A Digital Program for Daily Life Management With Endometriosis: Pilot Cohort Study on Symptoms and Quality of Life Among Participants.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.2196/58262
Zélia Breton, Emilie Stern, Mathilde Pinault, Delphine Lhuillery, Erick Petit, Pierre Panel, Maïa Alexaline
{"title":"A Digital Program for Daily Life Management With Endometriosis: Pilot Cohort Study on Symptoms and Quality of Life Among Participants.","authors":"Zélia Breton, Emilie Stern, Mathilde Pinault, Delphine Lhuillery, Erick Petit, Pierre Panel, Maïa Alexaline","doi":"10.2196/58262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After experiencing symptoms for an average of 7 years before diagnosis, patients with endometriosis are usually left with more questions than answers about managing their symptoms in the absence of a cure. To help women with endometriosis after their diagnosis, we developed a digital program combining user research, evidence-based medicine, and clinical expertise. Structured around cognitive behavioral therapy and the quality of life metrics from the Endometriosis Health Profile score, the program was designed to guide participants for 3 months.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cohort study was designed to measure the impact of a digital health program on the symptoms and quality of life levels of women with endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 63% (92/146) of the participants were included in the pilot study, recruited either free of charge through employer health insurance or via individual direct access. A control group of 404 women with endometriosis who did not follow the program, recruited through social media and mailing campaigns, was sampled (n=149, 36.9%) according to initial pain levels to ensure a similar pain profile to participants. Questionnaires assessing quality of life and symptom levels were emailed to both groups at baseline and 3 months. Descriptive statistics and statistical tests were used to analyze intragroup and intergroup differences, with Cohen d measuring effect sizes for significant results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 3 months, participants showed substantial improvements in global symptom burden, general pain level, anxiety, depression, dysmenorrhea, dysuria, chronic fatigue, neuropathic pain, and endo belly. These improvements were significantly different from the control group for global symptom burden (participants: mean -0.7, SD 1.6; controls: mean -0.3, SD 1.3; P=.048; small effect size), anxiety (participants: mean -1.1, SD 2.8; controls: mean 0.2, SD 2.5; P<.001; medium effect size), depression (participants: mean -0.9, SD 2.5; controls: mean 0.0, SD 3.1; P=.04; small effect size), neuropathic pain (participants: mean -1.0, SD 2.7; controls: mean -0.1, SD 2.6; P=.004; small effect size), and endo belly (participants: mean -0.9, SD 2.5; controls: mean -0.3, SD 2.4; P=.03; small effect size). Participants' quality of life improved between baseline and 3 months and significantly differed from that of the control group for the core part of the Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (participants: mean -5.9, SD 21.0; controls: mean 1.0, SD 14.8; P=.03; small effect size) and the EQ-5D (participants: mean 0.1, SD 0.1; controls: mean -0.0, SD 0.1; P=.001; medium effect size). Perceived knowledge of endometriosis was significantly greater at 3 months among participants compared to the control group (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study's results suggest that a digital health program providing medical and scientific information about endometriosis and multidisciplinary self-management tools may be useful to reduce global symptom burden, anxiety, depression, neuropathic pain, and endo belly while improving knowledge on endometriosis and quality of life among participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":" ","pages":"e58262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After experiencing symptoms for an average of 7 years before diagnosis, patients with endometriosis are usually left with more questions than answers about managing their symptoms in the absence of a cure. To help women with endometriosis after their diagnosis, we developed a digital program combining user research, evidence-based medicine, and clinical expertise. Structured around cognitive behavioral therapy and the quality of life metrics from the Endometriosis Health Profile score, the program was designed to guide participants for 3 months.

Objective: This cohort study was designed to measure the impact of a digital health program on the symptoms and quality of life levels of women with endometriosis.

Methods: In total, 63% (92/146) of the participants were included in the pilot study, recruited either free of charge through employer health insurance or via individual direct access. A control group of 404 women with endometriosis who did not follow the program, recruited through social media and mailing campaigns, was sampled (n=149, 36.9%) according to initial pain levels to ensure a similar pain profile to participants. Questionnaires assessing quality of life and symptom levels were emailed to both groups at baseline and 3 months. Descriptive statistics and statistical tests were used to analyze intragroup and intergroup differences, with Cohen d measuring effect sizes for significant results.

