Jason V Thomas, Brenda M Davy, Richard A Winett, Christopher M Depner, Micah J Drummond, Paul A Estabrooks, Sheetal Hardikar, Zhining Ou, Jincheng Shen, Tanya M Halliday
{"title":"Timing of resistance exercise and cardiometabolic outcomes in adults with prediabetes: a secondary analysis.","authors":"Jason V Thomas, Brenda M Davy, Richard A Winett, Christopher M Depner, Micah J Drummond, Paul A Estabrooks, Sheetal Hardikar, Zhining Ou, Jincheng Shen, Tanya M Halliday","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00507.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to explore whether the time of day (AM vs. PM) resistance exercise is performed influences glucose and insulin concentrations, body composition, and muscular strength in adults with prediabetes. A secondary data analysis was conducted using data from the \"Resist Diabetes\" study, a phase II exercise intervention. Participants (age: 59.9 ± 5.4 yr; BMI: 33 ± 3.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) with prediabetes and overweight or obesity were categorized into AM (<i>n</i> = 73) or PM (<i>n</i> = 80) exercisers based on when they completed all of their supervised exercise sessions during a 12-wk, 2×/wk resistance exercise intervention. Blood glucose and insulin derived from oral glucose tolerance tests, body composition, and muscular strength were assessed pre- and post resistance exercise training. Inverse propensity score weighting approach was used to estimate the efficacy of AM versus PM exercise on the change of clinical responses. Paired samples <i>t</i> test was used to compare pre-/post-outcomes within AM and PM groups. No differences between AM and PM exercisers were detected in the change in glucose or insulin area under the curve (AUC), body composition, or muscular strength. When exploring within-group changes, PM exercisers reduced glucose AUC (change: -800.6 mg/dL·120 min; <i>P</i> = 0.01), whereas no significant change was detected for AM exercisers (change: -426.9 mg/dL·120 min; <i>P</i> = 0.26). Only AM exercisers increased fat-free mass (change: 0.6 kg; <i>P</i> = 0.001). The time of day resistance exercise is performed may have some impact on glucose concentrations and body composition response. Future randomized clinical trials are needed to understand how exercise timing influences cardiometabolic outcomes in at-risk adults.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In this secondary analysis, there was no difference between AM and PM exercisers in blood glucose, insulin, body composition, or muscular strength following 12 wk of supervised exercise. However, examining within-group changes, glucose area under the curve (AUC) was significantly reduced in PM exercisers, but not in AM exercisers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"439-449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00507.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore whether the time of day (AM vs. PM) resistance exercise is performed influences glucose and insulin concentrations, body composition, and muscular strength in adults with prediabetes. A secondary data analysis was conducted using data from the "Resist Diabetes" study, a phase II exercise intervention. Participants (age: 59.9 ± 5.4 yr; BMI: 33 ± 3.7 kg/m2) with prediabetes and overweight or obesity were categorized into AM (n = 73) or PM (n = 80) exercisers based on when they completed all of their supervised exercise sessions during a 12-wk, 2×/wk resistance exercise intervention. Blood glucose and insulin derived from oral glucose tolerance tests, body composition, and muscular strength were assessed pre- and post resistance exercise training. Inverse propensity score weighting approach was used to estimate the efficacy of AM versus PM exercise on the change of clinical responses. Paired samples t test was used to compare pre-/post-outcomes within AM and PM groups. No differences between AM and PM exercisers were detected in the change in glucose or insulin area under the curve (AUC), body composition, or muscular strength. When exploring within-group changes, PM exercisers reduced glucose AUC (change: -800.6 mg/dL·120 min; P = 0.01), whereas no significant change was detected for AM exercisers (change: -426.9 mg/dL·120 min; P = 0.26). Only AM exercisers increased fat-free mass (change: 0.6 kg; P = 0.001). The time of day resistance exercise is performed may have some impact on glucose concentrations and body composition response. Future randomized clinical trials are needed to understand how exercise timing influences cardiometabolic outcomes in at-risk adults.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this secondary analysis, there was no difference between AM and PM exercisers in blood glucose, insulin, body composition, or muscular strength following 12 wk of supervised exercise. However, examining within-group changes, glucose area under the curve (AUC) was significantly reduced in PM exercisers, but not in AM exercisers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.