Alexander Novokhodko, Nanye Du, Shaohang Hao, Ziyuan Wang, Zhiquan Shu, Suhail Ahmad, Dayong Gao
{"title":"Predicting the Impact of Polysulfone Dialyzers and Binder Dialysate Flow Rate on Bilirubin Removal.","authors":"Alexander Novokhodko, Nanye Du, Shaohang Hao, Ziyuan Wang, Zhiquan Shu, Suhail Ahmad, Dayong Gao","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11121262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver failure is the 12th leading cause of death worldwide. Protein-bound toxins such as bilirubin are responsible for many complications of the disease. Binder dialysis systems use albumin or another binding molecule in dialysate and detoxifying sorbent columns to remove these toxins. Systems like the molecular adsorbent recirculating system and BioLogic-DT have existed since the 1990s, but survival benefits in randomized controlled trials have not been consistent. New binder dialysis systems, including open albumin dialysis and the Advanced Multi-Organ Replacement system, are being developed. Optimal conditions for binder dialysis have not been established. We developed and validated a computational model of bound solute dialysis. It predicted the impact of changing between two test setups using different polysulfone dialyzers (F3 and F6HPS). We then predicted the impact of varying the dialysate flow rate on toxin removal. We found that bilirubin removal declines with dialysate flow rate. This can be explained through a linear decline in free bilirubin membrane permeability. Our model quantifies this decline through a single parameter (polysulfone dialyzers). Validation for additional dialyzers and flow rates will be needed. This model will benefit clinical trials by predicting optimal dialyzer and flow rate conditions. Accounting for toxin adsorption onto the dialyzer membrane may improve results further.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"11 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11121262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Liver failure is the 12th leading cause of death worldwide. Protein-bound toxins such as bilirubin are responsible for many complications of the disease. Binder dialysis systems use albumin or another binding molecule in dialysate and detoxifying sorbent columns to remove these toxins. Systems like the molecular adsorbent recirculating system and BioLogic-DT have existed since the 1990s, but survival benefits in randomized controlled trials have not been consistent. New binder dialysis systems, including open albumin dialysis and the Advanced Multi-Organ Replacement system, are being developed. Optimal conditions for binder dialysis have not been established. We developed and validated a computational model of bound solute dialysis. It predicted the impact of changing between two test setups using different polysulfone dialyzers (F3 and F6HPS). We then predicted the impact of varying the dialysate flow rate on toxin removal. We found that bilirubin removal declines with dialysate flow rate. This can be explained through a linear decline in free bilirubin membrane permeability. Our model quantifies this decline through a single parameter (polysulfone dialyzers). Validation for additional dialyzers and flow rates will be needed. This model will benefit clinical trials by predicting optimal dialyzer and flow rate conditions. Accounting for toxin adsorption onto the dialyzer membrane may improve results further.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering