Acute hypoalgesic and neurophysiological responses to lower-limb ischaemic preconditioning.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06985-7
Ryan Norbury, Ian Grant, Alex Woodhead, Stephen D Patterson
{"title":"Acute hypoalgesic and neurophysiological responses to lower-limb ischaemic preconditioning.","authors":"Ryan Norbury, Ian Grant, Alex Woodhead, Stephen D Patterson","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06985-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess if ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) can reduce pain perception and enhance corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions. In a randomised, within-subject design, healthy participants took part in three experimental visits after a familiarisation session. Measures of pressure pain threshold (PPT), maximum voluntary isometric force, voluntary activation, resting twitch force, corticospinal excitability and corticospinal inhibition were performed before and ≥10 min after either, unilateral IPC on the right leg (3 × 5 min); a sham protocol (3 × 1 min); or a control (no occlusion). Pain perception was then assessed in response to a hypertonic saline injection into the vastus lateralis muscle. In the right (occluded) leg, PPT was 10% greater after IPC compared to sham (P = 0.004). PPTs were also 9.5% greater in the contralateral leg for IPC compared to sham (P = 0.031). Maximum voluntary force, voluntary activation and resting twitch force were not different between conditions (all P ≥ 0.133). Measures of corticospinal excitability and inhibition also revealed no significant differences between conditions (all P ≥ 0.240). Hypertonic saline evoked pain revealed no difference in reported intensity or duration between conditions (P ≥ 0.082). IPC can reduce pain sensitivity in local and remote areas but does not subsequently impact neurophysiological measures of excitability or inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06985-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess if ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) can reduce pain perception and enhance corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions. In a randomised, within-subject design, healthy participants took part in three experimental visits after a familiarisation session. Measures of pressure pain threshold (PPT), maximum voluntary isometric force, voluntary activation, resting twitch force, corticospinal excitability and corticospinal inhibition were performed before and ≥10 min after either, unilateral IPC on the right leg (3 × 5 min); a sham protocol (3 × 1 min); or a control (no occlusion). Pain perception was then assessed in response to a hypertonic saline injection into the vastus lateralis muscle. In the right (occluded) leg, PPT was 10% greater after IPC compared to sham (P = 0.004). PPTs were also 9.5% greater in the contralateral leg for IPC compared to sham (P = 0.031). Maximum voluntary force, voluntary activation and resting twitch force were not different between conditions (all P ≥ 0.133). Measures of corticospinal excitability and inhibition also revealed no significant differences between conditions (all P ≥ 0.240). Hypertonic saline evoked pain revealed no difference in reported intensity or duration between conditions (P ≥ 0.082). IPC can reduce pain sensitivity in local and remote areas but does not subsequently impact neurophysiological measures of excitability or inhibition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Synchronization of auditory-hand tapping coupling: the effect of aging. The roles of vision and proprioception in spatial tuning of sensory attenuation. Acute hypoalgesic and neurophysiological responses to lower-limb ischaemic preconditioning. The role of muscle synergies and task constraints on upper limb motor impairment after stroke. The link between eye movements and cognitive function in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1