The driving-related attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of cannabis users in the Australian Capital Territory following decriminalisation.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drug and alcohol review Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1111/dar.13983
Danielle McCartney, Cilla Zhou, Isobel Lavender, Rebecca Gordon, Richard C Kevin, Miguel Bedoya-Pérez, Iain S McGregor
{"title":"The driving-related attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of cannabis users in the Australian Capital Territory following decriminalisation.","authors":"Danielle McCartney, Cilla Zhou, Isobel Lavender, Rebecca Gordon, Richard C Kevin, Miguel Bedoya-Pérez, Iain S McGregor","doi":"10.1111/dar.13983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In January 2020, the government of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) decriminalised the possession and cultivation of cannabis for personal use. This study explored the driving-related attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of ACT residents who are legally cultivating and consuming cannabis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-part cross-sectional study was conducted. Part-1: Cannabis users residing in the ACT were invited to complete an online survey. Part-2: Survey respondents who reported 'currently growing' cannabis were invited to submit a sample of their home-grown cannabis for phytocannabinoid analysis. Data from Parts 1 and 2 were used to estimate participants' usual Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) intakes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N = 385 cannabis users completed all or part of the online survey and N = 52 submitted cannabis samples for phytocannabinoid analysis. Most participants (N = 224/330; 67.9%) reported waiting ≥7 h following cannabis use before driving. However, 21.5% (N = 71/330) reported waiting ≤3 h. These individuals had the highest cannabis and THC intakes of the sample (where known). Further analyses revealed that individuals who expressed less concern about roadside drug testing and the effects of non-medicinal and medicinal cannabis on driving, and who used cannabis more frequently, in larger amounts, and exclusively for non-medicinal purposes were more likely to report shorter 'wait times'.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>A small proportion of cannabis users in the ACT appear to be driving shortly (i.e., ≤3 h) after consuming considerable quantities of cannabis and THC. This behaviour puts them at risk of driving while impaired and incurring legal sanctions. Interventions alerting these individuals to these possible risks are, therefore, warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In January 2020, the government of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) decriminalised the possession and cultivation of cannabis for personal use. This study explored the driving-related attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of ACT residents who are legally cultivating and consuming cannabis.

Methods: A two-part cross-sectional study was conducted. Part-1: Cannabis users residing in the ACT were invited to complete an online survey. Part-2: Survey respondents who reported 'currently growing' cannabis were invited to submit a sample of their home-grown cannabis for phytocannabinoid analysis. Data from Parts 1 and 2 were used to estimate participants' usual Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) intakes.

Results: N = 385 cannabis users completed all or part of the online survey and N = 52 submitted cannabis samples for phytocannabinoid analysis. Most participants (N = 224/330; 67.9%) reported waiting ≥7 h following cannabis use before driving. However, 21.5% (N = 71/330) reported waiting ≤3 h. These individuals had the highest cannabis and THC intakes of the sample (where known). Further analyses revealed that individuals who expressed less concern about roadside drug testing and the effects of non-medicinal and medicinal cannabis on driving, and who used cannabis more frequently, in larger amounts, and exclusively for non-medicinal purposes were more likely to report shorter 'wait times'.

Discussion and conclusion: A small proportion of cannabis users in the ACT appear to be driving shortly (i.e., ≤3 h) after consuming considerable quantities of cannabis and THC. This behaviour puts them at risk of driving while impaired and incurring legal sanctions. Interventions alerting these individuals to these possible risks are, therefore, warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除罪化后,澳大利亚首都地区大麻使用者与驾驶有关的态度、信念和行为。
导读:2020年1月,澳大利亚首都领地(ACT)政府将持有和种植供个人使用的大麻合法化。本研究探讨了合法种植和消费大麻的ACT居民的驾驶相关态度、信仰和行为。方法:采用两部分横断面研究。第一部分:邀请居住在澳大利亚首都领地的大麻使用者完成一项在线调查。第二部分:报告“目前种植”大麻的调查受访者被邀请提交一份他们自己种植的大麻样本,用于植物大麻素分析。第1部分和第2部分的数据用于估计参与者通常的Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)摄入量。结果:N = 385大麻使用者完成了全部或部分在线调查,N = 52提交了大麻样本进行植物大麻素分析。大多数参与者(N = 224/330;67.9%)报告在使用大麻后等待≥7小时才开车。然而,21.5% (N = 71/330)的患者报告等待时间≤3小时。这些人的大麻和四氢大麻酚摄入量在样本中最高(已知的地方)。进一步的分析表明,那些对路边药物测试以及非药用和药用大麻对驾驶的影响表示不太关注的人,以及那些使用大麻更频繁、数量更大、专门用于非药用目的的人,更有可能报告更短的“等待时间”。讨论和结论:澳大利亚首都领地一小部分大麻使用者在摄入大量大麻和四氢大麻酚后,似乎很快就会开车(即≤3小时)。这种行为使他们面临着受损驾驶和招致法律制裁的风险。因此,有必要采取干预措施,提醒这些人注意这些可能的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
期刊最新文献
Substance-involved child-to-parent violence. General dental practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and practice towards psychoactive substance use screening: A systematic review. The alcohol use disorder treatment gap and its correlates among middle-aged and older adults. Exploring experiences of talk therapies among gay and bisexual men seeking to reduce or abstain from using crystal methamphetamine in the context of chemsex. Systemic inequities in alcohol licensing: Case studies in eight Aotearoa New Zealand communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1