Guidance for an Effective Approach to Integrated Evidence Planning in a Dynamic World

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3556
Jens Grueger, Vaidyanathan Srikant
{"title":"Guidance for an Effective Approach to Integrated Evidence Planning in a Dynamic World","authors":"Jens Grueger,&nbsp;Vaidyanathan Srikant","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The value of a medicine is defined by its impact on patients, caregivers, health system, and society. A pharmaceutical company will generate evidence to demonstrate this value in various studies, including randomized clinical trials, non-interventional and observational studies, real-world data analyses, modeling, and simulation. The quality and strength of the evidence supporting a medicine's effectiveness, safety and product quality will drive decisions by healthcare system stakeholders for marketing authorization (regulatory authorities). Additional evidence of comparative clinical, humanistic, economic, and societal value of the medicine will be critical for reimbursement coverage by HTA (health technology assessment) bodies and payers, guideline inclusion by clinical societies, and ultimately the treatment decision between a patient and their healthcare provider (HCP). The purpose of this article is to provide practical guidance for an effective approach to evidence planning for pharmaceutical companies. In the first section, we give a brief overview of the requirements for evidence generation from the perspectives of healthcare system decision makers, key functions involved in evidence generation within a pharmaceutical company, and different archetypes of products. We then discuss how a company can implement effective integrated evidence planning across the lifecycle of a product. We also review how requirements are likely to evolve given recent changes in major healthcare system regulations, such as Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) drug price negotiations in the US and EU HTA Regulation (HTAR) in Europe, and finally provide some practical recommendations of how to start implementing a new integrated evidence approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"117 4","pages":"920-926"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.3556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The value of a medicine is defined by its impact on patients, caregivers, health system, and society. A pharmaceutical company will generate evidence to demonstrate this value in various studies, including randomized clinical trials, non-interventional and observational studies, real-world data analyses, modeling, and simulation. The quality and strength of the evidence supporting a medicine's effectiveness, safety and product quality will drive decisions by healthcare system stakeholders for marketing authorization (regulatory authorities). Additional evidence of comparative clinical, humanistic, economic, and societal value of the medicine will be critical for reimbursement coverage by HTA (health technology assessment) bodies and payers, guideline inclusion by clinical societies, and ultimately the treatment decision between a patient and their healthcare provider (HCP). The purpose of this article is to provide practical guidance for an effective approach to evidence planning for pharmaceutical companies. In the first section, we give a brief overview of the requirements for evidence generation from the perspectives of healthcare system decision makers, key functions involved in evidence generation within a pharmaceutical company, and different archetypes of products. We then discuss how a company can implement effective integrated evidence planning across the lifecycle of a product. We also review how requirements are likely to evolve given recent changes in major healthcare system regulations, such as Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) drug price negotiations in the US and EU HTA Regulation (HTAR) in Europe, and finally provide some practical recommendations of how to start implementing a new integrated evidence approach.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态世界中综合证据规划的有效方法指南。
一种药物的价值取决于它对患者、护理人员、卫生系统和社会的影响。制药公司将在各种研究中提供证据来证明这一价值,包括随机临床试验、非介入性和观察性研究、真实世界数据分析、建模和模拟。支持药物有效性、安全性和产品质量的证据的质量和强度将推动医疗保健系统利益相关者对上市许可(监管机构)的决策。对于HTA(卫生技术评估)机构和支付方的报销范围、临床学会的指南纳入,以及最终患者与其医疗保健提供者(HCP)之间的治疗决策,关于药物的比较临床、人文、经济和社会价值的其他证据将至关重要。本文的目的是为制药公司提供有效的证据规划方法提供实践指导。在第一部分中,我们从医疗保健系统决策者的角度,简要概述了证据生成的需求,制药公司中证据生成涉及的关键功能,以及不同的产品原型。然后,我们将讨论公司如何在产品的整个生命周期内实施有效的综合证据计划。我们还回顾了最近主要医疗保健系统法规的变化,如美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)药品价格谈判和欧洲欧盟HTA法规(HTAR),最后提供了一些关于如何开始实施新的综合证据方法的实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Quantitative Systems Toxicology Modeling with DILIsym to Support Phase 3 Dose Selection for Fezolinetant. Pharmacogenomics of Major Depressive Disorder in Indigenous Amazonian Populations. Modeling Supports Combinatorial Effects Between Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent Opioid-Induced Cardiac Arrest. Assessing the "Drug Loss" and "Drug Lag" for Rare Diseases in China: A Comparative Analysis with the United States (2001-2024). Bridging the Regulatory Chasm in Investigator-Initiated Human Subject Cannabis Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1