Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: identifying hesitant groups and exploring reasons for vaccination hesitancy, from adolescence to late adulthood.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456265
Laure Pauly, Caroline Residori, Hamid Bulut, Dmitry Bulaev, Soumyabrata Ghosh, Marc P O'Sullivan, Joëlle V Fritz, Michel Vaillant, Basile Rommes, Robin Samuel, Venkata P Satagopam, Rejko Krüger, Anja K Leist
{"title":"Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: identifying hesitant groups and exploring reasons for vaccination hesitancy, from adolescence to late adulthood.","authors":"Laure Pauly, Caroline Residori, Hamid Bulut, Dmitry Bulaev, Soumyabrata Ghosh, Marc P O'Sullivan, Joëlle V Fritz, Michel Vaillant, Basile Rommes, Robin Samuel, Venkata P Satagopam, Rejko Krüger, Anja K Leist","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease-2019) pandemic highlighted the importance of assessing the rationales behind vaccine hesitancy for the containment of pandemics. In this nationwide study, representative of the Luxembourgish population, we identified hesitant groups from adolescence to late adulthood and explored motivations both for and against vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined data collected via online surveys for the CON-VINCE (COvid-19 National survey for assessing VIral spread by Non-affected CarriErs) study, 1865 respondents aged 18-84, and for the YAC (Young people And Covid-19) study, 3740 respondents aged 12-29. Data from both studies were harmonized and weighted to ensure a sample representative of Luxembourg's resident population. The surveys included information on demographic and socio-economic factors as well as vaccination hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the time of the survey, 67.0% of respondents had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome COronaVirus-2), while 33.0% of the respondents had not yet been vaccinated. Of those not yet vaccinated, 41.8% of respondents were vaccine hesitant. The most important concerns against vaccination were that the vaccine had not been tested sufficiently (59.4%) and the fear of side effects (52.4%). The most frequent reasons for vaccination were to help society overcome the pandemic (74.8%), and to protect oneself from the consequences of infection with the virus (69.3%). The proportion of unvaccinated respondents unwilling or undecided to get vaccinated was higher in the younger age groups compared to the higher age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings contribute to improving public health policy communications, not only for future pandemics but also for routine vaccination campaigns. This will help reach those who are unwilling (26.7%) or undecided (15.1%) about vaccination and reinforce strategies that have successfully increased vaccination willingness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1456265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease-2019) pandemic highlighted the importance of assessing the rationales behind vaccine hesitancy for the containment of pandemics. In this nationwide study, representative of the Luxembourgish population, we identified hesitant groups from adolescence to late adulthood and explored motivations both for and against vaccination.

Methods: We combined data collected via online surveys for the CON-VINCE (COvid-19 National survey for assessing VIral spread by Non-affected CarriErs) study, 1865 respondents aged 18-84, and for the YAC (Young people And Covid-19) study, 3740 respondents aged 12-29. Data from both studies were harmonized and weighted to ensure a sample representative of Luxembourg's resident population. The surveys included information on demographic and socio-economic factors as well as vaccination hesitancy.

Results: At the time of the survey, 67.0% of respondents had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome COronaVirus-2), while 33.0% of the respondents had not yet been vaccinated. Of those not yet vaccinated, 41.8% of respondents were vaccine hesitant. The most important concerns against vaccination were that the vaccine had not been tested sufficiently (59.4%) and the fear of side effects (52.4%). The most frequent reasons for vaccination were to help society overcome the pandemic (74.8%), and to protect oneself from the consequences of infection with the virus (69.3%). The proportion of unvaccinated respondents unwilling or undecided to get vaccinated was higher in the younger age groups compared to the higher age groups.

Conclusion: Our findings contribute to improving public health policy communications, not only for future pandemics but also for routine vaccination campaigns. This will help reach those who are unwilling (26.7%) or undecided (15.1%) about vaccination and reinforce strategies that have successfully increased vaccination willingness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从2019冠状病毒病大流行中吸取的教训:确定犹豫不决的群体,并探讨从青春期到成年后期犹豫不决的原因。
导言:COVID-19(冠状病毒病-2019)大流行凸显了评估疫苗犹豫背后的理由对遏制大流行的重要性。在这项代表卢森堡人口的全国性研究中,我们确定了从青春期到成年晚期的犹豫群体,并探讨了接种疫苗和反对接种疫苗的动机。方法:我们结合了CON-VINCE (COvid-19 National survey for assessment VIral spreading by Non-affected CarriErs)研究中1865名年龄在18-84岁的受访者和YAC (Young people and COvid-19)研究中3740名年龄在12-29岁的受访者的在线调查收集的数据。对两项研究的数据进行了协调和加权,以确保卢森堡常住人口的样本具有代表性。这些调查包括有关人口和社会经济因素以及疫苗接种犹豫的信息。结果:调查时,67.0%的应答者接种了SARS-CoV-2(严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2)疫苗,33.0%的应答者尚未接种疫苗。在尚未接种疫苗的人中,41.8%的受访者对疫苗犹豫不决。对疫苗接种最重要的担忧是疫苗没有得到充分的测试(59.4%)和担心副作用(52.4%)。接种疫苗最常见的原因是帮助社会战胜大流行(74.8%),以及保护自己免受病毒感染的后果(69.3%)。未接种疫苗的受访者不愿或未决定接种疫苗的比例在较年轻的年龄组中高于较高的年龄组。结论:我们的研究结果有助于改善公共卫生政策沟通,不仅针对未来的大流行,也针对常规疫苗接种运动。这将有助于接触那些不愿(26.7%)或未决定(15.1%)接种疫苗的人,并加强已成功提高接种意愿的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence driven transformation of pediatric eye health education based on bibliometric analysis and a cross-sectional survey. Prevalence and comorbidities of self-reported physician-diagnosed obesity among adults attending primary healthcare centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional survey. Association of air pollution and prior COVID-19 with atopic dermatitis risk: an interaction analysis in the UK biobank. Comprehensive geriatric assessment and management in primary care: a systematic literature review with a descriptive mapping of team composition and assessment instruments. Relative contributions of lifestyle factors to stage-specific progression and mortality in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: a prospective cohort study with multi-state models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1