Results: Over 3 months, participants showed substantial improvements in global symptom burden, general pain level, anxiety, depression, dysmenorrhea, dysuria, chronic fatigue, neuropathic pain, and endo belly. These improvements were significantly different from the control group for global symptom burden (participants: mean -0.7, SD 1.6; controls: mean -0.3, SD 1.3; P=.048; small effect size), anxiety (participants: mean -1.1, SD 2.8; controls: mean 0.2, SD 2.5; P<.001; medium effect size), depression (participants: mean -0.9, SD 2.5; controls: mean 0.0, SD 3.1; P=.04; small effect size), neuropathic pain (participants: mean -1.0, SD 2.7; controls: mean -0.1, SD 2.6; P=.004; small effect size), and endo belly (participants: mean -0.9, SD 2.5; controls: mean -0.3, SD 2.4; P=.03; small effect size). Participants' quality of life improved between baseline and 3 months and significantly differed from that of the control group for the core part of the Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (participants: mean -5.9, SD 21.0; controls: mean 1.0, SD 14.8; P=.03; small effect size) and the EQ-5D (participants: mean 0.1, SD 0.1; controls: mean -0.0, SD 0.1; P=.001; medium effect size). Perceived knowledge of endometriosis was significantly greater at 3 months among participants compared to the control group (P<.001).

Conclusions: This study's results suggest that a digital health program providing medical and scientific information about endometriosis and multidisciplinary self-management tools may be useful to reduce global symptom burden, anxiety, depression, neuropathic pain, and endo belly while improving knowledge on endometriosis and quality of life among participants.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜异位症患者日常生活管理的数字程序:参与者症状和生活质量的初步研究。
背景:子宫内膜异位症患者在确诊前平均经历了7年的痛苦,在没有治愈方法的情况下,对于如何控制症状,他们通常留下更多的问题而不是答案。为了帮助诊断出子宫内膜异位症的女性,我们开发了一个在线支持项目,结合了用户研究、循证医学和临床专业知识。该项目以CBT和EHP评分中的生活质量指标为基础,旨在指导参与者进行为期3个月的治疗,目前已在法国推出。目的:本队列研究旨在测量数字健康计划对子宫内膜异位症女性症状和生活质量水平的影响。方法:92名参与者被纳入试点研究,共有146名项目参与者自愿参与并评估了本研究的资格。他们要么通过雇主健康保险免费招聘,要么通过个人直接招聘。通过社交媒体和邮寄活动招募了未遵循该计划的子宫内膜异位症女性作为对照组(n=404)。评估生活质量和症状水平的问卷在基线和三个月时通过电子邮件发送给项目参与者和对照组。根据初始疼痛水平对对照组进行采样,以获得对照组和项目参与者之间相似的疼痛概况(n=149)。使用描述性统计和统计检验(卡方检验、Fisher’s exact检验、Wilcoxon检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、学生t检验)分析组内和组间差异,对显著结果使用Cohen’s D测量效应大小。结果:三个月后,总体症状负担、疼痛、焦虑、抑郁、痛经、排尿困难、慢性疲劳、神经性疼痛和腹内水平在项目参与者中显著改善。总体症状负担的改善与对照组相比有显著差异(平均±SD:参与者=-0.7±1.6,对照组=-0.3±1.3,P=。结论:本初步研究的结果表明,提供有关子宫内膜异位症的医学和科学信息以及多学科自我管理工具的数字健康计划可能有助于减轻总体症状负担、焦虑、抑郁、神经性疼痛和内腹,同时提高参与者对子宫内膜异位症的认识和生活质量。临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge graphs based on meta-analysis papers improve the quality of case formulation: a mixed methods design. Exploring Feature Priorities and User Needs in Developing Virtual Study Assistants. Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After Sobriety in Combination With an Adjunctive Journaling App in Patients With Alcohol-Related Liver Disease: Prospective Single-Arm Study. Automated Annotation of Pain Chronicity in Patients With Back Pain by Using Electronic Health Records: Retrospective Study. Cross-Cultural Differences in Public Discourse on COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States and South Korea: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using Natural Language Processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1