Knowledge discovery from database: MRI radiomic features to assess recurrence risk in high-grade meningiomas.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01483-2
Chen Chen, Lifang Hao, Bin Bai, Guijun Zhang
{"title":"Knowledge discovery from database: MRI radiomic features to assess recurrence risk in high-grade meningiomas.","authors":"Chen Chen, Lifang Hao, Bin Bai, Guijun Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01483-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We used knowledge discovery from radiomics of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1C) for assessing relapse risk in patients with high-grade meningiomas (HGMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>279 features were extracted from each ROI including 9 histogram features, 220 Gy-level co-occurrence matrix features, 20 Gy-level run-length matrix features, 5 auto-regressive model features, 20 wavelets transform features and 5 absolute gradient statistics features. The datasets were randomly divided into two groups, the training set (~ 70%) and the test set (~ 30%). Combinations of data preprocessing methods, including normalization (Min-Max, Z-score, Mean), dimensionality reduction (Pearson Correlation Coefficients (PCC)), feature selector (max-Number, cluster) and ten-fold cross-validation were analyzed for their prediction performance. Kaplan-Meier curve, Cox proportional hazards regression model were used and concordance index (C-index), integrated Brier score (IBS) were selected. Model performance was assessed using the C-index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WHO grade, age, gender, histogram (Mean, Perc.90%, Perc.99%), Gray-level co-occurrence matrix (S(3, -3)DifVarnc, S(5, 5)Correlat, S(1, 0)SumEntrp, S(2, -2)InvDfMom), Teta1, WavEnLL_s-2 and GrVariance were identified as the significant recurrence factors. The pipeline using Mean_PCC_Cluster_10 of T1C yielded the highest efficiency with an IBS of 0.170, 0.188, 0.208 and C-index of 0.709, 0.705, 0.602 in the train, test and validation sets, respectively. The pipeline using MinMax_PCC_Cluster_19 of T2WI yielded the highest efficiency with an IBS of 0.189, 0.175, 0.185 and C-index of 0.783, 0.66, 0.649 in the train, test and validation sets. The pipeline using MinMax_PCC_Cluster_13 of T2WI + T1C yielded the highest efficiency with an IBS of 0.152, 0.164, 0.191 and C-index of 0.701, 0.656, 0.593 in the train, test and validation sets, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowledge discovery from MRI radiomic features can slightly help predict recurrence risk in HGMs. T2WI or T1C yielded better efficiency than T2WI + T1C. The parameters with the best power were Mean, Perc.99%, WavEnLL_s-2, Teta1 and GrVariance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11716254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01483-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We used knowledge discovery from radiomics of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1C) for assessing relapse risk in patients with high-grade meningiomas (HGMs).

Methods: 279 features were extracted from each ROI including 9 histogram features, 220 Gy-level co-occurrence matrix features, 20 Gy-level run-length matrix features, 5 auto-regressive model features, 20 wavelets transform features and 5 absolute gradient statistics features. The datasets were randomly divided into two groups, the training set (~ 70%) and the test set (~ 30%). Combinations of data preprocessing methods, including normalization (Min-Max, Z-score, Mean), dimensionality reduction (Pearson Correlation Coefficients (PCC)), feature selector (max-Number, cluster) and ten-fold cross-validation were analyzed for their prediction performance. Kaplan-Meier curve, Cox proportional hazards regression model were used and concordance index (C-index), integrated Brier score (IBS) were selected. Model performance was assessed using the C-index.

Results: WHO grade, age, gender, histogram (Mean, Perc.90%, Perc.99%), Gray-level co-occurrence matrix (S(3, -3)DifVarnc, S(5, 5)Correlat, S(1, 0)SumEntrp, S(2, -2)InvDfMom), Teta1, WavEnLL_s-2 and GrVariance were identified as the significant recurrence factors. The pipeline using Mean_PCC_Cluster_10 of T1C yielded the highest efficiency with an IBS of 0.170, 0.188, 0.208 and C-index of 0.709, 0.705, 0.602 in the train, test and validation sets, respectively. The pipeline using MinMax_PCC_Cluster_19 of T2WI yielded the highest efficiency with an IBS of 0.189, 0.175, 0.185 and C-index of 0.783, 0.66, 0.649 in the train, test and validation sets. The pipeline using MinMax_PCC_Cluster_13 of T2WI + T1C yielded the highest efficiency with an IBS of 0.152, 0.164, 0.191 and C-index of 0.701, 0.656, 0.593 in the train, test and validation sets, respectively.

Conclusion: Knowledge discovery from MRI radiomic features can slightly help predict recurrence risk in HGMs. T2WI or T1C yielded better efficiency than T2WI + T1C. The parameters with the best power were Mean, Perc.99%, WavEnLL_s-2, Teta1 and GrVariance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自数据库的知识发现:MRI放射学特征评估高级别脑膜瘤复发风险。
目的:我们利用放射组学的t2加权成像(T2WI)和对比增强t1加权成像(T1C)的知识发现来评估高级别脑膜瘤(HGMs)患者的复发风险。方法:从每个ROI中提取279个特征,包括9个直方图特征、220个gy级共出现矩阵特征、20个gy级游程矩阵特征、5个自回归模型特征、20个小波变换特征和5个绝对梯度统计特征。数据集随机分为两组,训练集(~ 70%)和测试集(~ 30%)。分析了归一化(Min-Max, Z-score, Mean)、降维(Pearson Correlation Coefficients, PCC)、特征选择(max-Number, cluster)和十倍交叉验证等数据预处理方法的组合预测性能。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线、Cox比例风险回归模型,采用一致性指数(C-index)、综合Brier评分(IBS)。使用c指数评估模型性能。结果:WHO分级、年龄、性别、直方图(Mean、Perc.90%、Perc.99%)、灰度级共发生矩阵(S(3, -3)DifVarnc、S(5,5) correlation、S(1,0)SumEntrp、S(2, -2)InvDfMom)、Teta1、WavEnLL_s-2、GrVariance被确定为显著复发因素。使用T1C的Mean_PCC_Cluster_10的流水线效率最高,在训练集、测试集和验证集的IBS分别为0.170、0.188、0.208,C-index分别为0.709、0.705、0.602。使用T2WI的MinMax_PCC_Cluster_19的管道在训练集、测试集和验证集上的IBS分别为0.189、0.175、0.185,C-index分别为0.783、0.66、0.649,效率最高。使用T2WI + T1C的MinMax_PCC_Cluster_13的流水线效率最高,在训练集、测试集和验证集的IBS分别为0.152、0.164、0.191,C-index分别为0.701、0.656、0.593。结论:MRI放射学特征的知识发现对预测hgm的复发风险有一定的帮助。T2WI + T1C比T2WI + T1C有效率。最有效的参数为Mean、Perc.99%、WavEnLL_s-2、Teta1和GrVariance。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Reducing manual workload in CT and MRI annotation with the Segment Anything Model 2. A multiparameter diagnostic model based on MRI volumetric ADC histogram and clinical variables accurately differentiates thymic epithelial tumors from mediastinal lymphomas. Bidirectional cortical gyrification alterations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: links to cognitive impairment and global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease staging. T2 relaxation time of prostate measured at 5T: preliminary results in healthy adults. Cerebral small vessel disease moderates the association between executive dysfunction and spontaneous neural activity in adults who lost their only child.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1