Evolution of quality of life, anxiety, and depression over time in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm approaching the surgical threshold.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae150
Alexander Vanmaele, Petros Branidis, Maria Karamanidou, Elke Bouwens, Sanne E Hoeks, Jorg L de Bruin, Sander Ten Raa, K Martijn Akkerhuis, Felix van Lier, Ricardo P J Budde, Bram Fioole, Hence J M Verhagen, Eric Boersma, Isabella Kardys
{"title":"Evolution of quality of life, anxiety, and depression over time in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm approaching the surgical threshold.","authors":"Alexander Vanmaele, Petros Branidis, Maria Karamanidou, Elke Bouwens, Sanne E Hoeks, Jorg L de Bruin, Sander Ten Raa, K Martijn Akkerhuis, Felix van Lier, Ricardo P J Budde, Bram Fioole, Hence J M Verhagen, Eric Boersma, Isabella Kardys","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrary to the impact of screening, the effect of long-term surveillance on the quality of life of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm is not well known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe patient-reported outcomes of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm approaching the surgical threshold.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, observational cohort study included patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm with a maximum aneurysm diameter of greater than or equal to 40 mm. The EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (range -0.446 to 1, minimal clinically important difference 0.071), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire (0-21 points/subscale, minimal clinically important difference 1.7 points), and the short version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (0-6 points) were mailed to patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm at baseline and after 1 and 2 years or until abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery/death. Linear mixed-effects models were used to describe the evolution of patient-reported outcomes over time and investigate changes attributable to clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 291 to 294 responses to each questionnaire were available from 124 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm, of whom 34 underwent surgery during follow-up. The mean health-related quality of life and anxiety and depression scores over time were 0.781 (95% c.i. 0.749 to 0.814), 4.4 points (95% c.i. 3.9 to 4.9), and 4.6 points (95% c.i. 4.0 to 5.2) respectively. Anxiety and depression scores decreased in patients who underwent surgery with a mean of 2.8 (95% c.i. 1.1 to 4.6) and 2.0 (95% c.i. 0.4 to 3.6) points/year respectively, compared with patients who had not had surgery. Considering the minimal clinically important difference, patients with a primary education alone, compared with a secondary education, had higher or increasing anxiety and depression scores. Patients with a first-degree relative with an abdominal aortic aneurysm had a higher risk of clinical anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression remain stable over time on average, anxiety and depression decrease in patients approaching surgery. Patients with a family history of abdominal aortic aneurysm or a primary education alone experience more anxiety and/or depression and thus might benefit from a tailored approach during surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contrary to the impact of screening, the effect of long-term surveillance on the quality of life of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm is not well known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe patient-reported outcomes of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm approaching the surgical threshold.

Methods: This multicentre, observational cohort study included patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm with a maximum aneurysm diameter of greater than or equal to 40 mm. The EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (range -0.446 to 1, minimal clinically important difference 0.071), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire (0-21 points/subscale, minimal clinically important difference 1.7 points), and the short version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (0-6 points) were mailed to patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm at baseline and after 1 and 2 years or until abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery/death. Linear mixed-effects models were used to describe the evolution of patient-reported outcomes over time and investigate changes attributable to clinical characteristics.

Results: In total, 291 to 294 responses to each questionnaire were available from 124 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm, of whom 34 underwent surgery during follow-up. The mean health-related quality of life and anxiety and depression scores over time were 0.781 (95% c.i. 0.749 to 0.814), 4.4 points (95% c.i. 3.9 to 4.9), and 4.6 points (95% c.i. 4.0 to 5.2) respectively. Anxiety and depression scores decreased in patients who underwent surgery with a mean of 2.8 (95% c.i. 1.1 to 4.6) and 2.0 (95% c.i. 0.4 to 3.6) points/year respectively, compared with patients who had not had surgery. Considering the minimal clinically important difference, patients with a primary education alone, compared with a secondary education, had higher or increasing anxiety and depression scores. Patients with a first-degree relative with an abdominal aortic aneurysm had a higher risk of clinical anxiety.

Conclusion: Although health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression remain stable over time on average, anxiety and depression decrease in patients approaching surgery. Patients with a family history of abdominal aortic aneurysm or a primary education alone experience more anxiety and/or depression and thus might benefit from a tailored approach during surveillance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹主动脉瘤接近手术阈值患者的生活质量、焦虑和抑郁随时间的演变
背景:与筛查的影响相反,长期监测对腹主动脉瘤患者生活质量的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是描述腹主动脉瘤接近手术阈值的患者报告的结果。方法:这项多中心、观察性队列研究纳入了最大动脉瘤直径大于或等于40mm的腹主动脉瘤患者。EuroQol五维五级问卷(范围-0.446至1,最小临床重要差异0.071),医院焦虑和抑郁量表问卷(0-21分/次量表,最小临床重要差异1.7分),以及患者健康问卷的简短版本(0-6分)邮寄给基线和1年和2年后或直到腹主动脉瘤手术/死亡的患者。线性混合效应模型用于描述患者报告的结果随时间的演变,并调查可归因于临床特征的变化。结果:124例腹主动脉瘤患者共获得291 ~ 294份问卷,其中34例在随访期间接受了手术。随着时间的推移,与健康相关的生活质量、焦虑和抑郁的平均得分分别为0.781 (95% c.i. 0.749至0.814)、4.4分(95% c.i. 3.9至4.9)和4.6分(95% c.i. 4.0至5.2)。与未接受手术的患者相比,接受手术的患者的焦虑和抑郁评分分别下降了2.8分(95% c.i. 1.1至4.6)和2.0分(95% c.i. 0.4至3.6)/年。考虑到最小的临床重要差异,仅受过初等教育的患者与受过中等教育的患者相比,焦虑和抑郁得分更高或增加。一级亲属有腹主动脉瘤的患者有较高的临床焦虑风险。结论:尽管与健康相关的生活质量、焦虑和抑郁随着时间的推移平均保持稳定,但临近手术的患者焦虑和抑郁有所下降。有腹主动脉瘤家族史或仅受过小学教育的患者会经历更多的焦虑和/或抑郁,因此在监测期间可能受益于量身定制的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
期刊最新文献
Circulating large extracellular vesicles as diagnostic biomarkers of indeterminate thyroid nodules: multi-platform omics analysis. Evolution of quality of life, anxiety, and depression over time in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm approaching the surgical threshold. Organ-specific malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection: epidemiological meta-analysis of incidence rates. Risk factors and protective measures for desmoid tumours in familial adenomatous polyposis: retrospective cohort study. One-year results of an eHealth intervention on anxiety in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1