Symptom Attributions in Illness Anxiety Disorder.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1002/jclp.23765
Monique L Holden, Chien H Gooi, Sophie Antognelli, Amy Joubert, Isaac Sabel, Lauren Stavropoulos, Jill M Newby
{"title":"Symptom Attributions in Illness Anxiety Disorder.","authors":"Monique L Holden, Chien H Gooi, Sophie Antognelli, Amy Joubert, Isaac Sabel, Lauren Stavropoulos, Jill M Newby","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A major characteristic of health anxiety is the tendency to attribute benign bodily sensations to serious illnesses. This has been supported by empirical research in non-clinical samples, and samples of individuals diagnosed with Hypochondriasis. However, no study to date has explored symptom attribution styles of individuals with the DSM-5 diagnosis of Illness Anxiety Disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-one participants, including a clinical Illness Anxiety Disorder (n = 35) and healthy control (n = 26) sample, completed self-report measures of health anxiety and an Attribution Task, whereby they were presented with eight common bodily sensations and asked to generate possible explanations for them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that relative to healthy controls, participants with Illness Anxiety Disorder overall were more likely to make more serious, 'catastrophic' somatic attributions to symptoms, and less likely to generate non-threatening normalising explanations. These results also extended to their initial attributions, conceptualised as the 'jumping to conclusions' bias, and as an exploratory index of flexibility, they were also found to make less attributions overall compared to healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide support for the cognitive behavioural theory of health anxiety, and highlight the importance of assessing and addressing symptom attributions with clients with illness anxiety disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A major characteristic of health anxiety is the tendency to attribute benign bodily sensations to serious illnesses. This has been supported by empirical research in non-clinical samples, and samples of individuals diagnosed with Hypochondriasis. However, no study to date has explored symptom attribution styles of individuals with the DSM-5 diagnosis of Illness Anxiety Disorder.

Methods: Sixty-one participants, including a clinical Illness Anxiety Disorder (n = 35) and healthy control (n = 26) sample, completed self-report measures of health anxiety and an Attribution Task, whereby they were presented with eight common bodily sensations and asked to generate possible explanations for them.

Results: Results showed that relative to healthy controls, participants with Illness Anxiety Disorder overall were more likely to make more serious, 'catastrophic' somatic attributions to symptoms, and less likely to generate non-threatening normalising explanations. These results also extended to their initial attributions, conceptualised as the 'jumping to conclusions' bias, and as an exploratory index of flexibility, they were also found to make less attributions overall compared to healthy controls.

Conclusions: Findings provide support for the cognitive behavioural theory of health anxiety, and highlight the importance of assessing and addressing symptom attributions with clients with illness anxiety disorder.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疾病焦虑障碍的症状归因
目的:健康焦虑的一个主要特征是倾向于将良性的身体感觉归因于严重的疾病。在非临床样本和诊断为疑病症的个体样本中进行的实证研究支持了这一点。然而,迄今为止还没有研究探讨了DSM-5诊断为疾病焦虑障碍的个体的症状归因风格。方法:61名参与者,包括临床疾病焦虑障碍(n = 35)和健康对照(n = 26)样本,完成了健康焦虑的自我报告测量和归因任务,其中他们被告知8种常见的身体感觉,并被要求为它们产生可能的解释。结果:结果显示,与健康对照组相比,患有疾病焦虑症的参与者总体上更有可能对症状做出更严重的“灾难性”躯体归因,而不太可能产生非威胁性的正常化解释。这些结果也延伸到他们最初的归因,被概念化为“急于下结论”的偏见,作为一种探索性的灵活性指数,与健康对照组相比,他们也发现了更少的归因。结论:研究结果为健康焦虑的认知行为理论提供了支持,并强调了评估和处理疾病焦虑障碍患者症状归因的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
期刊最新文献
How Metacognitions Contribute to Compulsive Online Shopping: An Exploratory Study. Virtual Reality Exposure for Treating PTSD Due to Military Sexual Trauma. Momentary Fluctuations in Impulsivity Predicts Suicidal Ideation Among Those With Problematic Alcohol Use. Applying Dialectical Behavior Therapy as a Transdiagnostic Treatment in a Case of Borderline Personality Disorder and Eating Disorder. Depression, Drinking to Cope, and Alcohol Use Severity Among Latinos Who Drink: The Moderating Role of Sex.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1