Osteoporosis and stroke: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s00774-025-01579-x
Miao He, Haochuan Yong, Zhidong Cao, Jie Li
{"title":"Osteoporosis and stroke: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Miao He, Haochuan Yong, Zhidong Cao, Jie Li","doi":"10.1007/s00774-025-01579-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Numerous observational studies have identified a link between osteoporosis and stroke. However, the causal genetic relationship between these conditions remains unclear. This study employs a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to ascertain the causal relationship between osteoporosis and stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the potential causal relationship between osteoporosis and stroke, including its subtypes. Genetic data for osteoporosis and stroke, along with their subtypes, were sourced from published genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) demonstrating genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10^ - 8) and independence (r^2 < 0.001) were selected for further analysis, provided they had an F-statistic ≥ 10. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was employed to evaluate causality, with results reported as odds ratios (ORs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test, while pleiotropy was tested using the MR-Egger intercept test. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to ensure the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Employing the IVW method, MR Egger method, and median-weighted method, we found no significant bidirectional causal relationship between osteoporosis and stroke or its subtypes, irrespective of the inclusion of potential pleiotropic SNPs. Sensitivity analyses affirmed the reliability and stability of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study findings indicate that there is no direct causal relationship between osteoporosis and stroke or its subtypes in either direction. Based on our results, although no direct link was found, secondary effects do exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":15116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-025-01579-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous observational studies have identified a link between osteoporosis and stroke. However, the causal genetic relationship between these conditions remains unclear. This study employs a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to ascertain the causal relationship between osteoporosis and stroke.

Materials and methods: We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the potential causal relationship between osteoporosis and stroke, including its subtypes. Genetic data for osteoporosis and stroke, along with their subtypes, were sourced from published genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) demonstrating genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10^ - 8) and independence (r^2 < 0.001) were selected for further analysis, provided they had an F-statistic ≥ 10. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was employed to evaluate causality, with results reported as odds ratios (ORs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test, while pleiotropy was tested using the MR-Egger intercept test. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to ensure the robustness of the results.

Results: Employing the IVW method, MR Egger method, and median-weighted method, we found no significant bidirectional causal relationship between osteoporosis and stroke or its subtypes, irrespective of the inclusion of potential pleiotropic SNPs. Sensitivity analyses affirmed the reliability and stability of these findings.

Conclusion: Our study findings indicate that there is no direct causal relationship between osteoporosis and stroke or its subtypes in either direction. Based on our results, although no direct link was found, secondary effects do exist.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (JBMM) provides an international forum for researchers and clinicians to present and discuss topics relevant to bone, teeth, and mineral metabolism, as well as joint and musculoskeletal disorders. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country. Membership in the society is not a prerequisite for submission. Acceptance is based on the originality, significance, and validity of the material presented. The journal is aimed at researchers and clinicians dedicated to improvements in research, development, and patient-care in the fields of bone and mineral metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Challenges to implementing artificial intelligence-enabled Chest X-ray in opportunistic screening for osteoporosis. Osteoporosis and stroke: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study. Sirt1 overexpression inhibits chondrocyte ferroptosis via Ftl deacetylation to suppress the development of osteoarthritis. Thoracolumbar kyphosis prognoses poor results after proximal femoral fracture: a 3-year multicenter prospective cohort study. Correction: Tea consumption and risk of bone health: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1