Developing an EEG-based model to predict awakening after cardiac arrest using partial processing with the BIS Engine.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005369
Samuel B Snider, Bradley J Molyneaux, Anarghya Murthy, Quinn Rademaker, Hafeez Rajwani, Benjamin M Scirica, Jong Woo Lee, Christopher Connor
{"title":"Developing an EEG-based model to predict awakening after cardiac arrest using partial processing with the BIS Engine.","authors":"Samuel B Snider, Bradley J Molyneaux, Anarghya Murthy, Quinn Rademaker, Hafeez Rajwani, Benjamin M Scirica, Jong Woo Lee, Christopher Connor","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest is a challenging and high-stakes endeavor. We sought to determine whether internal EEG subparameters extracted by the Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor, a device commonly used to estimate depth-of-anesthesia intraoperatively, could be repurposed to predict recovery of consciousness after cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we trained a 3-layer neural network to predict recovery of consciousness to the point of command following versus not based on 48 hours of continuous EEG recordings in 315 comatose patients admitted to a single US academic medical center after cardiac arrest (Derivation cohort: N=181; Validation cohort: N=134). Continuous EEGs were partially processed into subparameters using virtualized emulation of the BIS Engine (i.e., the internal software of the BIS monitor) applied to signals from the frontotemporal leads of the standard 10-20 EEG montage. Our model was trained on hourly-averaged measurements of these internal subparameters. We compared this model's performance to the modified Westhall qualitative EEG scoring framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum prognostic accuracy in the Derivation Cohort was achieved using a network trained on only four BIS subparameters (inverse burst suppression ratio, mean spectral power density, gamma power, and theta/delta power). In a held-out sample of 134 patients, our model outperformed current state-of-the-art qualitative EEG assessment techniques at predicting recovery of consciousness (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.86, accuracy: 0.87, sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.88, positive predictive value: 0.71, negative predictive value: 0.94). Gamma band power has not been previously reported as a correlate of recovery potential after cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients comatose after cardiac arrest, four EEG features calculated internally by the BIS Engine were repurposed by a compact neural network to achieve a prognostic accuracy superior to the current clinical qualitative gold-standard, with high sensitivity for recovery. These features hold promise for assessing patients after cardiac arrest.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005369","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest is a challenging and high-stakes endeavor. We sought to determine whether internal EEG subparameters extracted by the Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor, a device commonly used to estimate depth-of-anesthesia intraoperatively, could be repurposed to predict recovery of consciousness after cardiac arrest.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we trained a 3-layer neural network to predict recovery of consciousness to the point of command following versus not based on 48 hours of continuous EEG recordings in 315 comatose patients admitted to a single US academic medical center after cardiac arrest (Derivation cohort: N=181; Validation cohort: N=134). Continuous EEGs were partially processed into subparameters using virtualized emulation of the BIS Engine (i.e., the internal software of the BIS monitor) applied to signals from the frontotemporal leads of the standard 10-20 EEG montage. Our model was trained on hourly-averaged measurements of these internal subparameters. We compared this model's performance to the modified Westhall qualitative EEG scoring framework.

Results: Maximum prognostic accuracy in the Derivation Cohort was achieved using a network trained on only four BIS subparameters (inverse burst suppression ratio, mean spectral power density, gamma power, and theta/delta power). In a held-out sample of 134 patients, our model outperformed current state-of-the-art qualitative EEG assessment techniques at predicting recovery of consciousness (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.86, accuracy: 0.87, sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.88, positive predictive value: 0.71, negative predictive value: 0.94). Gamma band power has not been previously reported as a correlate of recovery potential after cardiac arrest.

Conclusions: In patients comatose after cardiac arrest, four EEG features calculated internally by the BIS Engine were repurposed by a compact neural network to achieve a prognostic accuracy superior to the current clinical qualitative gold-standard, with high sensitivity for recovery. These features hold promise for assessing patients after cardiac arrest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发一种基于脑电图的模型,利用BIS引擎的部分处理来预测心脏骤停后的苏醒。
准确预测心脏骤停的昏迷幸存者是一项具有挑战性和高风险的努力。我们试图确定由双谱指数(BIS)监测器提取的内部脑电图子参数(一种通常用于估计术中麻醉深度的设备)是否可以重新用于预测心脏骤停后的意识恢复。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们训练了一个3层神经网络来预测315例心脏骤停后昏迷患者在48小时连续脑电图记录的基础上恢复到指令点的意识。验证队列:N=134)。使用BIS引擎(即BIS监视器的内部软件)的虚拟化仿真,将连续脑电图部分处理成子参数,应用于标准10-20脑电图蒙太奇的额颞叶导联信号。我们的模型是根据这些内部子参数的每小时平均测量值进行训练的。我们将该模型的性能与改进的Westhall定性脑电图评分框架进行了比较。结果:推导队列的最大预测准确性是通过仅使用四个BIS子参数(逆突发抑制比、平均频谱功率密度、伽马功率和θ / δ功率)训练的网络实现的。在134例患者的样本中,我们的模型在预测意识恢复方面优于目前最先进的定性脑电图评估技术(接受者工作特征曲线下面积:0.86,准确性:0.87,灵敏度:0.83,特异性:0.88,阳性预测值:0.71,阴性预测值:0.94)。伽玛波段功率与心脏骤停后恢复潜力的相关性此前尚未报道。结论:在心脏骤停后昏迷的患者中,BIS Engine内部计算的四个EEG特征通过紧凑的神经网络重新利用,达到了优于当前临床定性金标准的预后准确性,对恢复具有高灵敏度。这些特征为心脏骤停后患者的评估带来了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
期刊最新文献
Genome-wide Study on Propofol Requirements: Reply. Instructions for Obtaining Anesthesiology Continuing Medical Education (CME) Credit. Intersections of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry: Comment. Intersections of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry: Comment. Intersections of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry: Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1