Leveraging Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Methods for Adverse Drug Event Detection in Electronic Health/Medical Records: A Scoping Review.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s40264-024-01505-6
Su Golder, Dongfang Xu, Karen O'Connor, Yunwen Wang, Mahak Batra, Graciela Gonzalez Hernandez
{"title":"Leveraging Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Methods for Adverse Drug Event Detection in Electronic Health/Medical Records: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Su Golder, Dongfang Xu, Karen O'Connor, Yunwen Wang, Mahak Batra, Graciela Gonzalez Hernandez","doi":"10.1007/s40264-024-01505-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) techniques may help harness unstructured free-text electronic health record (EHR) data to detect adverse drug events (ADEs) and thus improve pharmacovigilance. However, evidence of their real-world effectiveness remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarise the evidence on the effectiveness of NLP/ML in detecting ADEs from unstructured EHR data and ultimately improve pharmacovigilance in comparison to other data sources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted by searching six databases in July 2023. Studies leveraging NLP/ML to identify ADEs from EHR were included. Titles/abstracts were screened by two independent researchers as were full-text articles. Data extraction was conducted by one researcher and checked by another. A narrative synthesis summarises the research techniques, ADEs analysed, model performance and pharmacovigilance impacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies met the inclusion criteria covering a wide range of ADEs and medications. The utilisation of rule-based NLP, statistical models, and deep learning approaches was observed. Natural language processing/ML techniques with unstructured data improved the detection of under-reported adverse events and safety signals. However, substantial variability was noted in the techniques and evaluation methods employed across the different studies and limitations exist in integrating the findings into practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) have promising possibilities in extracting valuable insights with regard to pharmacovigilance from unstructured EHR data. These approaches have demonstrated proficiency in identifying specific adverse events and uncovering previously unknown safety signals that would not have been apparent through structured data alone. Nevertheless, challenges such as the absence of standardised methodologies and validation criteria obstruct the widespread adoption of NLP/ML for pharmacovigilance leveraging of unstructured EHR data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"321-337"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01505-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) techniques may help harness unstructured free-text electronic health record (EHR) data to detect adverse drug events (ADEs) and thus improve pharmacovigilance. However, evidence of their real-world effectiveness remains unclear.

Objective: To summarise the evidence on the effectiveness of NLP/ML in detecting ADEs from unstructured EHR data and ultimately improve pharmacovigilance in comparison to other data sources.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted by searching six databases in July 2023. Studies leveraging NLP/ML to identify ADEs from EHR were included. Titles/abstracts were screened by two independent researchers as were full-text articles. Data extraction was conducted by one researcher and checked by another. A narrative synthesis summarises the research techniques, ADEs analysed, model performance and pharmacovigilance impacts.

Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria covering a wide range of ADEs and medications. The utilisation of rule-based NLP, statistical models, and deep learning approaches was observed. Natural language processing/ML techniques with unstructured data improved the detection of under-reported adverse events and safety signals. However, substantial variability was noted in the techniques and evaluation methods employed across the different studies and limitations exist in integrating the findings into practice.

Conclusions: Natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) have promising possibilities in extracting valuable insights with regard to pharmacovigilance from unstructured EHR data. These approaches have demonstrated proficiency in identifying specific adverse events and uncovering previously unknown safety signals that would not have been apparent through structured data alone. Nevertheless, challenges such as the absence of standardised methodologies and validation criteria obstruct the widespread adoption of NLP/ML for pharmacovigilance leveraging of unstructured EHR data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用自然语言处理和机器学习方法在电子健康/医疗记录中检测药物不良事件:范围审查。
背景:自然语言处理(NLP)和机器学习(ML)技术可以帮助利用非结构化自由文本电子健康记录(EHR)数据来检测药物不良事件(ADEs),从而提高药物警惕性。然而,它们在现实世界中的有效性尚不清楚。目的:总结NLP/ML从非结构化电子病历数据中检测ade的有效性,并与其他数据来源进行比较,最终提高药物警惕性。方法:于2023年7月检索6个数据库进行范围综述。纳入了利用NLP/ML从电子病历中识别ade的研究。题目/摘要与全文文章一样由两名独立研究人员筛选。数据提取由一名研究员进行,并由另一名研究员进行检查。一篇叙述性综合综述了研究技术、ADEs分析、模型性能和药物警戒影响。结果:7项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖了广泛的不良事件和药物。观察到基于规则的NLP,统计模型和深度学习方法的使用。具有非结构化数据的自然语言处理/ML技术改进了对未报告的不良事件和安全信号的检测。然而,在不同的研究中使用的技术和评价方法存在很大的差异,并且在将研究结果纳入实践方面存在局限性。结论:自然语言处理(NLP)和机器学习(ML)在从非结构化电子病历数据中提取有关药物警戒的有价值的见解方面具有很大的可能性。这些方法已证明在识别特定不良事件和发现以前未知的安全信号方面的熟练程度,这些信号仅通过结构化数据是不明显的。然而,诸如缺乏标准化方法和验证标准等挑战阻碍了NLP/ML在利用非结构化电子病历数据进行药物警戒方面的广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
期刊最新文献
Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care: A Cross-Sectional Study. Trends in Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in Sweden by Sex and Age: A Drug Utilisation Study. Call to action: Pharmaceutical residues in the environment: threats to ecosystems and human health. Prenatal and Early Childhood Exposure to Proton Pump Inhibitors and Antibiotics and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Use of Reporting Recommendation Intended for Pharmaceutical Risk Minimisation Evaluation Studies (RIMES) Checklist in Risk Minimisation/Mitigation Studies: A Review and Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1