Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002677
Ankai Zuo, Chengfei Gao, Qiufeng Jia, Meirong Zhang, Ting Fu, Tieshan Li, Lin Wang
{"title":"Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ankai Zuo, Chengfei Gao, Qiufeng Jia, Meirong Zhang, Ting Fu, Tieshan Li, Lin Wang","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroids in treating plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief, foot function, and plantar fascia thickness to identify the optimal treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A comprehensive search of medical databases was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, utilizing an extensive keyword strategy. Inclusion criteria encompassed prospective randomized controlled trials involving adult patients with plantar fasciitis treated with local platelet-rich plasma or corticosteroid injections, specifically assessing outcomes such as the visual analog scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scores, and plantar fascia thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 24 randomized controlled trials with 1653 participants. Platelet-rich plasma injections yielded significantly better visual analog scale scores compared to corticosteroid injections at 3 mos ( P = 0.03) and 6 mos ( P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 mo ( P = 0.12) and 12 mos ( P = 0.08). American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scores demonstrated that platelet-rich plasma was superior to corticosteroid at 3 ( P = 0.05), 6 ( P < 0.001), and 12 mos ( P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 mo ( P = 0.31). Regarding plantar fascia thickness, there were no significant differences between platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid at 1-1.5 mos ( P = 0.18), 3 mos ( P = 0.64), and 6 mos ( P = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Platelet-rich plasma injections offer superior pain control compared to corticosteroids in the medium term (3-6 mos) but not in the short term or at 1 yr.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"613-621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroids in treating plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief, foot function, and plantar fascia thickness to identify the optimal treatment approach.

Design: A comprehensive search of medical databases was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, utilizing an extensive keyword strategy. Inclusion criteria encompassed prospective randomized controlled trials involving adult patients with plantar fasciitis treated with local platelet-rich plasma or corticosteroid injections, specifically assessing outcomes such as the visual analog scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scores, and plantar fascia thickness.

Results: The meta-analysis included 24 randomized controlled trials with 1653 participants. Platelet-rich plasma injections yielded significantly better visual analog scale scores compared to corticosteroid injections at 3 mos ( P = 0.03) and 6 mos ( P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 mo ( P = 0.12) and 12 mos ( P = 0.08). American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scores demonstrated that platelet-rich plasma was superior to corticosteroid at 3 ( P = 0.05), 6 ( P < 0.001), and 12 mos ( P < 0.001), with no significant differences at 1 mo ( P = 0.31). Regarding plantar fascia thickness, there were no significant differences between platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid at 1-1.5 mos ( P = 0.18), 3 mos ( P = 0.64), and 6 mos ( P = 0.05).

Conclusions: Platelet-rich plasma injections offer superior pain control compared to corticosteroids in the medium term (3-6 mos) but not in the short term or at 1 yr.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇治疗足底筋膜炎:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本研究旨在比较富血小板血浆(PRP)和皮质类固醇(CS)治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效,重点关注疼痛缓解、足部功能和足底筋膜厚度,以确定最佳治疗方法。设计:根据PRISMA指南,利用广泛的关键字策略,对医学数据库进行了全面搜索。纳入标准包括前瞻性随机对照试验,涉及接受局部PRP或CS注射治疗的成年足底筋膜炎患者,具体评估结果如视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)评分和足底筋膜厚度。结果:meta分析纳入24项随机对照试验,共1653名受试者。PRP注射在3个月(P = 0.03)和6个月(P < 0.001)时的VAS评分明显高于CS注射(P = 0.08),而在1个月(P = 0.12)和12个月(P = 0.08)时无显著差异。AOFAS评分显示PRP在3个月(P = 0.05)、6个月(P < 0.001)和12个月(P < 0.001)时优于CS, 1个月时差异无统计学意义(P = 0.31)。在足底筋膜厚度方面,PRP与CS在1-1.5个月(P = 0.18)、3个月(P = 0.64)、6个月(P = 0.05)时差异无统计学意义。结论:与皮质类固醇相比,PRP注射在中期(3-6个月)提供了更好的疼痛控制,但在短期或一年内则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
期刊最新文献
Mechanics in Motion: Dynamic Ultrasonography Identifies Osteophyte-Induced Gracilis Impingement. Virtual Reality and Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training in Gait Rehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. Perceived Impact on the Daily Lives of Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treated with Nusinersen: A Natural Language Processing Approach. The Interlimb Asymmetry-Locomotor Capacity Nexus: A Two-Year Longitudinal Investigation in Ambulatory Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy. Clinical Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Lower Limb Motor Function, Balance and Gait in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized, sham-controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1