Evaluating interface pressure in a lower-limb prosthetic socket: Comparison of FEM and experimental measurements on a roll-over simulator.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112513
Maïalen Matray, Xavier Bonnet, Pierre-Yves Rohan, Laurine Calistri, Hélène Pillet
{"title":"Evaluating interface pressure in a lower-limb prosthetic socket: Comparison of FEM and experimental measurements on a roll-over simulator.","authors":"Maïalen Matray, Xavier Bonnet, Pierre-Yves Rohan, Laurine Calistri, Hélène Pillet","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improper socket fitting in lower-limb prostheses can lead to significant complications, including pain, skin lesions, and pressure ulcers. Current suspension and socket design practices rely predominantly on visual inspection of the residual limb and patient feedback. Monitoring stress distribution at the residual limb/socket interface offers a more objective approach. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) enables to estimate interface pressure distribution prior to manufacture to provide the orthoprosthetist with quantitative data during socket rectification and interface prosthetic components selection. However, although numerous FEA models are available, few have undergone rigorous validation against experimental pressure data. Indeed, limitations of commercial pressure sensors typically include cumbersomeness or imprecision, thereby hindering systematic measurements within the socket. In this study, we introduce a low-cost, accurate pressure sensing system integrated into 3D-printed sockets for FEA validation. The system is implemented on a roll-over simulator that uses a mock limb to mimic the interaction between a transtibial residual limb and socket during the unipodal stance phase. A FEA of the simulator was then conducted, and predicted interface pressures were compared to experimental measurements at seven discrete locations. The model demonstrated a high degree of sensitivity to the geometry of the mock limb; however, with an accurate shape description, it was able to predict pressure with an average absolute error of 12 kPa. This work advances the validation of residual limb FEA for estimating residual limb/socket interface pressures. It highlights the potential of FEA for designing data-driven sockets and ultimately improve the comfort of prosthesis users.</p>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"180 ","pages":"112513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improper socket fitting in lower-limb prostheses can lead to significant complications, including pain, skin lesions, and pressure ulcers. Current suspension and socket design practices rely predominantly on visual inspection of the residual limb and patient feedback. Monitoring stress distribution at the residual limb/socket interface offers a more objective approach. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) enables to estimate interface pressure distribution prior to manufacture to provide the orthoprosthetist with quantitative data during socket rectification and interface prosthetic components selection. However, although numerous FEA models are available, few have undergone rigorous validation against experimental pressure data. Indeed, limitations of commercial pressure sensors typically include cumbersomeness or imprecision, thereby hindering systematic measurements within the socket. In this study, we introduce a low-cost, accurate pressure sensing system integrated into 3D-printed sockets for FEA validation. The system is implemented on a roll-over simulator that uses a mock limb to mimic the interaction between a transtibial residual limb and socket during the unipodal stance phase. A FEA of the simulator was then conducted, and predicted interface pressures were compared to experimental measurements at seven discrete locations. The model demonstrated a high degree of sensitivity to the geometry of the mock limb; however, with an accurate shape description, it was able to predict pressure with an average absolute error of 12 kPa. This work advances the validation of residual limb FEA for estimating residual limb/socket interface pressures. It highlights the potential of FEA for designing data-driven sockets and ultimately improve the comfort of prosthesis users.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估下肢义肢窝内的界面压力:在翻转模拟器上的有限元和实验测量的比较。
下肢假体的套孔安装不当会导致严重的并发症,包括疼痛、皮肤损伤和压疮。目前的悬吊和关节窝设计主要依赖于残肢的目视检查和患者反馈。监测残肢/窝界面的应力分布提供了更客观的方法。有限元分析(FEA)能够在制造之前估计界面压力分布,为矫形义肢医师提供在套孔矫正和界面义肢组件选择期间的定量数据。然而,尽管有许多可用的有限元模型,但很少有模型经过严格的实验压力数据验证。事实上,商用压力传感器的局限性通常包括笨重或不精确,从而阻碍了插座内的系统测量。在本研究中,我们介绍了一种低成本,精确的压力传感系统集成到3d打印插座中,用于有限元分析验证。该系统是在一个翻转模拟器上实现的,该模拟器使用一个模拟肢体来模拟在单足站立阶段,跨胫残肢和关节窝之间的相互作用。然后对模拟器进行了有限元分析,并将预测的界面压力与七个离散位置的实验测量结果进行了比较。该模型对模拟肢体的几何形状具有高度的敏感性;然而,通过精确的形状描述,它能够预测压力,平均绝对误差为12 kPa。本工作进一步验证了残肢有限元法估算残肢/承插界面压力的有效性。它强调了有限元分析在设计数据驱动的插座和最终提高义肢使用者舒适度方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Adding secondary cognitive tasks to drop vertical jumps alters the landing mechanics of athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comparison of shank, rearfoot and forefoot coordination and its variability between runners with different strike patterns. Vastus lateralis muscle architecture, quality, and stiffness are determinants of maximal performance in athletes? 1D Network computational fluid dynamics for evaluating regional pressures in subjects with cement dust exposure. Evaluating interface pressure in a lower-limb prosthetic socket: Comparison of FEM and experimental measurements on a roll-over simulator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1