Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in the Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/jca.104380
Xiaojing Zhang, Jingze Zhang, Junyi He, Xiao Zhong, Jinming Yu, Linlin Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in the Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.","authors":"Xiaojing Zhang, Jingze Zhang, Junyi He, Xiao Zhong, Jinming Yu, Linlin Wang","doi":"10.7150/jca.104380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) shows promise in various cancers, but data in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ICI rechallenge in ESCC. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This multicenter study analyzed ESCC patients rechallenged with ICI from January 2020 to March 2023 across two medical institutions. Patients were divided into rechallenge (R) and non-rechallenge (NR) groups. Key outcomes studied were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. <b>Results:</b> Among 329 included ESCC patients, 211 were in the R group and 118 in the NR group, with a median follow-up of 17.1 months. The R group exhibited significantly prolonged median PFS (4.7 vs. 3.2 months; p <.001) and OS (9.3 vs. 6.2 months; p <.001) compared to the NR group. Notably, for patients who initially received radiotherapy, the R group showed significantly longer mPFS (5.1 vs. 3.2 months; p <.001) and mOS (10.4 vs. 5.9 months; p <.001). Incidences of all-grade (64.5% vs. 66.1%; p = .764) and grade ≥3 adverse events (17.5% vs. 18.6%; p = .802) did not significantly differ between groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> ICI rechallenge demonstrates efficacy and manageable safety in ESCC, particularly post-radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":"16 3","pages":"943-951"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.104380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) shows promise in various cancers, but data in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ICI rechallenge in ESCC. Materials and Methods: This multicenter study analyzed ESCC patients rechallenged with ICI from January 2020 to March 2023 across two medical institutions. Patients were divided into rechallenge (R) and non-rechallenge (NR) groups. Key outcomes studied were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Among 329 included ESCC patients, 211 were in the R group and 118 in the NR group, with a median follow-up of 17.1 months. The R group exhibited significantly prolonged median PFS (4.7 vs. 3.2 months; p <.001) and OS (9.3 vs. 6.2 months; p <.001) compared to the NR group. Notably, for patients who initially received radiotherapy, the R group showed significantly longer mPFS (5.1 vs. 3.2 months; p <.001) and mOS (10.4 vs. 5.9 months; p <.001). Incidences of all-grade (64.5% vs. 66.1%; p = .764) and grade ≥3 adverse events (17.5% vs. 18.6%; p = .802) did not significantly differ between groups. Conclusion: ICI rechallenge demonstrates efficacy and manageable safety in ESCC, particularly post-radiotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫检查点抑制剂再挑战治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效和安全性。
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的再挑战在各种癌症中显示出希望,但在食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)中的数据有限。本研究旨在评价ESCC中ICI再灌注的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:本多中心研究分析了两家医疗机构2020年1月至2023年3月期间再患ICI的ESCC患者。将患者分为再挑战组(R)和非再挑战组(NR)。研究的主要结果是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。结果:纳入的329例ESCC患者中,R组211例,NR组118例,中位随访时间17.1个月。R组的中位PFS明显延长(4.7个月vs. 3.2个月;结论:ICI再挑战在ESCC中显示出有效性和可管理的安全性,特别是在放疗后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer
Journal of Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
333
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
ADAM10 is a key player in the diagnosis, prognosis and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Addition of Bevacizumab to Vinorelbine-Platinum combination is efficacious in Heavily Pretreated HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. KLK7 Involvement in Thyroid Papillary Carcinoma Cell Migration and Invasion by EMT via MAPK/ERK Pathways. NUPR1 contributes to endocrine therapy resistance by modulating BIRC5 expression and inducing luminal B-ERBB2+ subtype-like characteristics in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. The Impact of MET Variants in Oral Cancer Progression and Clinicopathological Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1