Swin UNETR Segmentation with Automated Geometry Filtering for Biomechanical Modeling of Knee Joint Cartilage.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Annals of Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s10439-024-03675-x
Reza Kakavand, Peyman Tahghighi, Reza Ahmadi, W Brent Edwards, Amin Komeili
{"title":"Swin UNETR Segmentation with Automated Geometry Filtering for Biomechanical Modeling of Knee Joint Cartilage.","authors":"Reza Kakavand, Peyman Tahghighi, Reza Ahmadi, W Brent Edwards, Amin Komeili","doi":"10.1007/s10439-024-03675-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Simulation studies, such as finite element (FE) modeling, offer insights into knee joint biomechanics, which may not be achieved through experimental methods without direct involvement of patients. While generic FE models have been used to predict tissue biomechanics, they overlook variations in population-specific geometry, loading, and material properties. In contrast, subject-specific models account for these factors, delivering enhanced predictive precision but requiring significant effort and time for development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to facilitate subject-specific knee joint FE modeling by integrating an automated cartilage segmentation algorithm using a 3D Swin UNETR. This algorithm provided initial segmentation of knee cartilage, followed by automated geometry filtering to refine surface roughness and continuity. In addition to the standard metrics of image segmentation performance, such as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance, the method's effectiveness was also assessed in FE simulation. Nine pairs of knee cartilage FE models, using manual and automated segmentation methods, were developed to compare the predicted stress and strain responses during gait.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The automated segmentation achieved high Dice similarity coefficients of 89.4% for femoral and 85.1% for tibial cartilage, with a Hausdorff distance of 2.3 mm between the automated and manual segmentation. Mechanical results including maximum principal stress and strain, fluid pressure, fibril strain, and contact area showed no significant differences between the manual and automated FE models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed automated segmentation method in creating accurate knee joint FE models. The automated models developed in this study have been made publicly accessible to support biomechanical modeling and medical image segmentation studies ( https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/dc832g7j5m/1 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03675-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Simulation studies, such as finite element (FE) modeling, offer insights into knee joint biomechanics, which may not be achieved through experimental methods without direct involvement of patients. While generic FE models have been used to predict tissue biomechanics, they overlook variations in population-specific geometry, loading, and material properties. In contrast, subject-specific models account for these factors, delivering enhanced predictive precision but requiring significant effort and time for development.

Methods: This study aimed to facilitate subject-specific knee joint FE modeling by integrating an automated cartilage segmentation algorithm using a 3D Swin UNETR. This algorithm provided initial segmentation of knee cartilage, followed by automated geometry filtering to refine surface roughness and continuity. In addition to the standard metrics of image segmentation performance, such as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance, the method's effectiveness was also assessed in FE simulation. Nine pairs of knee cartilage FE models, using manual and automated segmentation methods, were developed to compare the predicted stress and strain responses during gait.

Results: The automated segmentation achieved high Dice similarity coefficients of 89.4% for femoral and 85.1% for tibial cartilage, with a Hausdorff distance of 2.3 mm between the automated and manual segmentation. Mechanical results including maximum principal stress and strain, fluid pressure, fibril strain, and contact area showed no significant differences between the manual and automated FE models.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed automated segmentation method in creating accurate knee joint FE models. The automated models developed in this study have been made publicly accessible to support biomechanical modeling and medical image segmentation studies ( https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/dc832g7j5m/1 ).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于自动几何滤波的Swin UNETR分割膝关节软骨生物力学建模。
目的:模拟研究,如有限元(FE)建模,提供了对膝关节生物力学的见解,这在没有患者直接参与的情况下可能无法通过实验方法实现。虽然通用有限元模型已被用于预测组织生物力学,但它们忽略了群体特定几何形状、载荷和材料特性的变化。相反,特定于主题的模型考虑了这些因素,提供了增强的预测精度,但需要大量的开发工作和时间。方法:本研究旨在通过使用3D Swin UNETR集成自动软骨分割算法来促进受试者特定的膝关节有限元建模。该算法首先对膝关节软骨进行初始分割,然后进行自动几何滤波以细化表面粗糙度和连续性。除了Dice相似系数(DSC)和Hausdorff距离等图像分割性能的标准指标外,还在有限元仿真中评估了该方法的有效性。采用人工和自动分割方法,建立了9对膝关节软骨有限元模型,比较步态中预测的应力和应变反应。结果:自动分割股骨软骨的Dice相似系数为89.4%,胫骨软骨的Dice相似系数为85.1%,自动分割与人工分割之间的Hausdorff距离为2.3 mm。包括最大主应力和应变、流体压力、原纤维应变和接触面积在内的力学结果显示,手动和自动有限元模型之间没有显著差异。结论:这些发现证明了所提出的自动分割方法在创建准确的膝关节有限元模型方面的有效性。在这项研究中开发的自动化模型已经公开访问,以支持生物力学建模和医学图像分割研究(https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/dc832g7j5m/1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
期刊最新文献
Center of Pressure of Medial Knee Contact Force Predicts Future Transition Risk of Knee Surgery in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Next-Generation Diagnostics: The Role of Wearable Ultrasound and AI in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm 3D Modeling. Correction: Optimising Instrumented Mouthguard Data Analysis: Video Synchronisation Using a Cross-correlation Approach. Enhancing Bioactivity of Titanium-Based Materials Through Chitosan Based Coating and Calcitriol Functionalization. A Novel Valveless Pulsatile Flow Pump for Extracorporeal Blood Circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1