Dayu Guan, Yijun Liu, Yue Gu, Bowen Zheng, Rong Sun, Yang Shen, Yucheng Yang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Specific Immunotherapy Combined with Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dayu Guan, Yijun Liu, Yue Gu, Bowen Zheng, Rong Sun, Yang Shen, Yucheng Yang","doi":"10.1159/000543023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Allergic diseases are common clinical diseases. Although allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) and biologics have been widely recognized, the clinical efficacy, safety, advantages and disadvantages of the combined application have not yet been sufficiently recognized. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of AIT combined with biologics in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify RCTs investigating AIT combined with biologics for treating allergic rhinitis and asthma. The relevant outcome indicators, including incidences of emergency drugs use, severe nasal symptoms, severe adverse effects (AEs), local reactions at the site of administration, headache, and general AEs, were collected and extracted. Routine and network meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan-5.4 and STATA-MP-14 to assess efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs and a retrospective study involving 1494 patients aged 5 to 65 years with allergic rhinitis and asthma were included in this review. ① Routine meta-analysis revealed that AIT combined with biologics was significantly better than control treatment (placebo, AIT or biologics) in terms of the incidence of emergency drugs use, severe nasal symptoms, and severe AEs (P=0.0002; P=0.01; P=0.02). However, the differences in the incidence of local reactions at the site of administration, headache and general AEs were not significant. ② In the network meta-analysis, compared with AIT or placebo alone, AIT combined with biologics observably reduced the incidence of emergency drugs use and severe nasal symptoms (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.73; OR=0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.63). Furthermore, AIT combined with biologics yielded an evidently lower incidence of serious adverse reactions than AIT alone (OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined application of AIT and biologics has promising prospects in the clinical treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma due to the improvement of both clinical efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION (PROSPERO #CRD42024496277).</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Allergic diseases are common clinical diseases. Although allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) and biologics have been widely recognized, the clinical efficacy, safety, advantages and disadvantages of the combined application have not yet been sufficiently recognized. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of AIT combined with biologics in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify RCTs investigating AIT combined with biologics for treating allergic rhinitis and asthma. The relevant outcome indicators, including incidences of emergency drugs use, severe nasal symptoms, severe adverse effects (AEs), local reactions at the site of administration, headache, and general AEs, were collected and extracted. Routine and network meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan-5.4 and STATA-MP-14 to assess efficacy and safety.
Results: Eight RCTs and a retrospective study involving 1494 patients aged 5 to 65 years with allergic rhinitis and asthma were included in this review. ① Routine meta-analysis revealed that AIT combined with biologics was significantly better than control treatment (placebo, AIT or biologics) in terms of the incidence of emergency drugs use, severe nasal symptoms, and severe AEs (P=0.0002; P=0.01; P=0.02). However, the differences in the incidence of local reactions at the site of administration, headache and general AEs were not significant. ② In the network meta-analysis, compared with AIT or placebo alone, AIT combined with biologics observably reduced the incidence of emergency drugs use and severe nasal symptoms (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.73; OR=0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.63). Furthermore, AIT combined with biologics yielded an evidently lower incidence of serious adverse reactions than AIT alone (OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.74).
Conclusion: The combined application of AIT and biologics has promising prospects in the clinical treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma due to the improvement of both clinical efficacy and safety.
期刊介绍:
''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.