Alcohol use profile, motivation to quit, and attitude toward drinking in participants of a community alcohol de-addiction camp and a clinical setting: A comparative study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1080/15332640.2024.2445857
Pradeep Kumar Pc, Kishor M
{"title":"Alcohol use profile, motivation to quit, and attitude toward drinking in participants of a community alcohol de-addiction camp and a clinical setting: A comparative study.","authors":"Pradeep Kumar Pc, Kishor M","doi":"10.1080/15332640.2024.2445857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to a lack of awareness and inadequate health infrastructure, the treatment gap for any mental illness is increasing in lower- and middle-income countries, including India. As an alternative to institutional treatment, community de-addiction camps play an important role.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This comparative study examined alcohol use profiles, motivation to quit, and attitudes toward drinking in 84 participants, equally divided between a community alcohol de-addiction camp (<i>n</i> = 42) and a clinical setting (<i>n</i> = 42). Data were collected using a socio-demographic data sheet; alcohol use profile questionnaire; AUDIT, DASS21, and SOCRATES scales, and attitude toward drinking scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that community-based alcohol de-addiction camp participants were significantly older than the clinical population (<i>p</i> = 0.009). The mean age of alcohol onset was significantly lower in the camp group (<i>p</i> = 0.005), but the onset of regular use and duration of use were similar. Most participants in both groups drank daily. More clinical participants had previously attempted to quit (<i>p</i> = 0.025). There were no significant differences in stress, anxiety, or depression between groups. Camp participants showed higher motivation to quit (recognition: <i>p</i> = 0.15, ambivalence: <i>p</i> = 0.002, taking steps: <i>p</i> = 0.001), while clinical participants had a higher attitude toward drinking (social ease: <i>p</i> = 0.003, pleasure: <i>p</i> = 0.17, economic aspects: <i>p</i> = 0.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical implications: </strong>Both groups showed high daily alcohol use and readiness to quit, but alcohol de-addiction camp participants (ADCP) participants had higher eagerness for treatment and lower attitudes toward drinking. The study highlights the benefits of tailored, community-based interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2024.2445857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to a lack of awareness and inadequate health infrastructure, the treatment gap for any mental illness is increasing in lower- and middle-income countries, including India. As an alternative to institutional treatment, community de-addiction camps play an important role.

Method: This comparative study examined alcohol use profiles, motivation to quit, and attitudes toward drinking in 84 participants, equally divided between a community alcohol de-addiction camp (n = 42) and a clinical setting (n = 42). Data were collected using a socio-demographic data sheet; alcohol use profile questionnaire; AUDIT, DASS21, and SOCRATES scales, and attitude toward drinking scale.

Results: The study found that community-based alcohol de-addiction camp participants were significantly older than the clinical population (p = 0.009). The mean age of alcohol onset was significantly lower in the camp group (p = 0.005), but the onset of regular use and duration of use were similar. Most participants in both groups drank daily. More clinical participants had previously attempted to quit (p = 0.025). There were no significant differences in stress, anxiety, or depression between groups. Camp participants showed higher motivation to quit (recognition: p = 0.15, ambivalence: p = 0.002, taking steps: p = 0.001), while clinical participants had a higher attitude toward drinking (social ease: p = 0.003, pleasure: p = 0.17, economic aspects: p = 0.2).

Conclusion and clinical implications: Both groups showed high daily alcohol use and readiness to quit, but alcohol de-addiction camp participants (ADCP) participants had higher eagerness for treatment and lower attitudes toward drinking. The study highlights the benefits of tailored, community-based interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区戒酒营和临床环境参与者的酒精使用概况、戒酒动机和饮酒态度:一项比较研究
背景:由于缺乏认识和卫生基础设施不足,在包括印度在内的中低收入国家,任何精神疾病的治疗差距都在扩大。作为机构治疗的替代方案,社区戒毒营发挥着重要作用。方法:这项比较研究调查了84名参与者的酒精使用情况、戒烟动机和对饮酒的态度,这些参与者平均分为社区酒精戒断营(n = 42)和临床环境(n = 42)。使用社会人口统计数据表收集数据;酒精使用概况问卷;审计、DASS21和苏格拉底量表与饮酒态度量表。结果:研究发现,社区酒精戒断营参与者明显大于临床人群(p = 0.009)。camp组的平均酒精发作年龄显著降低(p = 0.005),但正常使用的开始时间和使用时间相似。两组的大多数参与者每天都喝酒。更多的临床参与者之前曾试图戒烟(p = 0.025)。两组之间在压力、焦虑或抑郁方面没有显著差异。营地参与者表现出更高的戒烟动机(认知:p = 0.15,矛盾心理:p = 0.002,采取措施:p = 0.001),而临床参与者对饮酒的态度更高(社交轻松:p = 0.003,快乐:p = 0.17,经济方面:p = 0.2)。结论和临床意义:两组均表现出较高的每日酒精使用量和戒断意愿,但酒精戒断营(ADCP)参与者对治疗的渴望更高,对饮酒的态度更低。这项研究强调了有针对性的、基于社区的干预措施的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse presents rigorous new studies and research on ethnicity and cultural variation in alcohol, tobacco, licit and illicit forms of substance use and abuse. The research is drawn from many disciplines and interdisciplinary areas in the social and behavioral sciences, public health, and helping professions. The Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse is an international forum for identification of emergent and culturally diverse substance use and abuse trends, and the implementation of culturally competent strategies in harm reduction, individual, group, and family treatment of substance abuse. The Journal systematically investigates the beliefs, attitudes, and values of substance abusers, searching for the answers to the origins of drug use and abuse for different ethnic groups. The Journal publishes research papers, review papers, policy commentaries, and conference proceedings. The Journal welcomes submissions from across the globe, and strives to ensure efficient review and publication outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Self-stigma and treatment motivation in inpatient with substance use disorders: Westside of Turkey. Outcomes of bio-psycho-social-spiritual community-based drug rehabilitation program for voluntary vs. court-mandated clients in the Philippines. Investigating the determinants of perceived shame in young adults with paternal substance use disorder in Pakistan: A phenomenological study. The relationship of cultural variables to attitudes toward prescription drug usage among Iranian/Persian Americans. Reducing maternal smoking using Indigenous knowledge, practices, and online technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1