous studies. The results show that as the face distance between the opposite-excavation tunnels decreases, the limit support pressure initially increases and then decreases. A critical distance of 20 m is identified, with the corresponding critical limit support pressures of 160 kPa and 325 kPa without and with the influence of pore water pressure, respectively. Additionally, the limit support pressure is found to decrease with cohesion but increase with unit weight. When the face distance exceeds 30 m and without the influence of pore water pressure, a larger support pressure is required to maintain the face stability of tunnel in strata with a larger internal friction angle; conversely, when the face distance is less than 30 m, an opposite trend is observed. Considering the influence of pore water pressure, maintaining the face stability of tunnel in strata with a larger internal friction angle requires a smaller limit support pressure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12044-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Appropriate support pressure is crucial for maintaining the face stability of tunnels constructed using the opposite-excavation method. In this study, two failure mechanisms are constructed to determine the appropriate support pressure on the faces of opposite-excavation tunnels, considering the effects of face distance and pore water pressure. Two theoretical models for the limit support pressure of tunnel faces are developed based on the limit equilibrium method, and then validated by simulation results and previous studies. The results show that as the face distance between the opposite-excavation tunnels decreases, the limit support pressure initially increases and then decreases. A critical distance of 20 m is identified, with the corresponding critical limit support pressures of 160 kPa and 325 kPa without and with the influence of pore water pressure, respectively. Additionally, the limit support pressure is found to decrease with cohesion but increase with unit weight. When the face distance exceeds 30 m and without the influence of pore water pressure, a larger support pressure is required to maintain the face stability of tunnel in strata with a larger internal friction angle; conversely, when the face distance is less than 30 m, an opposite trend is observed. Considering the influence of pore water pressure, maintaining the face stability of tunnel in strata with a larger internal friction angle requires a smaller limit support pressure.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.